Breve análisis del Smartphone UleFone Metal
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Ulefone Metal | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
UHANS S1 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
Ulefone Metal | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
Archos 50e Neon |
|
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 312 cd/m²
Contraste: 557:1 (Negro: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.77
Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Archos 50e Neon TFT, 854x480, 5" | Coolpad Porto S IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Wiko Lenny 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | UHANS S1 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | UMI Touch IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -16% | 6% | 15% | -8% | 23% | 18% | 66% | |
Brightness middle | 312 | 443 42% | 407 30% | 374 20% | 525 68% | 508 63% | 424 36% | 554 78% |
Brightness | 315 | 430 37% | 403 28% | 343 9% | 471 50% | 491 56% | 415 32% | 552 75% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 94 8% | 92 6% | 85 -2% | 82 -6% | 89 2% | 91 5% | 96 10% |
Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.38 32% | 0.5 11% | 0.47 16% | 0.92 -64% | 0.58 -4% | 0.54 4% | |
Contrast | 557 | 1166 109% | 814 46% | 796 43% | 571 3% | 876 57% | 785 41% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 13.9 -104% | 7.9 -16% | 6 12% | 8.6 -26% | 7 -3% | 6.9 -1% | 1.59 77% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14 | 29.5 -111% | 18.2 -30% | 11.9 15% | 19.4 -39% | 14.1 -1% | 10.9 22% | 2.56 82% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 17.3 -144% | 8.9 -25% | 6.7 6% | 10.6 -49% | 6.1 14% | 6.8 4% | 2.01 72% |
Gamma | 2.77 79% | 2.93 75% | 2.46 89% | 2.19 100% | 2.34 94% | 2.15 102% | 1.99 111% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 7402 88% | 22878 28% | 8332 78% | 8073 81% | 9487 69% | 8068 81% | 8131 80% | 6321 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | |||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11 ms subida | |
↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
250 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida | |
↘ 231 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 100 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Ulefone Metal | |
Archos 50e Neon | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
UHANS S1 | |
TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
UMI Touch | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Ulefone Metal audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Archos 50e Neon audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
UHANS S1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Coolpad Porto S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.68 / 0.69 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.41 / 2.46 / 2.83 Watt |
Carga |
5.15 / 7.05 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | Archos 50e Neon 2200 mAh | Coolpad Porto S 2000 mAh | Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh | UHANS S1 2200 mAh | TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh | UMI Touch 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 31% | 26% | 22% | 40% | 19% | 25% | 29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.41 | 0.56 60% | 1.16 18% | 0.76 46% | 0.7 50% | 0.72 49% | 0.89 37% | 0.63 55% |
Idle Average * | 2.46 | 1.58 36% | 2.21 10% | 2.16 12% | 1.13 54% | 1.87 24% | 2 19% | 1.1 55% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.83 | 1.8 36% | 2.24 21% | 2.35 17% | 1.25 56% | 2 29% | 2.1 26% | 1.56 45% |
Load Average * | 5.15 | 5.22 -1% | 3.34 35% | 4.65 10% | 4.39 15% | 5.99 -16% | 3.87 25% | 5.95 -16% |
Load Maximum * | 7.05 | 5.34 24% | 3.95 44% | 5.35 24% | 5.43 23% | 6.45 9% | 5.79 18% | 6.7 5% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | Archos 50e Neon 2200 mAh | Coolpad Porto S 2000 mAh | Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh | UHANS S1 2200 mAh | TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh | UMI Touch 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | ||||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 403 | 498 24% | 504 25% | 549 36% | 309 -23% | 453 12% | 553 37% | 732 82% |
Pro
Contra
UleFone ha creado un dispositivo barato pero exitoso. El éxito del modelo de pruebas se puede deber a su precio y sus características técnicas. La manufactura y el rendimiento de sistema también son bastan te buenos para un dispositivo básico.
El mayor defecto del UleFone Metal es la calidad del panel LCD. Este panel IPS es demasiado oscuro y ofrece poco contraste comparado con la competencia. Lo que es más, el consumo de energía es demasiado alto para un dispositivo de 5", lo que resulta en un aguante de batería modesto.
A pesar de las faltas en display y aguante de batería, el UleFone Metal es un dispositivo básico interesante que merece la inversión de unos 100 Euros.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Ulefone Metal
-
09/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich