Breve análisis del Smartphone ZTE Blade V8 Mini
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 93 %
Brillo con batería: 413 cd/m²
Contraste: 1007:1 (Negro: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini 1280x720, 5" | ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Nokia 5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | Gigaset GS170 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 PLS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 9% | 18% | -21% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 413 | 482 17% | 630 53% | 418 1% | 502 22% |
| Brightness | 403 | 448 11% | 635 58% | 418 4% | 494 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 79 -15% | 90 -3% | 92 -1% | 89 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.64 -56% | 0.57 -39% | 0.45 -10% | 0.35 15% |
| Contrast | 1007 | 753 -25% | 1105 10% | 929 -8% | 1434 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6 | 4 33% | 5 17% | 9.7 -62% | 4.6 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.9 | 6.5 50% | 8.7 33% | 18.9 -47% | 8 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8 | 3.4 57% | 6.9 14% | 11.3 -41% | 2.5 69% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.13 103% | 2.37 93% | 2.27 97% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 7923 82% | 6774 96% | 8736 74% | 10414 62% | 6351 102% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 2273 Hz | ≤ 3 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 2273 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 3 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 2273 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8719 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 51 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Gigaset GS170 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| High Quality (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Chrome 62) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Chrome 62) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini (Chrome 62) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | ZTE Blade V8 | Gigaset GS170 | Nokia 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -20% | 19% | -39% | 1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 262.3 | 177.7 -32% | 278.1 6% | 197.9 -25% | 255.6 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 97.6 | 51 -48% | 77.7 -20% | 44.79 -54% | 74.9 -23% |
| Random Read 4KB | 27.49 | 24 -13% | 39.89 45% | 18.34 -33% | 40.54 47% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.89 | 9.5 -13% | 12.69 17% | 10.45 -4% | 8.39 -23% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.1 ? | 70.3 -16% | 96.5 ? 15% | 37.41 ? -56% | 83.9 0% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.2 ? | 59.6 2% | 87.1 ? 50% | 21.34 ? -63% | 62 7% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
ZTE Blade V8 Mini audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.17 / 0.83 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.21 / 2.26 / 2.27 Watt |
| Carga |
3.89 / 5.96 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini 2800 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Nokia 5 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 25% | 32% | 21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.21 | 0.98 19% | 0.52 57% | 0.54 55% | 0.82 32% |
| Idle Average * | 2.26 | 1.76 22% | 1.78 21% | 1.56 31% | 1.94 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.27 | 1.79 21% | 1.96 14% | 1.6 30% | 2.06 9% |
| Load Average * | 3.89 | 2.89 26% | 3.23 17% | 3.18 18% | 3.31 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.96 | 5.62 6% | 4.88 18% | 4.42 26% | 3.89 35% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| ZTE Blade V8 Mini 2800 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Nokia 5 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 615 | 700 14% | 713 16% | 442 -28% | 722 17% |
Pro
Contra
El ZTE Blade V8 Mini ofrece una cámara dual que funciona razonablemente bien, si bien tiene problemas convirtiendo las instantáneas bokeh. Cuenta con LTE, la opción de usar dos tarjetas SIM, y un fiable lector de huellas. También tiene una batería bastante grande y una resistente carcasa de policarbonato. A apenas 179 Euros (~$215, PVR; aún no disponible en USA), el precio también es atractivo.
Por apenas 179 Euros (~$215, PVR), el ZTE Blade V8 Mini ofrece un buen abanico de características e incluso una cámara dual. Por otro lado, el procesador no es precisamente rápido – como suele ser el caso con dispositivos de este nivel de precios.
Los compradores tendrán que sacrificar rendimiento de procesador, especialmente en lo tocante a las capacidades gaming del dispositivo. El display de 5" por desgracia sólo ofrece resolución HD, y el control automático de brillo a veces lo deja demasiado alto. En cobertura y calidad de llamada, el rendimiento del ZTE Blade V8 Mini quizá sea algo malo en conexiones en interior – fuera no tiene problema alguno.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
ZTE Blade V8 Mini
- 11/08/2017 v6 (old)
Thomas Meyer
Price comparison
