Breve análisis del Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 485 cd/m²
Contraste: 970:1 (Negro: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.36
| Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -8% | -9% | -1% | -20% | 22% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 485 | 419 -14% | 451 -7% | 658 36% | 328 -32% | 378 -22% | 509 5% |
| Brightness | 481 | 431 -10% | 443 -8% | 633 32% | 334 -31% | 380 -21% | 511 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 93 3% | 93 3% | 88 -2% | 91 1% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.66 -32% | ||||
| Contrast | 970 | 1128 16% | 997 3% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.1 2% | 5.4 -29% | 4.9 -17% | 4.6 -10% | 1.95 54% | 2.2 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 12 -52% | 9.9 -25% | 9.1 -15% | 14.7 -86% | 3.09 61% | 5.8 27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.3 31% | 6.7 -40% | 5.8 -21% | 2.8 42% | 1.86 61% | 2 58% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.1 105% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7568 86% | 6550 99% | 8262 79% | 7840 83% | 6612 98% | 6376 102% | 6768 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 31 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 37 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash | ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 81% | -35% | 53% | 8% | 101% | 31% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 241.6 | 406.5 68% | 209.4 -13% | 282 17% | 247.5 2% | 408.7 69% | 254.8 5% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 82.1 | 150.9 84% | 60.4 -26% | 188 129% | 119.3 45% | 153.3 87% | 73.1 -11% |
| Random Read 4KB | 35.64 | 121.1 240% | 22.9 -36% | 74 108% | 34.16 -4% | 137.6 286% | 38.78 9% |
| Random Write 4KB | 30.12 | 16.22 -46% | 11.2 -63% | 7.4 -75% | 31.5 5% | 18.23 -39% | 45.58 51% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 41.64 | 78.4 88% | 79.2 90% | 53.7 29% | 74.6 79% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 33.32 | 51.3 54% | 50.1 50% | 23.59 -29% | 50.6 52% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 28 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.49 / 1.63 / 1.76 Watt |
| Carga |
2.98 / 4.99 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -36% | -35% | -28% | -29% | -19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.49 | 0.57 -16% | 0.78 -59% | 0.83 -69% | 0.64 -31% | 0.96 -96% |
| Idle Average * | 1.63 | 1.24 24% | 1.89 -16% | 2.11 -29% | 0.84 48% | 1.64 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.76 | 1.36 23% | 2.02 -15% | 2.12 -20% | 0.87 51% | 1.71 3% |
| Load Average * | 2.98 | 5.92 -99% | 5.28 -77% | 3.41 -14% | 6.02 -102% | 2.98 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.99 | 10.53 -111% | 5.44 -9% | 5.46 -9% | 10.45 -109% | 5.08 -2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -11% | -31% | -3% | -26% | 3% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2048 | 1338 -35% | 1487 -27% | 1502 -27% | 1735 -15% | 2323 13% | 2540 24% |
| H.264 | 732 | 847 16% | 526 -28% | 905 24% | 704 -4% | 672 -8% | 1190 63% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 820 | 840 2% | 499 -39% | 797 -3% | 411 -50% | 626 -24% | 824 0% |
| Load | 366 | 268 -27% | 255 -30% | 352 -4% | 245 -33% | 483 32% | 652 78% |
Pro
Contra
El Nova Plus de Huawei es un smartphone realmente bueno y solo podemos encontrar unos pequeños defectos menores. Además de la brillante pantalla obtienes dos cámaras realmente buenas. Los aficionados a los selfies disfrutaran particularmente de la cámara frontal. También dispone de una amplia batería, que realmente cumple la promesa de mantener el dispositivo en funcionamiento durante un día o más.
No obstante deberás hacer algunas concesiones respecto a la calidad de construcción, aunque no es algo demasiado grave. Es una pena que las aplicaciones no puedan guardarse en una tarjeta microSD opcional y que la ranura sea lenta. La Wi-Fi de 5.0 GHZ debería ser también algo a considerar en este rango de precios.
El Huawei Nova Plus es un buen dispositivo, con buenas cámaras y buena duración de batería.
Recomendamos la compra del Nova Plus, porque en conjunto es un gran dispositivo. Sin embargo, nunca esta de más echar un ojo a dispositivo de precio similar.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Huawei Nova Plus
- 12/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
