Breve análisis del Smartphone Oukitel K6000 Plus
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Blackview R6 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Blackview R6 |
|
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 369 cd/m²
Contraste: 710:1 (Negro: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.51
Oukitel K6000 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia E5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Oukitel U16 Max 1280x720, 6" | LG K10 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Doogee Shoot 1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Blackview R6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 55% | 32% | 27% | 62% | 20% | |
Brightness middle | 369 | 538 46% | 417 13% | 384 4% | 488 32% | 352 -5% |
Brightness | 352 | 534 52% | 405 15% | 350 -1% | 462 31% | 320 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 96 10% | 94 8% | 85 -2% | 89 2% | 81 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.33 37% | 0.21 60% | 0.36 31% | 0.23 56% | 0.3 42% |
Contrast | 710 | 1630 130% | 1986 180% | 1067 50% | 2122 199% | 1173 65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.5 | 5.7 46% | 11.9 -13% | 6 43% | 5 52% | 8.7 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.4 | 11 49% | 21.5 -0% | 14 35% | 8.3 61% | 15.1 29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.9 | 4.7 66% | 14.4 -4% | 5.9 58% | 4.8 65% | 10.5 24% |
Gamma | 2.51 88% | 2.51 88% | 2.19 100% | 2 110% | 2.4 92% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 12118 54% | 7264 89% | 12820 51% | 8042 81% | 7427 88% | 8529 76% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 2688 Hz | ≤ 1 % de brillo | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 2688 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 1 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 2688 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12.8 ms subida | |
↘ 12.8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
40.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21.2 ms subida | |
↘ 19.6 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
GFXBench | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Honor 6X | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Honor 6X |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 | |
Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Oukitel K6000 Plus | |
Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
Blackview R6 | |
Doogee Shoot 1 | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Honor 6X | |
Sony Xperia E5 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Oukitel K6000 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia E5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG K10 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (39% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.04 / 0.32 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.88 / 2.02 / 2.09 Watt |
Carga |
5.33 / 7.74 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Oukitel K6000 Plus 6080 mAh | Acer Liquid Z6 Plus 4080 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | Blackview P2 6000 mAh | Doogee Shoot 1 3300 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | 1% | 8% | 31% | 17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.88 | 0.48 45% | 0.78 11% | 0.99 -13% | 0.73 17% | 0.82 7% |
Idle Average * | 2.02 | 1.55 23% | 1.63 19% | 2.04 -1% | 1.48 27% | 2 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.09 | 1.61 23% | 1.84 12% | 2.12 -1% | 1.58 24% | 2.03 3% |
Load Average * | 5.33 | 5.2 2% | 7.47 -40% | 3.77 29% | 3.11 42% | 3.34 37% |
Load Maximum * | 7.74 | 5.68 27% | 7.47 3% | 5.78 25% | 4.37 44% | 4.92 36% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Oukitel K6000 Plus 6080 mAh | Acer Liquid Z6 Plus 4080 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | Blackview P2 6000 mAh | Doogee Shoot 1 3300 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 26% | -30% | 26% | -42% | 11% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 861 | 1087 26% | 604 -30% | 1083 26% | 501 -42% | 957 11% |
Load | 351 | 203 | 563 | 375 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1957 | 2250 | ||||
H.264 | 885 |
Pro
Contra
El Oukitel K6000 es un smartphone que llama la atención. la cubierta trasera de aluminio y los colores a juego son las principales razones para esto. El comprador no debería dejarse llevar por la gran batería; su duración es lo realmente importante - y no es muy superior a la de un smartphone comparable. Además, la enorme batería es la razón por la que el K6000 Plus pesa mucho para ser de 5,5" con sus más de 200 gramos. El rendimiento también es peor del esperado en la práctica.
El K6000 Plus viene con el Android 7 más actual. Los extras que Oukitel añade para un acceso más rápido y uso facilitado lo hacen atractivo - el K6000 Plus sirve para uso diario y no es sólo la configuración de la memoria que lo remarca. Como sea, puede que se caiga de la lista en vista de la creciente demanda de imagen y sonido. Aunque la cámara es buena para fotos con luz natural quitando su falta de nitidez en los detalles, solo es útil en poca luz si añades los LED. El sonido es incluso peor: Los usuarios que quieran escuchar música o vídeos sin cascos deberían buscar en otro lado.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Oukitel K6000 Plus
- 06/28/2017 v6 (old)
Inge Schwabe