Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview A8 Max

Name: Blackview A8 Max
Brand: Blackview

Le falta contraste. Aunque bien equipado, el smartphone básico A8 Max de Blackview sólo cuesta 90 Euros - y eso incluye hasta los gastos de envío. El smartphone de bajo coste de los fabricantes chinos puntúa con buena relación precio-valor, pero el mediocre contraste de su panel IPS HD es una rémora.

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (traducido por Francisco García), Published 10/28/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blackview A8 Max (A Serie)

Procesador

Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Adaptador gráfico

ARM Mali-T720

Memoría

2048 MB

pantalla

5.50 pulgadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels 267 PPI, capacitiva, LCD, IPS, lustroso: si

Disco duro

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11.13 GB libre

Conexiones

1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: 3,5 Millimeter Klinkenanschluss, Card Reader: microSD (hasta 64 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Beschleunigungsensor, Annäherungsensor, App2SD

Equipamento de red

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz; 3G: WCDMA 900 / 2100 MHz; 4G: LTE 800 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.9 x 154.3 x 78

Battería

3000 mAh Litio-Polimero, removeable, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 336 h, Tiempo de Conversación 3G (según el fabricante): 14 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Características adicionales

Altavoces: Monolautsprecher, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador de corriente modular, cable USB, Blackview UI, 12 Meses Garantía, SAR n.b., fanless

Peso

177 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 28 g

Precio

90 Euros

Enlaces

Blackview Pagina de inicio

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Blackview A8 Max Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Blackview A8 Max Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	34.3 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	316 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s
Oukitel U7 Plus Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.3 MBit/s
Leagoo M5 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	265 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79.4 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73.1 MBit/s
Oukitel U7 Plus Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.1 MBit/s
Leagoo M5 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.5 MBit/s

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click para cargar imágenes

click para cargar imágenes

click para cargar imágenes


376 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	396 cd/m²
394 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	389 cd/m²
399 cd/m²	436 cd/m²	402 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 436 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 406.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.2 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 403:1 (Negro: 1.08 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.18

	Blackview A8 Max IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Oukitel U7 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Leagoo M5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5"	TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Xiaomi Mi 5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-2%	10%	-18%	7%	20%	-11%	57%
Brightness middle	435	312 -28%	462 6%	401 -8%	344 -21%	508 17%	552 27%	598 37%
Brightness	407	315 -23%	437 7%	387 -5%	349 -14%	491 21%	526 29%	566 39%
Brightness Distribution	86	87 1%	91 6%	92 7%	89 3%	89 3%	91 6%	90 5%
Black Level *	1.08	0.56 48%	0.58 46%	0.53 51%	0.65 40%	0.58 46%	0.64 41%	0.51 53%
Contrast	403	557 38%	797 98%	757 88%	529 31%	876 117%	863 114%	1173 191%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.7	6.8 -19%	7.5 -32%	9.7 -70%	5.8 -2%	7 -23%	11 -93%	3.5 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.3	14 -14%	12.8 -4%	22.3 -81%	10.7 13%	14.1 -15%	20.8 -69%	6.1 50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.9	7.1 -20%	8.5 -44%	13.3 -125%	5.7 3%	6.1 -3%	14.3 -142%	3.5 41%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.77 ^79%	2.54 ^87%	2.3 ^96%	2.1 ^105%	2.15 ^102%	2.21 ^100%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	8164 ^80%	7402 ^88%	8914 ^73%	10359 ^63%	7792 ^83%	8068 ^81%	12996 ^50%	6532 ^100%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 11 ms subida
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 14 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
49 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 13 ms subida
49 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 36 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 83 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	18.5 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	27.6 MB/s +49%
Oukitel U7 Plus	22.6 MB/s +22%
Leagoo M5	18.48 MB/s 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	15.58 MB/s -16%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.89 MB/s +2%
Blackview R7	11.87 MB/s -36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	35.94 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	49.6 MB/s +38%
Oukitel U7 Plus	46.63 MB/s +30%
Leagoo M5	36.07 MB/s 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	31.85 MB/s -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5	39.11 MB/s +9%
Blackview R7	15.56 MB/s -57%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	5.65 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	7.87 MB/s +39%
Oukitel U7 Plus	2.18 MB/s -61%
Leagoo M5	5.46 MB/s -3%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.35 MB/s -23%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.85 MB/s +21%
Blackview R7	11.4 MB/s +102%
Xiaomi Mi 5	13.61 MB/s +141%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	16.15 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	22.18 MB/s +37%
Oukitel U7 Plus	11.25 MB/s -30%
Leagoo M5	14.98 MB/s -7%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	14.31 MB/s -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5	17.16 MB/s +6%
Blackview R7	28.02 MB/s +73%
Xiaomi Mi 5	106.8 MB/s +561%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	47.25 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	39.91 MB/s -16%
Oukitel U7 Plus	59 MB/s +25%
Leagoo M5	12.11 MB/s -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	7.56 MB/s -84%
TP-Link Neffos C5	52.4 MB/s +11%
Blackview R7	122.7 MB/s +160%
Xiaomi Mi 5	159.3 MB/s +237%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	141.8 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	228.8 MB/s +61%
Oukitel U7 Plus	125.9 MB/s -11%
Leagoo M5	133.7 MB/s -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	125.4 MB/s -12%
TP-Link Neffos C5	145.8 MB/s +3%
Blackview R7	247.6 MB/s +75%
Xiaomi Mi 5	459.6 MB/s +224%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	30916 Points
Ulefone Metal	37103 Points +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus	28683 Points -7%
Leagoo M5	24238 Points -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	23657 Points -23%
TP-Link Neffos C5	32681 Points +6%
Blackview R7	50572 Points +64%
Xiaomi Mi 5	116330 Points +276%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	3809 Points
Ulefone Metal	7059 Points +85%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3656 Points -4%
Leagoo M5	2921 Points -23%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3103 Points -19%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4906 Points +29%
Blackview R7	10762 Points +183%
Xiaomi Mi 5	29246 Points +668%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	3284 Points
Ulefone Metal	6469 Points +97%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3137 Points -4%
Leagoo M5	2478 Points -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2681 Points -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4223 Points +29%
Blackview R7	10334 Points +215%
Xiaomi Mi 5	32613 Points +893%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	8646 Points
Ulefone Metal	10371 Points +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus	8660 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	7886 Points -9%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	6902 Points -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5	9291 Points +7%
Blackview R7	12585 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi 5	21483 Points +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	158 Points
Ulefone Metal	293 Points +85%
Oukitel U7 Plus	155 Points -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5	203 Points +28%
Blackview R7	590 Points +273%
Xiaomi Mi 5	3542 Points +2142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	129 Points
Ulefone Metal	243 Points +88%
Oukitel U7 Plus	126 Points -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5	167 Points +29%
Blackview R7	518 Points +302%
Xiaomi Mi 5	4558 Points +3433%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	727 Points
Ulefone Metal	1057 Points +45%
Oukitel U7 Plus	749 Points +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5	810 Points +11%
Blackview R7	1155 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1976 Points +172%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	10 fps
Ulefone Metal	12 fps +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus	9.8 fps -2%
Leagoo M5	8 fps -20%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.9 fps -51%
TP-Link Neffos C5	8.3 fps -17%
Blackview R7	17 fps +70%
Xiaomi Mi 5	60 fps +500%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	6 fps
Ulefone Metal	19 fps +217%
Oukitel U7 Plus	5.9 fps -2%
Leagoo M5	4.4 fps -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	8.7 fps +45%
TP-Link Neffos C5	14 fps +133%
Blackview R7	17 fps +183%
Xiaomi Mi 5	90 fps +1400%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	4.5 fps
Ulefone Metal	6.4 fps +42%
Oukitel U7 Plus	2.1 fps -53%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -73%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2.8 fps -38%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi 5	42 fps +833%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	2.2 fps
Ulefone Metal	2.9 fps +32%
Oukitel U7 Plus	4.4 fps +100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3.6 fps +64%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.1 fps +177%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi 5	42 fps +1809%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	3.2 fps
Ulefone Metal	4.5 fps +41%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3.2 fps 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -62%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mi 5	31 fps +869%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	1.4 fps
Ulefone Metal	8.9 fps +536%
Oukitel U7 Plus	1.4 fps 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2.7 fps +93%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps +79%
Xiaomi Mi 5	30 fps +2043%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	3427 Points
Ulefone Metal	4079 Points +19%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3105 Points -9%
Leagoo M5	2808 Points -18%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2807 Points -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5	3443 Points 0%
Blackview R7	4364 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 5	6873 Points +101%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	1525 Points
Ulefone Metal	2458 Points +61%
Oukitel U7 Plus	1508 Points -1%
Leagoo M5	1166 Points -24%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1206 Points -21%
Blackview R7	2851 Points +87%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	589 Points
Ulefone Metal	609 Points +3%
Oukitel U7 Plus	580 Points -2%
Leagoo M5	407 Points -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	428 Points -27%
Blackview R7	728 Points +24%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	201 Points
Ulefone Metal	273 Points +36%
Oukitel U7 Plus	568 Points +183%
Leagoo M5	144 Points -28%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	148 Points -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5	683 Points +240%
Blackview R7	338 Points +68%
Xiaomi Mi 5	2392 Points +1090%
System (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	1125 Points
Ulefone Metal	1691 Points +50%
Oukitel U7 Plus	1120 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	990 Points -12%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	838 Points -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5	1199 Points +7%
Blackview R7	1971 Points +75%
Xiaomi Mi 5	3638 Points +223%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	733 Points
Ulefone Metal	802 Points +9%
Oukitel U7 Plus	770 Points +5%
Leagoo M5	331 Points -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	354 Points -52%
TP-Link Neffos C5	991 Points +35%
Blackview R7	1030 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1801 Points +146%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	211 Points
Ulefone Metal	433 Points +105%
Oukitel U7 Plus	211 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	139 Points -34%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	175 Points -17%
TP-Link Neffos C5	281 Points +33%
Blackview R7	655 Points +210%
Xiaomi Mi 5	4522 Points +2043%
Web (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	9 Points
Ulefone Metal	10 Points +11%
Oukitel U7 Plus	573 Points +6267%
Leagoo M5	9 Points 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	9 Points 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5	638 Points +6989%
Blackview R7	10 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1106 Points +12189%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	13643 ms *
Ulefone Metal	13397 ms * +2%
Oukitel U7 Plus	14931 ms * -9%
Leagoo M5	14767 ms * -8%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	19092 ms * -40%
TP-Link Neffos C5	12783 ms * +6%
Blackview R7	9748 ms * +29%
Xiaomi Mi 5	2973 ms * +78%

Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	2607 Points
Ulefone Metal	2738 Points +5%
Oukitel U7 Plus	2554 Points -2%
Leagoo M5	2144 Points -18%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2122 Points -19%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2738 Points +5%
Blackview R7	3885 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mi 5	8619 Points +231%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
Blackview A8 Max	17.19 Points
Ulefone Metal	17.83 Points +4%
Oukitel U7 Plus	17.26 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	14.45 Points -16%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	12.76 Points -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.21 Points +6%
Blackview R7	25.35 Points +47%
Xiaomi Mi 5	54 Points +214%

Leyenda

Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


38 °C	37.6 °C	40.6 °C
39.3 °C	38.4 °C	40.4 °C
38.2 °C	38.4 °C	38.4 °C

Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C


34 °C	34.4 °C	38.7 °C
33.9 °C	34.5 °C	40 °C
33.9 °C	35 °C	40.8 °C

Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C

Conector de corriente 35.5 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Blackview A8 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.18 Watt
Ocioso	0.74 / 1.97 / 2.09 Watt
Carga	4.89 / 5.09 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh	Leagoo M5 2300 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-39%	-24%	-24%	16%	-7%	-74%
Idle Minimum *	0.74	1.41 -91%	0.86 -16%	0.81 -9%	0.59 20%	0.72 3%	1.83 -147%
Idle Average *	1.97	2.46 -25%	2.68 -36%	2.26 -15%	1.68 15%	1.87 5%	3.21 -63%
Idle Maximum *	2.09	2.83 -35%	2.78 -33%	2.39 -14%	1.79 14%	2 4%	3.45 -65%
Load Average *	4.89	5.15 -5%	5.33 -9%	6.97 -43%	4.22 14%	5.99 -22%	5.67 -16%
Load Maximum *	5.09	7.05 -39%	6.49 -28%	7.03 -38%	4.26 16%	6.45 -27%	9.16 -80%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería


WiFi Websurfing		8h 26min

	Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh	Leagoo M5 2300 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3	506	403 -20%	366 -28%	406 -20%	384 -24%	453 -10%	412 -19%

Pro

+ panel IPS HD

+ decente rendimiento (para un smartphone básico)

+ 16 GB de almacenamiento flash

+ 2 GB de RAM

+ calidad de la carcasa

+ LTE (incluye banda 20)

+ buen aguante de batería

Contra

- bajo contraste

- almacenamiento eMMC lento

- SoC no muy potente

- baja velocidad de transferencias WLAN

- caída de conexión ocasional

- teclas no iluminadas

Blackview A8 Max. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Blackview.

El Blackview A8 Max es un smartphone básico interesante. Por sólo 90 Euros, el A8 Max tiene una carcasa - para su precio - bastante decente y un buen rendimiento de sistema. La gestión de la temperatura es eficiente y el consumo de energía mdoerado, lo que tiene un efecto positivo en el aguante.

Además, el smartphone trae un display IPS razonablemente brillante, que ofrece una buena estabilidad de ángulo de visión y colores decentes.

Al mismo tiempo, el contraste del display es malo, el almacenamiento flash interno es lento y al módulo WLAN no sólo le falta rendimiento, sino que tampoco es 100% estable.

Los smartphones básicos precisan compromisos - y el Blackview A8 Max no es diferente en ese aspecto. Visto el precio, el A8 Max no obstante es una compra decente.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Blackview A8 Max - 2016-10-19 10/19/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado

85%

Teclado

61 / 75 → 82%

Ratón

89%

Conectividad

37 / 60 → 62%

Peso

90%

Battería

91%

Pantalla

79%

Rendimiento de juegos

7 / 63 → 12%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

30 / 70 → 42%

Temperatura

87%

Ruido

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Cámara

63%

Médio

67%

79%

Smartphone - media ponderada

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview A8 Max

Marcus Herbrich, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2016-10-28)