Breve análisis del Smartphone Lenovo Moto C Plus
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
|
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 492 cd/m²
Contraste: 2139:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
Lenovo Moto C Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto C TFT, 854x480, 5" | Gigaset GS170 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | LG K8 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Blackview P2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Blackview R6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -64% | -65% | -27% | -45% | -29% | -50% | -52% | -21% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 492 | 364 -26% | 418 -15% | 481 -2% | 358 -27% | 412 -16% | 424 -14% | 352 -28% | 522 6% | 566 15% |
Brightness | 472 | 355 -25% | 418 -11% | 469 -1% | 351 -26% | 414 -12% | 420 -11% | 320 -32% | 498 6% | 564 19% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 92 2% | 84 -7% | 93 3% | 94 4% | 85 -6% | 81 -10% | 86 -4% | 94 4% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.31 -35% | 0.45 -96% | 0.22 4% | 0.49 -113% | 0.42 -83% | 0.15 35% | 0.3 -30% | 0.23 -0% | |
Contrast | 2139 | 1174 -45% | 929 -57% | 2186 2% | 731 -66% | 981 -54% | 2827 32% | 1173 -45% | 2270 6% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 10.4 -93% | 9.7 -80% | 8.1 -50% | 7.1 -31% | 5.6 -4% | 9.5 -76% | 8.7 -61% | 6.9 -28% | 2.7 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12 | 18 -50% | 18.9 -58% | 15.4 -28% | 14.9 -24% | 9.7 19% | 19.7 -64% | 15.1 -26% | 12.3 -3% | 5.4 55% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 12.7 -243% | 11.3 -205% | 8.5 -130% | 6.5 -76% | 6.9 -86% | 14.5 -292% | 10.5 -184% | 9.2 -149% | 3.1 16% |
Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.04 108% | 2.27 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.4 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.04 108% | 2.38 92% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 7182 91% | 12904 50% | 10414 62% | 9014 72% | 8166 80% | 8422 77% | 10840 60% | 8529 76% | 8687 75% | 6335 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15 ms subida | |
↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 90 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida | |
↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus | |
Lenovo Moto C | |
Gigaset GS170 | |
Nokia 3 | |
LG K8 2017 | |
Blackview P2 | |
Blackview R6 | |
UMI Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54) | |
Blackview R6 (Chrome 55) | |
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58) | |
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57) | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60) | |
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54) | |
Blackview R6 (Chrome 55) | |
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57) | |
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58) | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89) | |
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60) | |
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60) | |
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
Lenovo Moto C Plus (Chrome Version 60) | |
Blackview P2 (Chrome Version 58) | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play (Chrome 50.0.2661.89) | |
Blackview R6 (Chrome 55) | |
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57) | |
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54) | |
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo Moto C Plus | Lenovo Moto C | Gigaset GS170 | Nokia 3 | LG K8 2017 | Lenovo Moto G4 Play | Blackview P2 | Blackview R6 | UMI Max | Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | 42% | 129% | 186% | 137% | 77% | 23% | 59% | 339% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 186.7 | 179.3 -4% | 197.9 6% | 181 -3% | 270.8 45% | 144.1 -23% | 264.8 42% | 228 22% | 257.9 38% | 793 325% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 44.45 | 44.55 0% | 44.79 1% | 34 -24% | 84.6 90% | 43.95 -1% | 133.8 201% | 76.1 71% | 69.5 56% | 193.2 335% |
Random Read 4KB | 18.1 | 18.37 1% | 18.34 1% | 17.7 -2% | 41.6 130% | 17.9 -1% | 22.07 22% | 18.73 3% | 26.66 47% | 127.2 603% |
Random Write 4KB | 15.4 | 10.9 -29% | 10.45 -32% | 5.5 -64% | 12.5 -19% | 28.31 84% | 9.54 -38% | 13.5 -12% | 10.91 -29% | 15.25 -1% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 13.5 | 13.5 0% | 37.41 ? 177% | 64.3 376% | 78.6 ? 482% | 65.5 385% | 34.26 ? 154% | 22.74 ? 68% | 36.64 ? 171% | 63.9 ? 373% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 10.7 | 10.7 0% | 21.34 ? 99% | 62.9 488% | 52.2 ? 388% | 51.1 378% | 19.61 ? 83% | 9.34 ? -13% | 18.07 ? 69% | 53.5 ? 400% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto C Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigaset GS170 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG K8 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.08 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.8 / 1.87 / 1.89 Watt |
Carga |
2.18 / 3.61 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Moto C Plus 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | LG K8 2017 2500 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Blackview P2 6000 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | 3% | -2% | -3% | -36% | -66% | -2% | -10% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.54 32% | 0.67 16% | 0.65 19% | 0.68 15% | 0.99 -24% | 0.78 2% | 1.02 -28% | 0.78 2% | |
Idle Average * | 1.87 | 1.56 17% | 1.35 28% | 1.6 14% | 1.58 16% | 2.04 -9% | 1.63 13% | 1.53 18% | 1.1 41% | |
Idle Maximum * | 1.89 | 1.6 15% | 1.39 26% | 1.62 14% | 1.61 15% | 2.12 -12% | 1.84 3% | 1.62 14% | 1.16 39% | |
Load Average * | 2.18 | 3.18 -46% | 3.1 -42% | 2.97 -36% | 3.36 -54% | 3.77 -73% | 7.47 -243% | 2.91 -33% | 4.15 -90% | |
Load Maximum * | 3.61 | 4.42 -22% | 4.02 -11% | 4.34 -20% | 3.91 -8% | 5.78 -60% | 7.47 -107% | 2.93 19% | 5.12 -42% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo Moto C Plus 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | LG K8 2017 2500 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Blackview P2 6000 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | ||||||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 858 | 517 -40% | 442 -48% | 552 -36% | 594 -31% | 630 -27% | 1083 26% | 604 -30% | 588 -31% | 719 -16% |
Pro
Contra
En comparación con el Moto C, Lenovo ha hecho los ajustes adecuados para el Moto C Plus. Está un nivel por encima de su equivalente de 5" sin el "Plus"adicional. El rendimiento del sistema y del navegador también ha mejorado un poco gracias al MediaTek SoC.
Pero teniendo en cuenta su precio, el Moto C Plus todavía no ofrece un gran paquete de rendimiento de CPU, GPU y los valores de acceso al almacenamiento. Sin embargo, el smartphone básico puede marcar algunos puntos con su largo aguante de la batería, cámara decente y Android 7.0 actualizado. El panel IPS 720-p tiene una alta luminosidad, un buen contraste y una buena visualización de color.
Lenovo ha facilitado bastante a los compradores potenciales elegir entre los dos modelos de Moto. Debido a la mínima diferencia en el precio, la versión Plus es definitivamente la elección correcta.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Moto C Plus
-
08/29/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich