Breve análisis del Smartphone ZTE Blade V8
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 79 %
Brillo con batería: 482 cd/m²
Contraste: 753:1 (Negro: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.13
| ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 6X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 Mini AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -5% | -7% | -47% | -58% | |
| Brightness middle | 482 | 505 5% | 547 13% | 327 -32% | 409 -15% |
| Brightness | 448 | 468 4% | 540 21% | 335 -25% | 411 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 88 11% | 94 19% | 94 19% | 96 22% |
| Black Level * | 0.64 | 0.74 -16% | 0.57 11% | 0.38 41% | |
| Contrast | 753 | 682 -9% | 960 27% | 1076 43% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.1 -3% | 5.1 -28% | 6.3 -58% | 9.4 -135% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 5.8 11% | 9.1 -40% | 11.4 -75% | 17.6 -171% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 4.9 -44% | 6.2 -82% | 7.1 -109% | 11.6 -241% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.5 88% | 2.09 105% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6774 96% | 7116 91% | 6546 99% | 7637 85% | 9597 68% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 5435 Hz | ≤ 1 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 5435 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 1 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 5435 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 47 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Wiko U Feel Prime | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 6X | |
| Huawei P9 Lite | |
| ZTE Axon 7 Mini | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| ZTE Blade V8 | Huawei P9 Lite | Honor 6X | ZTE Axon 7 Mini | ZTE Blade V7 | Wiko U Feel Prime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -22% | 24% | -23% | -47% | -5% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 278.1 | 283.5 2% | 283.4 2% | 230.8 -17% | 196.8 -29% | 270.9 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 77.7 | 46.24 -40% | 73.8 -5% | 122.8 58% | 39.45 -49% | 137.3 77% |
| Random Read 4KB | 39.89 | 38.22 -4% | 39.55 -1% | 14.05 -65% | 28.07 -30% | 55 38% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.69 | 15.35 21% | 45.05 255% | 6.7 -47% | 7.58 -40% | 9.4 -26% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 96.5 | 60.8 -37% | 52 -46% | 73.9 -23% | 43.67 -55% | 41.98 -56% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 87.1 | 25.1 -71% | 34.53 -60% | 50.3 -42% | 20.89 -76% | 35.21 -60% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 19 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
ZTE Blade V8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 6X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.07 / 0.49 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.98 / 1.76 / 1.79 Watt |
| Carga |
2.89 / 5.62 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 Mini 2705 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 7% | 65% | -16% | -26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 964 | 1404 46% | 2250 133% | 1287 34% | |
| H.264 | 545 | 568 4% | 885 62% | 435 -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 700 | 604 -14% | 957 37% | 399 -43% | 519 -26% |
| Load | 297 | 272 -8% | 375 26% | 196 -34% |
Pro
Contra
Al final de este test, surge la duda de para quién es adecuado este dispositivo. Principalmente para los caza chollos que quieren muchas características por poco dinero. Esos compradores se llevan una cámara dual y una cámara frontal de 13-megapixel. Los altavoces disponen de soporte Dolby Audio. Un aguante de batería decente, una buena pantalla, y ampliación de almacenamiento por micro-SD también entran en el paquete.
El Blade V8 es un smartphone que trae buen rendimiento a la gama media por un precio bajo.
¿Y lo malo? Los compradores deberían tener en cuenta que no es un smartphone premium a pesar de la carcasa de aluminio. La configuración presente está en la media, pero no hay nada más. Si se quiere más potencia y una mejor configuración hay que ir a por un modelo más caro. Los mediocres valores de rendimiento en la comparación de rendimiento son la mayor crítica. Por desgracia, los altavoces son muy endebles sin Dolby Audio, y esto resulta en una falta de volumen. La cámara presenta debilidades visibles a poca luz.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
ZTE Blade V8
- 03/29/2017 v6 (old)
Niklas Böhm
Price comparison
