Breve análisis del Smartphone UMI Plus
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 432.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1866:1 (Negro: 0.232 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.18 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4
| UMI Plus LTPS, 5.5", 1920x1080 | UMI Max Sharp, IPS, 5.5", 1920x1080 | Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 5.2", 1920x1080 | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 5.5", 2560x1440 | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 5.5", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -25% | -88% | 88% | -47% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 40 ? -11% | 52 ? -44% | 4.8 ? 87% | 56 ? -56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 36 ? -38% | 60 ? -131% | 3.2 ? 88% | 36 ? -38% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | ||||
| Screen | -13% | -13% | -11% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 432.8 | 522 21% | 544 26% | 328 -24% | 658 52% |
| Brightness | 430 | 498 16% | 521 21% | 334 -22% | 633 47% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 86 0% | 93 8% | 88 2% | 93 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.232 | 0.23 1% | 0.37 -59% | 0.66 -184% | |
| Contrast | 1866 | 2270 22% | 1470 -21% | 997 -47% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.93 | 6.9 -40% | 5.8 -18% | 4.6 7% | 4.9 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.34 | 12.3 -47% | 9.8 -18% | 14.7 -76% | 9.1 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.18 | 9.2 -78% | 7.2 -39% | 2.8 46% | 5.8 -12% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.38 92% | 2.18 101% | 2.29 96% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 7461 87% | 8687 75% | 8619 75% | 6612 98% | 7840 83% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -19% /
-15% | -51% /
-28% | 39% /
14% | -33% /
-24% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 59 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Work performance score | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Max | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
| UMI Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Plus | |
| UMI Max | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| UMI Plus | |
| UMI Max | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| UMI Max | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Coolpad Modena 2 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
UMI Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.36 / 0.64 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.6 / 3.2 / 3.3 Watt |
| Carga |
7.7 / 4.8 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| UMI Plus Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, , LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | UMI Max Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Sony Xperia XZ 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash, AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 625, Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 53% | -19% | 25% | 36% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 1.02 61% | 1.76 32% | 0.64 75% | 0.83 68% |
| Idle Average * | 3.2 | 1.53 52% | 3.6 -13% | 0.84 74% | 2.11 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.3 | 1.62 51% | 4.06 -23% | 0.87 74% | 2.12 36% |
| Load Average * | 7.7 | 2.91 62% | 7 9% | 6.02 22% | 3.41 56% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.8 | 2.93 39% | 9.52 -98% | 10.45 -118% | 5.46 -14% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| UMI Plus Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, Wh | UMI Max Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, Wh | Sony Xperia XZ 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 11 Wh | ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, Wh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 625, Adreno 506, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 5% | -24% | -4% | 26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1319 | 1125 -15% | 1735 32% | 1502 14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 561 | 588 5% | 438 -22% | 411 -27% | 797 42% |
| Load | 292 | 187 -36% | 245 -16% | 352 21% |
Pro
Contra
UMI ha creado un buen smartphone con especificaciones muy potentes por menos de 200$. Rinde tan bien como uno esperaría de un smartphone de gama media sin escatimar características populares como el lector de huellas, lector de tarjetas MicroSD o incluso un puerto USB Type-C. Encapsula todo dentro de un diseño robusto. y tendrás un teléfono difícil de mejorar por este precio.
Al igual que la mayoría de dispositivos baratos, sin embargo, el diablo se esconde en los detalles. Sus dimensiones son poco contenitas para un smartphone de 5.5 pulgadas y la calidad de la cámara posterior es el correspondiente a un dispositivo barato. La calidad del altavoz es escasa y sus botones podrían tener un mejor retorno al ser pulsados. La calidad de la recepción de llamadas no fue demasiado buen en nuestra zona y puede carecer de cobertura 4G en determinadas zonas. La vibración es escasa y el GPS es de precisión media.
Si la lista de inconvenientes no es un problema para su uso diario, los potenciales compradores deberían estar satisfechos con su rendimiento y la calidad global del UMI Plus.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
UMI Plus
- 11/27/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
