Breve análisis del Tablet Chuwi Hi10 Pro
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 379 cd/m²
Contraste: 902:1 (Negro: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.23
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Medion Lifetab P10505 IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Haier Pad 971 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 14% | 22% | -23% | 4% | 2% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 379 | 425 12% | 435 15% | 320 -16% | 370 -2% | 392 3% | 294 -22% |
| Brightness | 356 | 402 13% | 425 19% | 308 -13% | 351 -1% | 385 8% | 294 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 92 6% | 84 -3% | 89 2% | 91 5% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.4 5% | 0.34 19% | 0.36 14% | 0.4 5% | 0.59 -40% | 0.37 12% |
| Contrast | 902 | 1063 18% | 1279 42% | 889 -1% | 925 3% | 664 -26% | 795 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 4.98 -4% | 4.1 15% | 7.5 -56% | 4.6 4% | 4.5 6% | 3.2 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.2 | 6.61 41% | 8.5 24% | 16.1 -44% | 9.5 15% | 7.8 30% | 6.5 42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 5.2 22% | 4.4 34% | 10.8 -61% | 6.5 3% | 4.8 28% | 3 55% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.65 83% | 2.11 104% | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.47 89% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6988 93% | 7249 90% | 7414 88% | 9907 66% | 6354 102% | 7426 88% | 6882 94% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 83 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 39 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 44 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Haier Pad 971 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742 | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Chuwi Hi10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.2 / 0.69 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.4 / 4.82 / 5.43 Watt |
| Carga |
11.61 / 12.48 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro 6500 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L 7000 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10505 7000 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | 11% | 3% | 41% | 20% | 48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 3.33 -138% | 1.7 -21% | 2.01 -44% | 1.22 13% | 1.58 -13% | 1.38 1% |
| Idle Average * | 4.82 | 5.01 -4% | 4.4 9% | 4.82 -0% | 3.15 35% | 4.12 15% | 1.46 70% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.43 | 5.19 4% | 4.7 13% | 4.89 10% | 3.39 38% | 4.15 24% | 1.6 71% |
| Load Average * | 11.61 | 8.32 28% | 8.4 28% | 8.35 28% | 3.95 66% | 6.2 47% | 5.06 56% |
| Load Maximum * | 12.48 | 9.33 25% | 9.2 26% | 9.91 21% | 5.64 55% | 9.27 26% | 6.95 44% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro 6500 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L 7000 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10505 7000 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro 6600 mAh | Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 364 | 421 16% | 601 65% | 564 55% | 435 20% | 416 14% | 423 16% |
Pro
Contra
El asequible tablet de Chuwi impresiona con su diseño atractivo y chasis de aluminio de primera. Además, el Hi10 Pro tiene un display LC IPS con buena estabilidad de ángulo de visión, contraste y colores, y tiene una decente cantidad de puertos físicos. No deberíamos olvidar los interesantes y asequibles accesorios (stylus y teclado anclable), aunque no pudimos testear ninguno de ellos.
El Chuwi Hi10 Pro es una alternativa interesante en el segmento tablet de 10" para los usuarios que no sepan decidir cuál SO prefieren y que querrían la capacidad de intercambiar entre ellos.
La opción de arranque doble con Android y Windows funcionó impecablemente durante nuestro test y ciertamente es uno de los motivos - si no el principal - para plantearse este tablet. Por desgracia, el fabricante chino ofrece Android 5.1 Lollipop, que es una versión no actual del SO.
El rendimiento del Intel Atom x5-Z8300 combinado con los 4 GB de RAM es suficiente para sendos sistemas operativos, aunque el usuario no debería esperar un rendimiento equivalente al de un PC Windows completo. Para navegar y procesar textos bajo Windows 10, el rendimiento es bastante decente. Visto de lo que el SoC Intel debería ser capaz en teoría, esperaríamos un mejor rendimiento de sistema - especialmente cuando el tablet va en Android. No quedamos impresionados por el lento almacenamiento flash eMMC y las tasas de transferencia inalámbricas bajo par tampoco. Para un tablet de 10", el consumo de energía también es demasiado elevado y el aguante de batería está en la media.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Chuwi Hi10 Pro
- 11/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
