Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Max

Name: UMI Max
Brand: UMI

USB Type-C a un precio básico. Por un PVP de 150 Euros, los chinos de UMi ofrecen un paquete interesante: hardware potente, batería de 4,000 mAh, y un moderno puerto USB Type-C.

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (traducido por Francisco García), Published 11/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de gearbest.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

UMI Max

Procesador

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Adaptador gráfico

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memoría

3 GB

, LPDDR3

pantalla

5.50 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 401 PPI, capacitiva multitáctil, Sharp, IPS, 2.5D, Corning Gorilla Glas 3, lustroso: si

Disco duro

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, Samsung, 10.4 GB libre

Conexiones

1 USB 2.0, Audio Conexiones: clavija headset 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD hasta 256 GB, 1 Lector de Huellas Digitales, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: G, Glonass, P, L, Acelerómetro, Brújula, Giroscopio, Hall, Smart-Key, OTG, Status-LED, Miracast

Equipamento de red

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1800(B3)/1900(B2) || WCDMA: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1900(B2)/2100(B1) | LTE FDD: 2100(B1)/1800(B3)/2600(B7)/800(B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 8.5 x 150.8 x 75

Battería

4000 mAh Litio-Ion, Duración de la Batería (según el fabricante): 360 h

Sistema Operativo

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix Cámara Panasonic, flash dual
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix GalaxyCore GC5005

Características adicionales

Altavoces: Mono, Teclado: virtual, Luz de Teclado: si, adaptador modular de corriente, cable USB, UMi UI, 12 Meses Garantía, SAR n.b., fanless

Peso

199 g, Suministro de Electricidad: 27 g

Precio

150 Euros

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
UMI Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	98.8 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
UMI Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	103 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	491 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	109 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	360 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79.4 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.3 MBit/s

Comparación de Imágenes

Elige una escena y navega dentro de la primera imagen. Un click cambia el nivel de zoom. Un click en la imagen aumentada abre la original en una ventana nueva. La primera imagen muestra la fotografía escalada del dispositivo de pruebas.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click para cargar imágenes

UMi Max

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Cannon EOS 70D

click para cargar imágenes

UMi Max

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Cannon EOS 70D

click para cargar imágenes

UMi Max

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Cannon EOS 70D


484 cd/m²	503 cd/m²	537 cd/m²
481 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	532 cd/m²
463 cd/m²	463 cd/m²	500 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

Sharp tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 537 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 498.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20.26 cd/m²
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 2270:1 (Negro: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.38

	UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	UMI Touch IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Coolpad Torino S IPS, 1280x720, 4.7"	ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Acer Liquid Z630S IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Leagoo Shark 1 IPS, 1920x1080, 6"	UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-24%	-22%	-14%	-51%	-3%	-52%	4%	-15%
Brightness middle	522	424 -19%	360 -31%	312 -40%	552 6%	350 -33%	471 -10%	418 -20%	515 -1%
Brightness	498	415 -17%	358 -28%	302 -39%	526 6%	345 -31%	465 -7%	410 -18%	498 0%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	87 1%	79 -8%	91 6%	84 -2%	82 -5%	85 -1%	93 8%
Black Level *	0.23	0.54 -135%	0.45 -96%	0.15 35%	0.64 -178%	0.27 -17%	0.9 -291%	0.31 -35%	0.49 -113%
Contrast	2270	785 -65%	800 -65%	2080 -8%	863 -62%	1296 -43%	523 -77%	1348 -41%	1051 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.9	6.9 -0%	6.8 1%	8.2 -19%	11 -59%	4.7 32%	7.1 -3%	4.4 36%	6.2 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.3	10.9 11%	11.3 8%	16.5 -34%	20.8 -69%	8.5 31%	17 -38%	6.5 47%	11.4 7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.2	6.8 26%	6.2 33%	9.2 -0%	14.3 -55%	5.6 39%	7.5 18%	3.6 61%	7.4 20%
Gamma	2.38 ^92%	1.99 ^111%	2.14 ^103%	2.29 ^96%	2.21 ^100%	1.84 ^120%	2.23 ^99%	2.36 ^93%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	8687 ^75%	8131 ^80%	7975 ^82%	9017 ^72%	12996 ^50%	6795 ^96%	8261 ^79%	6993 ^93%	8664 ^75%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 15 ms subida
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 93 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 17 ms subida
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 23 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	18.07 MB/s
UMI Touch	21.02 MB/s +16%
Coolpad Torino S	16.54 MB/s -8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.62 MB/s -30%
Blackview R7	11.87 MB/s -34%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17.88 MB/s -1%
Honor 5C	24.21 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Moto Z	45.64 MB/s +153%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	36.64 MB/s
UMI Touch	42.92 MB/s +17%
Coolpad Torino S	25.79 MB/s -30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	22.77 MB/s -38%
Blackview R7	15.56 MB/s -58%
UMI Super Euro Edition	36.22 MB/s -1%
Honor 5C	51.9 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Moto Z	78.5 MB/s +114%
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	10.91 MB/s
UMI Touch	14.63 MB/s +34%
Coolpad Torino S	6.94 MB/s -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.26 MB/s -24%
Blackview R7	11.4 MB/s +4%
Acer Liquid Z630S	5.82 MB/s -47%
Leagoo Shark 1	6.4 MB/s -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11.88 MB/s +9%
Honor 5C	15.7 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Moto Z	74.9 MB/s +587%
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	26.66 MB/s
UMI Touch	19.88 MB/s -25%
Coolpad Torino S	18.34 MB/s -31%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	18.24 MB/s -32%
Blackview R7	28.02 MB/s +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S	28.43 MB/s +7%
Leagoo Shark 1	29.6 MB/s +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition	28.17 MB/s +6%
Honor 5C	61.7 MB/s +131%
Lenovo Moto Z	117.2 MB/s +340%
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	69.5 MB/s
UMI Touch	72.5 MB/s +4%
Coolpad Torino S	41.81 MB/s -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	70.3 MB/s +1%
Blackview R7	122.7 MB/s +77%
Acer Liquid Z630S	67.7 MB/s -3%
Leagoo Shark 1	39.6 MB/s -43%
UMI Super Euro Edition	126.9 MB/s +83%
Honor 5C	75.5 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Moto Z	168.3 MB/s +142%
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	257.9 MB/s
UMI Touch	219.3 MB/s -15%
Coolpad Torino S	140.3 MB/s -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	187.3 MB/s -27%
Blackview R7	247.6 MB/s -4%
Acer Liquid Z630S	249 MB/s -3%
Leagoo Shark 1	264.1 MB/s +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition	257.8 MB/s 0%
Honor 5C	263 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Moto Z	439.7 MB/s +70%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	49057 Points
UMI Touch	38617 Points -21%
Coolpad Torino S	22766 Points -54%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	23822 Points -51%
Blackview R7	50572 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	35585 Points -27%
Leagoo Shark 1	34261 Points -30%
UMI Super Euro Edition	50072 Points +2%
Honor 5C	53143 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points +163%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Touch	626 Points
Coolpad Torino S	494 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	404 Points
Honor 5C	906 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	2080 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Touch	2798 Points
Coolpad Torino S	1511 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1147 Points
Honor 5C	3914 Points
Lenovo Moto Z	5450 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	2701 Points
Blackview R7	2851 Points +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2818 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points +46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	734 Points
Blackview R7	728 Points -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition	727 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points +102%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	10942 Points
UMI Touch	6795 Points -38%
Coolpad Torino S	4430 Points -60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3070 Points -72%
Blackview R7	10762 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6868 Points -37%
Leagoo Shark 1	5568 Points -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10791 Points -1%
Honor 5C	11755 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points +130%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	10612 Points
UMI Touch	6186 Points -42%
Coolpad Torino S	3858 Points -64%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2645 Points -75%
Blackview R7	10334 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6250 Points -41%
Leagoo Shark 1	4920 Points -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10567 Points 0%
Honor 5C	11319 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points +151%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	12239 Points
UMI Touch	10368 Points -15%
Coolpad Torino S	9205 Points -25%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	7026 Points -43%
Blackview R7	12585 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	10508 Points -14%
Leagoo Shark 1	10325 Points -16%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11654 Points -5%
Honor 5C	13588 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	598 Points
UMI Touch	291 Points -51%
Coolpad Torino S	52 Points -91%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	124 Points -79%
Blackview R7	590 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	278 Points -54%
Leagoo Shark 1	278 Points -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition	595 Points -1%
Honor 5C	563 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points +406%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	521 Points
UMI Touch	241 Points -54%
Coolpad Torino S	41 Points -92%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	101 Points -81%
Blackview R7	518 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	229 Points -56%
Leagoo Shark 1	232 Points -55%
UMI Super Euro Edition	523 Points 0%
Honor 5C	480 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points +614%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	1239 Points
UMI Touch	1045 Points -16%
Coolpad Torino S	735 Points -41%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	618 Points -50%
Blackview R7	1155 Points -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1113 Points -10%
Leagoo Shark 1	890 Points -28%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1144 Points -8%
Honor 5C	1418 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points +48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	17 fps
UMI Touch	12 fps -29%
Coolpad Torino S	5.3 fps -69%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.2 fps -52%
Blackview R7	17 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	21 fps +24%
Leagoo Shark 1	8.7 fps -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition	18 fps +6%
Honor 5C	20 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps +212%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	17 fps
UMI Touch	12 fps -29%
Coolpad Torino S	9.8 fps -42%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	4.9 fps -71%
Blackview R7	17 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12 fps -29%
Leagoo Shark 1	8.9 fps -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17 fps 0%
Honor 5C	19 fps +12%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps +353%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	7.1 fps
UMI Touch	4.5 fps -37%
Coolpad Torino S	1.8 fps -75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.8 fps -75%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S	9 fps +27%
Leagoo Shark 1	3.9 fps -45%
UMI Super Euro Edition	7.5 fps +6%
Honor 5C	8.4 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps +266%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	7.1 fps
UMI Touch	4.5 fps -37%
Coolpad Torino S	4.3 fps -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3.4 fps -52%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S	4.2 fps -41%
Leagoo Shark 1	4.2 fps -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition	7.1 fps 0%
Honor 5C	7.9 fps +11%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps +477%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	4.7 fps
UMI Touch	2.9 fps -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.2 fps -74%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -47%
Leagoo Shark 1	2.2 fps -53%
UMI Super Euro Edition	5.1 fps +9%
Honor 5C	4.9 fps +4%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps +219%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	4.7 fps
UMI Touch	2.9 fps -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2.5 fps -47%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -47%
Leagoo Shark 1	2.5 fps -47%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4.7 fps 0%
Honor 5C	4.5 fps -4%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +474%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	4485 Points
UMI Touch	3787 Points -16%
Coolpad Torino S	3932 Points -12%
Blackview R7	4364 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	3814 Points -15%
Leagoo Shark 1	3398 Points -24%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4596 Points +2%
Honor 5C	5120 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +70%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	341 Points
UMI Touch	717 Points +110%
Coolpad Torino S	602 Points +77%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	448 Points +31%
Blackview R7	338 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	691 Points +103%
Leagoo Shark 1	597 Points +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1043 Points +206%
Honor 5C	1225 Points +259%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points +591%
System (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	2123 Points
UMI Touch	1343 Points -37%
Coolpad Torino S	1102 Points -48%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	801 Points -62%
Blackview R7	1971 Points -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1614 Points -24%
Leagoo Shark 1	1195 Points -44%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2187 Points +3%
Honor 5C	2600 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points +60%
Memory (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	998 Points
UMI Touch	787 Points -21%
Coolpad Torino S	607 Points -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	487 Points -51%
Blackview R7	1030 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S	540 Points -46%
Leagoo Shark 1	515 Points -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1052 Points +5%
Honor 5C	1504 Points +51%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points +119%
Graphics (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	666 Points
UMI Touch	429 Points -36%
Coolpad Torino S	321 Points -52%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	174 Points -74%
Blackview R7	655 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S	416 Points -38%
Leagoo Shark 1	418 Points -37%
UMI Super Euro Edition	666 Points 0%
Honor 5C	814 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points +549%
Web (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	10 Points
UMI Touch	576 Points +5660%
Coolpad Torino S	599 Points +5890%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	592 Points +5820%
Blackview R7	10 Points 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	627 Points +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1	611 Points +6010%
UMI Super Euro Edition	771 Points +7610%
Honor 5C	707 Points +6970%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points +9490%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	25.5 Points
UMI Touch	17.61 Points -31%
Coolpad Torino S	14.45 Points -43%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.73 Points -50%
Blackview R7	25.35 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S	19.03 Points -25%
Leagoo Shark 1	17.24 Points -32%
UMI Super Euro Edition	26.21 Points +3%
Honor 5C	27.93 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points +86%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	9796 ms *
UMI Touch	13953 ms * -42%
Coolpad Torino S	15784 ms * -61%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	19234 ms * -96%
Blackview R7	9748 ms * -0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12876 ms * -31%
Leagoo Shark 1	14788 ms * -51%
UMI Super Euro Edition	9410 ms * +4%
Honor 5C	9111 ms * +7%
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * +68%

Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor)
UMI Max	4231 Points
UMI Touch	2562 Points -39%
Coolpad Torino S	2364 Points -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1910 Points -55%
Blackview R7	3885 Points -8%
Acer Liquid Z630S	2855 Points -33%
Leagoo Shark 1	2992 Points -29%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4117 Points -3%
Honor 5C	4188 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points +84%

Leyenda

UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


40.2 °C	38.8 °C	38.2 °C
38.1 °C	38.1 °C	38.3 °C
37.6 °C	37.8 °C	38.2 °C

Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C


33.8 °C	35.6 °C	36.3 °C
33.9 °C	35.3 °C	35.6 °C
33.8 °C	35.4 °C	35.7 °C

Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 35 °C

Conector de corriente 38.7 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	1.02 / 1.53 / 1.62 Watt
Carga	2.91 / 2.93 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	UMI Max 4000 mAh	UMI Touch 4000 mAh	Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh	Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh	Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh	UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh	Honor 5C 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-36%	-19%	6%	-122%	-65%	-96%	-60%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	1.02	0.89 13%	0.68 33%	0.63 38%	1.83 -79%	1.82 -78%	0.59 42%	0.84 18%	0.89 13%
Idle Average *	1.53	2 -31%	2.2 -44%	1.37 10%	3.21 -110%	2.35 -54%	3.22 -110%	1.94 -27%	2.07 -35%
Idle Maximum *	1.62	2.1 -30%	2.26 -40%	1.71 -6%	3.45 -113%	2.6 -60%	3.45 -113%	2.07 -28%	2.15 -33%
Load Average *	2.91	3.87 -33%	3.47 -19%	2.82 3%	5.67 -95%	3.69 -27%	6.93 -138%	5.88 -102%	3.46 -19%
Load Maximum *	2.93	5.79 -98%	3.71 -27%	3.36 -15%	9.16 -213%	5.98 -104%	7.59 -159%	7.67 -162%	5.18 -77%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería


WiFi Websurfing		9h 48min

	UMI Max 4000 mAh	UMI Touch 4000 mAh	Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh	Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh	Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh	UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh	Honor 5C 3000 mAh
Duración de Batería
WiFi v1.3	588	553 -6%	397 -32%	517 -12%	412 -30%	681 16%	542 -8%	638 9%	584 -1%

Pro

+ panel IPS brillante de alto contraste

+ 1080p

+ Unibody de aluminio

+ Smart Key

+ bajo consumo de energía / calor emitido

+ muchísimo aguante de batería

+ LTE Band 20

+ 3 GB de RAM

+ WLAN Dual-Band

+ lector de huellas

+ buen rendimiento y memoria eMMC más rápida (para la categoría de precios)

Contra

- pesado

- defectos de manufactura

- GPS ligeramente impreciso

- fotos borrosas

- tiempo de carga

UMi Max. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Gearbest.com

Nuestros tests muestran que el UMi Max es un buen dispositivo básico con algunos fallos de manufactura. Para su precio podemos aceptar algunas debilidades, tales como un GPS impreciso, un peso relativamente alto, y largos tiempos de carga de la cámara. Los valores de acceso de la memoria eMMC interna y el lector de tarjetas SD son bastante bajos, lo que es típico para un móvil básico.

Por otro lado, el UMi Max puntúa con su brillante panel IPS de alta resolución que ofrece muy buen contraste. Es raro encontrar un display tan bueno a este precio. Además, el rendimiento y la conectividad son buenísimas. El consumo de energía es bajo y el teléfono se puede cargar rápidamente.

Si un display de 5.5" y un peso de 199 gramos no suponen un problema, podemos recomendar el UMi Max como dispositivo básico.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

UMI Max - 2016-11-07 11/07/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Acabado

82%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Ratón

91%

Conectividad

44 / 60 → 74%

Peso

88%

Battería

92%

Pantalla

82%

Rendimiento de juegos

25 / 63 → 39%

Rendimiento de la Aplicación

41 / 70 → 58%

Temperatura

89%

Ruido

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Cámara

58%

Médio

70%

81%

Smartphone - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Max

Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-19 (Update: 2016-11-19)

Size comparison

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

UMI Max audio analysis

Blackview R7 audio analysis

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Price comparison