Breve análisis del Smartphone OnePlus 3T
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Negro: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.23
| OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 IPS, 1334x750, 4.7" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 50% | 31% | 33% | 19% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 421 | 556 32% | 445 6% | 582 38% | 419 0% | 350 -17% |
| Brightness | 430 | 519 21% | 434 1% | 563 31% | 431 0% | 351 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 84 0% | 98 17% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.38 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 1.3 82% | 2.8 61% | 4.4 38% | 4.1 42% | 2.04 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.3 | 2.6 83% | 5.8 62% | 7.4 52% | 12 22% | 3.25 79% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 1.9 72% | 3.7 46% | 4.8 29% | 3.3 51% | 1.63 76% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 7866 83% | 6818 95% | 7164 91% | 6175 105% | 6550 99% | 6391 102% |
| Contrast | 1635 | 1236 | 1532 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.15 | 77.78 | 89.38 | 86.86 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.71 | 99.44 | 100 | 99.35 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 244 Hz |  | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 244 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) . La frecuencia de 244 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8702 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 5 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 26 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 11 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 5 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 21 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| OnePlus 3T | Apple iPhone 7 | HTC 10 | Huawei P9 | OnePlus 3 | Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -56% | -49% | -19% | -28% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB | 436.4 | 275.1 -37% | 281.3 -36% | 408.7 -6% | 483.8 11% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 165.3 | 115.6 -30% | 72.2 -56% | 153.3 -7% | 145.7 -12% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 123.6 | 29.92 -76% | 39 -68% | 137.6 11% | 85.9 -31% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 74.4 | 15.89 -79% | 47.45 -36% | 18.23 -75% | 16.01 -78% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.3 | 55 | 72.3 | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.4 | 24.83 | 53.6 |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 59 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.12 / 0.28 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.61 / 1.77 / 1.81 Watt |
| Carga |
6.67 / 10.98 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 0% | 3% | 15% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.54 11% | 0.68 -11% | 0.77 -26% | 0.57 7% | 0.68 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 1.77 | 1.51 15% | 1.49 16% | 2.36 -33% | 1.24 30% | 1.02 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.81 | 1.54 15% | 1.91 -6% | 2.37 -31% | 1.36 25% | 1.14 37% |
| Load Average * | 6.67 | 3.75 44% | 7.4 -11% | 3.09 54% | 5.92 11% | 4.73 29% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.98 | 5.01 54% | 9.71 12% | 5.35 51% | 10.53 4% | 7.16 35% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -9% | -19% | -9% | 16% | 4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1423 | 1770 24% | 1273 -11% | 1514 6% | 1338 -6% | 1810 27% |
| H.264 | 810 | 722 -11% | 648 -20% | 568 -30% | 847 5% | 892 10% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 494 | 517 5% | 413 -16% | 569 15% | 840 70% | 456 -8% |
| Load | 282 | 126 -55% | 203 -28% | 206 -27% | 268 -5% | 242 -14% |
Pro
Contra
El OnePlus 3T es un sucesor válido del OnePlus 3. Sin embargo, la tarea no ha sido muy complicada para el fabricante ya que el modelo anterior ya era uno de los mejores smartphones Android de gama alta. Los cambios para el OnePlus 3T también son bastante menores.
Actualización exitosa: El OnePlus 3T es una pequeña actualización del OnePlus 3 y es por tanto uno de los mejores smartphones de gama alta, como lo fue el anterior.
Si ya tienes el OnePlus 3, no necesitas el OnePlus 3T, pero los demás pueden hacerse con él. A los compradores probablemente les guste que haya por fin una versión de 128 GB del smartphone. Es sólo 40 Euros más cara que la versión de 64 GB en la tienda online del fabricante, por lo que resulta particularmente interesante dada la falta del lector de microSD. El SoC ligeramente más rápido es un buen añadido, pero la diferencia en la práctica es escasa debido a las temperaturas similares.
OnePlus ha equipado al nuevo 3T con una batería más grande, pero sigue a la par con el OnePlus 3 debido al mayor consumo de energía. No queremos dar mucha importancia al desliz en el test WLAN ya que el modelo anterior también tuvo este problema al principio y luego se arregló con una actualización de OxygenOS. Se ha anunciado una actualización a Android 7 para diciembre.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
OnePlus 3T
- 12/12/2016 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
