Breve análisis del Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 98 %
Brillo con batería: 566 cd/m²
Contraste: 1068:1 (Negro: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.14
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact IPS, 1280x720, 4.6" | Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Xiaomi Mi 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8" | Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 34% | 24% | 23% | 22% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 566 | 604 7% | 426 -25% | 620 10% | 566 0% | 620 10% |
| Brightness | 560 | 580 4% | 431 -23% | 586 5% | 564 1% | 610 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 93 -5% | 89 -9% | 94 -4% | 93 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.44 17% | 0.28 47% | 0.79 -49% | ||
| Contrast | 1068 | 1373 29% | 2214 107% | 785 -26% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 1.2 74% | 1.6 65% | 4.8 -4% | 2.7 41% | 4.2 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.4 | 2.3 76% | 4.1 56% | 8.8 6% | 5.4 43% | 5.8 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 1.6 75% | 1.7 74% | 5.3 18% | 3.1 52% | 3.9 40% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.15 102% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 8189 79% | 6688 97% | 6329 103% | 7473 87% | 6335 103% | 7086 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 2358 Hz | ≤ 25 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 2358 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 25 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 2358 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 29 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 56 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 27 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 29 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 92 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact | OnePlus 5 | Xiaomi Mi 6 | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 29% | 37% | 13% | 14% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 668 | 748 12% | 728 9% | 793 19% | 679 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 119.9 | 201.5 68% | 196.7 64% | 193.2 61% | 204.4 70% |
| Random Read 4KB | 113.3 | 141 24% | 143.5 27% | 127.2 12% | 156.6 38% |
| Random Write 4KB | 17.13 | 19.3 13% | 25.19 47% | 15.25 -11% | 14.93 -13% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.3 ? | 63.9 ? -13% | 65.5 ? -11% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 50.2 ? | 53.5 ? 7% | 47.71 ? -5% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.24 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.58 / 1.76 / 1.81 Watt |
| Carga |
6.33 / 9.18 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 1% | 15% | 23% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.58 | 0.54 7% | 0.73 -26% | 0.45 22% | 0.78 -34% | 0.51 12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.63 7% | 1.44 18% | 1.67 5% | 1.1 37% | 2.16 -23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.81 | 1.67 8% | 1.5 17% | 1.69 7% | 1.16 36% | 2.23 -23% |
| Load Average * | 6.33 | 2.74 57% | 6.91 -9% | 4.07 36% | 4.15 34% | 7.45 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.18 | 7.78 15% | 8.51 7% | 8.54 7% | 5.12 44% | 9.28 -1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh | Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -26% | -27% | 0% | -13% | -31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2655 | 1629 -39% | 1534 -42% | 1667 -37% | 1612 -39% | |
| H.264 | 866 | 698 -19% | 623 -28% | 771 -11% | 580 -33% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 736 | 585 -21% | 518 -30% | 739 0% | 719 -2% | 601 -18% |
| Load | 266 | 202 -24% | 247 -7% | 264 -1% | 172 -35% |
Pro
Contra
El Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact es un smartphone de gama alta con 4.6" de display, y un formato tan pequeño no abunda. Si buscas un potente smartphone que pueda manejarse fácilmente a una mano, definitivamente es el dispositivo para ti. Pero el Xperia XZ1 Compact, a 599 Euros (~$700, versión USA $599), es más que su pequeño tamaño y fuerte rendimiento.
Una de las atracciones obvias es el sistema operativo Android 8.0 – a fecha de redacción, este es el único smartphones con el nuevo SO. Y la lista de pros continúa: un módulo WLAN rápido como el rayo, buenas cámaras, buenos altavoces, brillante display HD de iluminación homogénea, y un aguante de batería satisfactoriamente grande. Bajo el capó, el SoC gama alta Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 se asegura de que todo vaya como la seda.
Formato pequeño, hardware de primera, y Android 8.0 – los tres se unen en el Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact.
No hay nada serio que criticar del Xperia XZ1 Compact. Que no se pueda cambiar la batería es soportable. Sin embargo, la carcasa puede ser un escollo para algunas personas. Con sus bordes duros y esquinas afiladas, así como sus espacios vacíos relativamente grandes sobre y bajo el display, el diseño no será del agrado de todos.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
- 11/28/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
