Breve análisis del Smartphone Oukitel U16 Max
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 417 cd/m²
Contraste: 1986:1 (Negro: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 14.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
| Oukitel U16 Max 1280x720, 6" | Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Elephone P8000 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Z6 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG Stylus 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -21% | -16% | 2% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 417 | 312 -25% | 338 -19% | 419 0% | 370 -11% |
| Brightness | 405 | 315 -22% | 329 -19% | 408 1% | 374 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 87 -7% | 95 1% | 83 -12% | 92 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.56 -167% | 0.36 -71% | 0.35 -67% | 0.25 -19% |
| Contrast | 1986 | 557 -72% | 939 -53% | 1197 -40% | 1480 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.9 | 6.8 43% | 9.38 21% | 6.6 45% | 6.1 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.5 | 14 35% | 12.6 41% | 16.5 23% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.4 | 7.1 51% | 10.33 28% | 7.9 45% | 7 51% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.77 79% | 2.3 96% | 2.08 106% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 12820 51% | 7402 88% | 10118 64% | 8576 76% | 8350 78% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 72 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 50 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Ulefone Metal audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.06 / 0.08 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.93 / 2.23 / 2.31 Watt |
| Carga |
5.61 / 8.26 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Oukitel U16 Max 4000 mAh | Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | Elephone P8000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z6 Plus 4080 mAh | LG Stylus 2 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -45% | -36% | 25% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1573 | 1225 -22% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 731 | 403 -45% | 637 -13% | 1087 49% | 663 -9% |
| Load | 346 | 146 -58% | 351 1% | 258 -25% | |
| H.264 | 697 |
Pro
Contra
Si imaginamos un público objetivo que quiere un smartphone enorme con una gran pantalla, que no le importe que pese mucho, y que sea barato estando dispuesto a aceptar las correspondientes limitaciones, tenemos que admitir que Oukitel ha construido un paquete atractivo.
Un paquete bueno y equilibrado, si al menos las cámaras fueran mejores.
El dispositivo es sólido, tiene una gran pantalla, y una batería grande. La velocidad no es sobresaliente, pero a ese precio no podemos esperar más. La resolución del display no está al día, aunque probablemente no se noten las diferencias sin mirar las especificaciones. Son principalmente las cámaras las que provocan crítica seria. Por desgracia, sólo son adecuadas para las instantáneas con buena iluminación. Si en vez de la alta resolución tuvieran una calidad mejor, recomendaríamos el dispositivo. Tal cual está, es meramente una recomendación low-cost con reservas.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Oukitel U16 Max
- 05/26/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar
Price comparison
