Breve análisis del Smartphone Bluboo S8
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 95 %
Brillo con batería: 544.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 812:1 (Negro: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01
| Bluboo S8 SHARP, IPS, 5.7", 1440x720 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, 5.8", 2960x1440 | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL Super AMOLED, 5.7", 2560x1440 | Huawei Y7 IPS, 5.5", 1280x720 | LG Q6 IPS, 5.5", 2160x1080 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 5.5", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 90% | 88% | 9% | 21% | 89% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 5.6 ? 88% | 4.8 ? 89% | 59.2 ? -30% | 38 ? 17% | 4.8 ? 89% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 ? | 3.2 ? 91% | 4.8 ? 86% | 18.4 ? 47% | 26 ? 24% | 4 ? 88% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 | 231.5 | 2315 ? | 257.7 | ||
| Screen | 31% | 6% | 24% | 29% | 27% | |
| Brightness middle | 544.2 | 566 4% | 338 -38% | 467 -14% | 523 -4% | 454 -17% |
| Brightness | 539 | 564 5% | 341 -37% | 456 -15% | 498 -8% | 463 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 94 -1% | 90 -5% | 92 -3% | 88 -7% | 86 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.39 42% | 0.24 64% | |||
| Contrast | 812 | 1197 47% | 2179 168% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 2.7 64% | 3.7 50% | 4.3 42% | 6.4 14% | 2 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 5.4 50% | 7.9 27% | 6.8 37% | 11 -2% | 5.3 51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.1 | 3.1 62% | 4.9 40% | 3.5 57% | 7.4 9% | 1.7 79% |
| Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% | 2.35 94% | 2.4 92% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 8989 72% | 6335 103% | 7286 89% | 7273 89% | 8641 75% | 6394 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 | |||||
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 61% /
45% | 47% /
27% | 17% /
21% | 25% /
28% | 58% /
43% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 91 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 45.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 23.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 76 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ≤ 100 % de brillo |  | |
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Computer Vision score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Storage score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Work performance score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| High Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Medium Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| Epic Citadel | |
| Ultra High Quality | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| High Quality | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| High Performance | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Doogee Shoot 1 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL | |
| Sony Xperia XA1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Bluboo S8 | |
| LG Q6 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Bluboo S8 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S8 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei Y7 16 GB eMMC Flash | LG Q6 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 95% | 52% | -17% | 18% | -16% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 55.9 | 53.5 -4% | 62.6 12% | 62.6 12% | 62.6 12% | 63.9 14% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.9 | 63.9 -16% | 83.4 10% | 82.5 9% | 84.8 12% | 76.1 0% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.37 | 15.25 23% | 13.51 9% | 6.9 -44% | 9.2 -26% | 10.54 -15% |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.24 | 127.2 233% | 88.4 131% | 53.2 39% | 54.3 42% | 25.86 -32% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 77.6 | 193.2 149% | 142.8 84% | 33.2 -57% | 133.5 72% | 53 -32% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 281 | 793 182% | 458.9 63% | 119.4 -58% | 263.1 -6% | 198.5 -29% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Bluboo S8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.99 / 1.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.6 / 2.4 / 2.5 Watt |
| Carga |
6.5 / 4 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Bluboo S8 MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895, Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL SD 821, Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Huawei Y7 435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | LG Q6 435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash, Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 33% | 2% | 35% | 22% | 56% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.78 51% | 0.88 45% | 0.57 64% | 0.92 42% | 0.39 76% |
| Idle Average * | 2.4 | 1.1 54% | 1.24 48% | 1.61 33% | 2.19 9% | 1.06 56% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.5 | 1.16 54% | 1.26 50% | 1.62 35% | 2.24 10% | 1.08 57% |
| Load Average * | 6.5 | 4.15 36% | 7.71 -19% | 3.09 52% | 3.38 48% | 1.82 72% |
| Load Maximum * | 4 | 5.12 -28% | 8.64 -116% | 4.26 -7% | 4 -0% | 3.21 20% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Bluboo S8 MT6750, Mali-T860 MP2, Wh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895, Mali-G71 MP20, Wh | Asus ZenFone AR ZS571KL SD 821, Adreno 530, Wh | Huawei Y7 435, Adreno 505, 15.2 Wh | LG Q6 435, Adreno 505, 10.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 48% | 13% | 74% | 18% | 107% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1069 | 1667 56% | 1476 38% | 1914 79% | 1367 28% | 1950 82% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 390 | 719 84% | 444 14% | 716 84% | 502 29% | 904 132% |
| Load | 255 | 264 4% | 221 -13% | 402 58% | 251 -2% | 525 106% |
Pro
Contra
El Bluboo S8 se ve genial, se siente bien en la mano y tiene una pantalla sorprendentemente brillante de 18:9. Todo lo demás es simplemente tibio en el mejor de los casos o incluso no funciona en el peor.
Para empezar, los usuarios de América del Norte deben tener en cuenta que el Bluboo S8 no lleva las bandas 3G o 4G necesarios para la compatibilidad con los principales proveedores. Segundo, la aplicación del teléfono se colgaba en nuestra unidad, incluso después de actualizar a la última versión del software. La vibración es débil, los colores están apagados, al lector de huellas le cuesta varios intentos, la calidad de la cámara es granulada, el ruido estático parece estar en intervalos aleatorios, y la falta de un conector de audio resulta insultante, especialmente cuando los fundamentos básicos son tan erróneos. Tal vez simplemente recibimos una unidad defectuosa, pero al mismo tiempo, esto no refleja bien los estándares de calidad de Bluboo y la longevidad del dispositivo.
Un clon Galaxy S8 por fuera, pero un teléfono ultra-económico dentro. No esperamos mucho de un smartphone por menos de $150 USD, excepto por las funciones básicas, pero el Bluboo S8 ni siquiera puede recibir llamadas o conseguir que el altavoz funcione de manera fiable.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Bluboo S8
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
