Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del convertible Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA (i5, 256 GB, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: 1336:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.68
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 AUO B133HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 LP125WF4-SPH1, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 17% | 7% | 6% | 2% | -31% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 77.3 21% | 67.6 6% | 67.2 5% | 65.2 2% | 42.79 -33% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90 | 92.8 3% | 99 10% | 97.5 8% | 91 1% | 64.3 -29% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.9 | 83.1 28% | 69.1 6% | 69.1 6% | 66.1 2% | 44.21 -32% |
| Response Times | 61% | 3% | 5% | 8% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 4 ? 91% | 42 ? 5% | 44 ? -0% | 45 ? -2% | 42 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 20 ? 31% | 29 ? -0% | 26 ? 10% | 24 ? 17% | 31 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21000 | 531 ? | |||
| Screen | 100% | 11% | -18% | -13% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 334 | 376 13% | 417 25% | 303 -9% | 406 22% | 336 1% |
| Brightness | 321 | 378 18% | 401 25% | 272 -15% | 396 23% | 320 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 88 2% | 79 -8% | 88 2% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.03 88% | 0.29 -16% | 0.46 -84% | 0.3 -20% | 0.34 -36% |
| Contrast | 1336 | 12533 838% | 1438 8% | 659 -51% | 1353 1% | 988 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 4.1 3% | 3.63 14% | 3.94 7% | 5.28 -25% | 3.45 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.03 | 6.45 -7% | 6.74 -12% | 6.57 -9% | 9.83 -63% | 7.95 -32% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 3.64 7% | 2.18 44% | 5.14 -31% | 6.71 -71% | 1.68 57% |
| Gamma | 2.68 82% | 2.58 85% | 3.09 71% | 2.31 95% | 2.29 96% | 2.49 88% |
| CCT | 6758 96% | 7113 91% | 6767 96% | 6521 100% | 6532 100% | 6782 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 74 28% | 63 9% | 63 9% | 59 2% | 41 -29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 93 3% | 99 10% | 98 9% | 91 1% | 64 -29% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 59% /
78% | 7% /
9% | -2% /
-10% | -1% /
-7% | -13% /
-11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 11 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 44 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 71 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 10 | |
| Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3521 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4364 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4559 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3125 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 60% | 25% | 227% | -18% | |
| Read Seq | 455.9 | 511 12% | 723 59% | 513 13% | 2408 428% | 423.7 -7% |
| Write Seq | 432.5 | 473.7 10% | 853 97% | 467.7 8% | 1702 294% | 406.4 -6% |
| Read 512 | 315.7 | 443.7 41% | 225 -29% | 379.8 20% | 1301 312% | 260.8 -17% |
| Write 512 | 291.5 | 395.4 36% | 445 53% | 399.1 37% | 1288 342% | 255.6 -12% |
| Read 4k | 29.7 | 40.46 36% | 46 55% | 38.74 30% | 53.6 80% | 22.73 -23% |
| Write 4k | 57 | 91.9 61% | 125 119% | 89.8 58% | 162.2 185% | 27.92 -51% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 385.4 | 289.1 -25% | 423 10% | 337.1 -13% | 504 31% | 306.2 -21% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 170.8 | 260.7 53% | 373 118% | 254.2 49% | 420.8 146% | 158.8 -7% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1743 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 66764 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6475 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 963 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 435 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 380 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 57.7 | 31.4 | 26.3 | 8.15 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 41.2 | 27.9 | 18.4 | 6.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.8 | 12.3 | 7.1 | 4.6 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 34.2 / 32.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 5289 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 4% | -5% | -2% | ||
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 30.3 1% | 30 2% | 30.4 -0% | 30.5 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 30.4 -0% | 30.5 -0% | ||
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 30.3 1% | 30 2% | 32.4 -6% | 30.5 -0% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 32.4 -6% | 30.5 -0% | ||
| Load Average * | 34.2 | 31.7 7% | 30.8 10% | 36 -5% | 36 -5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 32.5 | 31.7 2% | 30.8 5% | 36.3 -12% | 34.6 -6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.4 °C / -4.3 F).
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 5289 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -35% | -23% | -2% | -27% | -19% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.5 | 52.5 -33% | 39.2 1% | 42.2 -7% | 42 -6% | 49 -24% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 41.5 | 56.3 -36% | 40.3 3% | 43.1 -4% | 43.6 -5% | 44.4 -7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.1 | 31.4 -36% | 37 -60% | 22.5 3% | 32.8 -42% | 28.6 -24% |
| Idle Bottom * | 23.6 | 32.2 -36% | 32.3 -37% | 23.3 1% | 36.4 -54% | 28.3 -20% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.68 / 2.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.6 / 5.3 / 8.5 Watt |
| Carga |
29 / 27 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | -14% | -10% | -16% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.9 -50% | 3.6 -38% | 3.9 -50% | 3.5 -35% | 2.7 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 5.3 | 9 -70% | 8.1 -53% | 6.6 -25% | 7.2 -36% | 5.1 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.5 | 11.9 -40% | 8.7 -2% | 6.9 19% | 7.9 7% | 7.6 11% |
| Load Average * | 29 | 27.3 6% | 25.5 12% | 27 7% | 29.6 -2% | 33 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 27 | 27.9 -3% | 23.5 13% | 27.1 -0% | 30.8 -14% | 29 -7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 4% | 27% | -5% | -26% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 937 | 1031 10% | 1054 12% | 941 0% | 713 -24% | 1728 84% |
| H.264 | 421 | 409 -3% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 483 | 744 54% | 353 -27% | 345 -29% | 708 47% | |
| Load | 147 | 168 14% | 164 12% | 111 -24% | 136 -7% |
Pro
Contra
El Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA es un convertible inteligente que puede marcarse varios puntos con su selección de material de alta calidad. Dentro, sin embargo, no hay mucha novedad. El Intel Core i5-7200U ya es bastante viejo y la próxima generación está al caer. No obstante, el Kaby-Lake SoC puede manejar nuestras pruebas bastante bien, aunque el objetivo de mantener la temperatura limita bastante el rendimiento del procesador. En los Estados Unidos, el Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA está disponible por $ 1400 en la configuración con 16 GB de RAM, procesador Intel i7, y un SSD de 512 GB. Por este precio, los compradores consiguen un convertible perfectamente construido, que es realmente precioso en su combinación de colores azul y oro.
El Asus ZenBook Flip S UX 370UA tiene una construcción perfecta y es un buen compañero de viaje gracias a su poco peso. Los escritores prolificos estarán contentos cuando escuchen de su buen teclado.
Una desventaja, sin embargo, es el pequeño sistema de refrigeración, que hace que el procesador pierda el 14% de su posible rendimiento bajo carga constante. También es una pena que el dispositivo no esté equipado con una ranura de tarjeta de memoria, que sería una gran alternativa para la transferencia de datos y también funcionan como expansión de almacenamiento. La pantalla nos dio señales ambiguas. La superficie reflectante puede ser molesta en un entorno luminoso, pero por otro lado, la buena cobertura de espacio de color hace que sea utilizable para procesar imágenes de manera semi-profesional. Con todo, podemos decir que el Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370UA puede mantenerse al día con su competencia en la configuración probada. Pero como siempre, usted tendrá que decidir por sí mismo qué dispositivo es mejor para usted.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
- 10/03/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade