Breve análisis del Tablet Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 1279:1 (Negro: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.11
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | LG G Pad II 10.1 AH-IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -16% | -12% | -10% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 435 | 385 -11% | 389 -11% | 542 25% | 355 -18% |
| Brightness | 425 | 383 -10% | 357 -16% | 520 22% | 367 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 71 -23% | 91 -1% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.41 -21% | 0.41 -21% | 0.68 -100% | 0.53 -56% |
| Contrast | 1279 | 939 -27% | 949 -26% | 797 -38% | 670 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 5.31 -30% | 4.64 -13% | 4.2 -2% | 3.2 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.5 | 8.57 -1% | 11.97 -41% | 6.7 21% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 5.58 -27% | 1.96 55% | 4.8 -9% | 4.36 1% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.4 92% | 2.43 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7414 88% | 7044 92% | 6414 101% | 7434 87% | 7240 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 15 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 59 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 58 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 18 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.7 / 4.4 / 4.7 Watt |
| Carga |
8.4 / 9.2 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 6660 mAh | HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | LG G Pad II 10.1 7400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -42% | 16% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 3.5 -106% | 1.18 31% | 3.6 -112% |
| Idle Average * | 4.4 | 4.13 6% | 5.5 -25% | 4.65 -6% | 6.2 -41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.7 | 4.22 10% | 5.7 -21% | 4.74 -1% | 6.3 -34% |
| Load Average * | 8.4 | 6.57 22% | 10.7 -27% | 5.75 32% | 10 -19% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.2 | 8.32 10% | 12.2 -33% | 6.97 24% | 11.4 -24% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch 6660 mAh | HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | LG G Pad II 10.1 7400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 3% | -23% | 77% | 47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 975 | 988 1% | 2634 170% | 1676 72% | |
| H.264 | 587 | 602 3% | 893 52% | 1020 74% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 601 | 698 16% | 464 -23% | 826 37% | 782 30% |
| Load | 291 | 266 -9% | 428 47% | 325 12% |
Pro
Contra
El Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business tiene algunas ventajas importantes: la pantalla es genial y ofrece varias opciones. Las temperaturas son muy buenas y la WLAN o Internet móvil es fiable. Sobre todo: el tablet cuesta300 Euros.
Hay una gran desventaja: el rendimiento del tablet es muy inferior al de los dispositivos de comparación. Es difícil jugar en este dispositivo, y hasta navegar puede ser lento.
Afortunadamente, Lenovo no incluye apps spam, pero ofrece cámaras decentes y un GPS fiable. El dispositivo incluso está certificado frente al polvo y a las gotas de agua. Por supuesto, no es un tablet para el mundo de la construcción, pero al menos ofrece cierta protección. Si buscas un dispositivo así, recomendamos el Tablet de Panasonic o el HP Pro Tablet 10.
El Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business es un buen tablet barato de oficina. Rendimiento no mucho, pero la mayoría de características sí están presentes.
Su aspecto conservador es su punto mas fuerte. Los usuarios domésticos a los que les guste navegar y jugar querrán echar un vistazo al Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Tab 3 10 Business TB3-X70L
- 10/20/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
