Breve análisis del Smartphone Lenovo Moto G4 Play
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 412 cd/m²
Contraste: 981:1 (Negro: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.4
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | 22% | 7% | -9% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 412 | 586 42% | 346 -16% | 289 -30% | 518 26% | 418 1% |
| Brightness | 414 | 566 37% | 349 -16% | 291 -30% | 475 15% | 407 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 84 -11% | 93 -1% | 96 2% | 81 -14% | 95 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.57 -36% | 0.61 -45% | 0.49 -17% | ||
| Contrast | 981 | 1028 5% | 849 -13% | 853 -13% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 4.2 25% | 1.55 72% | 4.7 16% | 6.8 -21% | 3.92 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.7 | 8.4 13% | 7.3 25% | 11.4 -18% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 6.3 9% | 2.05 70% | 3 57% | 7 -1% | 3.81 45% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.39 92% | 2.15 102% | 2.03 108% | 2.35 94% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 8422 77% | 6614 98% | 6267 104% | 6291 103% | 8151 80% | 7361 88% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 31 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 95 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 39 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XA | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.22 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.68 / 1.58 / 1.61 Watt |
| Carga |
3.36 / 3.91 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -50% | -12% | 14% | -11% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.68 | 1.15 -69% | 0.9 -32% | 0.61 10% | 0.72 -6% | 0.4 41% |
| Idle Average * | 1.58 | 2.09 -32% | 1.2 24% | 1.41 11% | 1.5 5% | 1 37% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.61 | 2.17 -35% | 1.4 13% | 1.51 6% | 1.57 2% | 1.2 25% |
| Load Average * | 3.36 | 5.38 -60% | 3.8 -13% | 2.56 24% | 3.48 -4% | 2.9 14% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.91 | 6.08 -55% | 5.9 -51% | 3.1 21% | 6.04 -54% | 5 -28% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh | Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 52% | -40% | 2% | -46% | -16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1998 | 1154 -42% | 1599 -20% | 775 -61% | 1364 -32% | |
| H.264 | 683 | 465 -32% | 658 -4% | 460 -33% | 677 -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 630 | 959 52% | 368 -42% | 643 2% | 353 -44% | 526 -17% |
| Load | 306 | 176 -42% | 402 31% | 170 -44% | 264 -14% |
Pro
Contra
"Motorola trae un smartphone de clase media en su Moto G, con impresionantes características especiales." Esta frase fue el veredicto del Moto G 3ª generación. Podemos aplicarlo directamente al Moto G4. El modelo de pruebas combina buen hardware y rendimiento sólido, sin ningún defecto evidente. Comparado con el predecesor, el Moto G4 tiene un SoC más rápido, más espacio de almacenamiento, y un display por menos precio. Si quieres un smartphone bueno y barato, recoemndamos pagar 159 Euros por el Moto G4 Play.
El Lenovo Moto G4 Play es un paquete bien rematado, que incluye un smartphone de gama media con puntos fuertes específicos por un precio relativamente bajo.
El teléfono tiene algunos defectos: el altavoz no es muy potente y las cámaras no impresionarán al usuario. No soporta NFC y el contenido mostrado sólo se puede transferir a un TV usando Chromecast. También echamos en falta el cable Micro-USB separado.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Moto G4 Play
- 11/01/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
