Breve análisis del Smartphone Wileyfox Spark X
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 96 %
Brillo con batería: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: 815:1 (Negro: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
| Wileyfox Spark X IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | LG X Power K220 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -2% | -9% | 1% | -39% | |
| Brightness middle | 554 | 381 -31% | 414 -25% | 412 -26% | 552 0% |
| Brightness | 542 | 352 -35% | 420 -23% | 414 -24% | 526 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 85 -11% | 94 -2% | 94 -2% | 91 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | 0.2 71% | 0.33 51% | 0.42 38% | 0.64 6% |
| Contrast | 815 | 1905 134% | 1255 54% | 981 20% | 863 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 7.3 -40% | 8.1 -56% | 5.6 -8% | 11 -112% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.7 | 21.2 -98% | 13.8 -29% | 9.7 9% | 20.8 -94% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 7.4 -9% | 9.6 -41% | 6.9 -1% | 14.3 -110% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% | 2 110% | 2.4 92% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7118 91% | 8417 77% | 7754 84% | 8422 77% | 12996 50% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 23 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Wileyfox Spark X | Blackview R7 | Acer Liquid Zest Plus | Lenovo Moto G4 Play | LG X Power K220 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 42% | -7% | 55% | -3% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 194.8 | 247.6 27% | 178.6 -8% | 144.1 -26% | 196.8 1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 37.91 | 122.7 224% | 39.51 4% | 43.95 16% | 43.74 15% |
| Random Read 4KB | 12.26 | 28.02 129% | 20.25 65% | 17.9 46% | 18.78 53% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.57 | 11.4 -27% | 7.95 -49% | 28.31 82% | 7.32 -53% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 39.5 | 15.56 -61% | 27.68 -30% | 65.5 66% | 32.08 -19% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 20.59 | 11.87 -42% | 16.17 -21% | 51.1 148% | 18.17 -12% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Wileyfox Spark X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Blackview R7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG X Power K220 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.06 / 0.16 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.53 / 1.76 / 1.86 Watt |
| Carga |
3.97 / 4.21 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh | LG X Power K220 4100 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 3% | -115% | -16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.53 | 0.64 -21% | 0.68 -28% | 1.83 -245% | 0.83 -57% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.3 26% | 1.58 10% | 3.21 -82% | 2.06 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.86 | 1.34 28% | 1.61 13% | 3.45 -85% | 2.08 -12% |
| Load Average * | 3.97 | 4.18 -5% | 3.36 15% | 5.67 -43% | 3.53 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.21 | 4.87 -16% | 3.91 7% | 9.16 -118% | 4.49 -7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh | LG X Power K220 4100 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 42% | -39% | 11% | 21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1381 | 1998 45% | |||
| H.264 | 777 | 683 -12% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 675 | 987 46% | 412 -39% | 630 -7% | 815 21% |
| Load | 264 | 365 38% | 306 16% |
Pro
Contra
Wileyfox anuncia sobre el Spark X: "La mejor pantalla y la duración de batería hacen de este teléfono el dispositivo multimedia de tus sueños". En general el Spark X tiene algunas buenas características: larga duración de batería, que además es extraible, buena fabricación y una correcta elección de materiales. La pantalla brillante y vívida impresiona y el precio resulta muy tentador.
El Wileyfox Spark X se centra en características concretas: bonito diseño y buena duración de batería en un dispositivo que cuesta menos de 180 euros. Cualquiera que busque un dispisitivo barato debería considerar el Wileyfox Spark X.
Hay muchas cosas que se pueden criticar en un teléfono barato: el modesto rendimiento, la mala respuesta de la pantalla, calidad del altavoz, fotos mediocres (especialmente con poca luz), ausencia de adaptador de corriente, baja resolución (solo 720p) y problemas de robustez. Si puedes aguantar estos defectos, entonces quizás sea un dispositivo adecuado para ti. Si no, la competición en esta categoría es feroz y hay muchas más disponibles.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Wileyfox Spark X
- 11/29/2016 v5.1 (old)
Michael Moser
Price comparison
