Breve análisis del Smartphone Blackview R7
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5C | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5C |
|
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 552 cd/m²
Contraste: 863:1 (Negro: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 14.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Coolpad Torino S IPS, 1280x720, 4.7" | LG K10 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Xiaomi Mi 5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 25% | 12% | 18% | 22% | 36% | |
Brightness middle | 552 | 312 -43% | 360 -35% | 370 -33% | 515 -7% | 598 8% |
Brightness | 526 | 302 -43% | 358 -32% | 355 -33% | 498 -5% | 566 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 79 -13% | 87 -4% | 92 1% | 93 2% | 90 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.64 | 0.15 77% | 0.45 30% | 0.28 56% | 0.49 23% | 0.51 20% |
Contrast | 863 | 2080 141% | 800 -7% | 1321 53% | 1051 22% | 1173 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11 | 8.2 25% | 6.8 38% | 6.7 39% | 6.2 44% | 3.5 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.8 | 16.5 21% | 11.3 46% | 17.8 14% | 11.4 45% | 6.1 71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.3 | 9.2 36% | 6.2 57% | 7.9 45% | 7.4 48% | 3.5 76% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.29 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.21 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 12996 50% | 9017 72% | 7975 82% | 9072 72% | 8664 75% | 6532 100% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida | |
↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida | |
↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 38 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
Blackview R7 | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
LG K10 | |
Honor 5C | |
Xiaomi Mi 5 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Blackview R7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Coolpad Torino S audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 1.41 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.83 / 3.21 / 3.45 Watt |
Carga |
5.67 / 9.16 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Blackview R7 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh | LG K10 2300 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 5 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 57% | 45% | 41% | 31% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 1.83 | 0.63 66% | 0.68 63% | 0.89 51% | 0.45 75% | |
Idle Average * | 3.21 | 1.37 57% | 2.2 31% | 2.07 36% | 1.68 48% | |
Idle Maximum * | 3.45 | 1.71 50% | 2.26 34% | 2.15 38% | 1.71 50% | |
Load Average * | 5.67 | 2.82 50% | 3.47 39% | 3.46 39% | 6.7 -18% | |
Load Maximum * | 9.16 | 3.36 63% | 3.71 59% | 5.18 43% | 9.18 -0% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Blackview R7 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh | LG K10 2300 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 5 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 412 | 517 25% | 397 -4% | 453 10% | 584 42% | 504 22% |
Pro
Contra
Si valoras el Blackview R7 por lo que es – un móvil mainstream barato y no realmente un smartphone insignia, nuestro veredicto es bastante positivo. El almacenamiento interno de 32 GB y 4 GB de RAM son casi demasiado para esta clase. La combinación con el SoC Helio P10 asegura un rendimiento de sistema fluido. Salvo por los botones dedicados, hasta la calidad del chasis convence.
Las cosas que no nos gustaron tanto incluyen el lentísimo lector de tarjetas microSD y la mala calidad de sonido del altavoz. La cámara principal de 13 MP, que normalmente basta en la práctica, tiene un fuerte tinte de color que afecta a la calidad de las fotos – quizá se pueda arreglar con una actualización software. Un peso de casi 200 gramos también es mucho para un smartphone de 5.5".
El R7 no puede cumplir las expectativas creadas por la buena hoja de especificaciones – hay demasiados sacrificios. Sin embargo, sigue siendo un buen paquete en general por unos 160 Euros.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Blackview R7
-
09/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich