Breve análisis del convertible Dell XPS 13 9365 (7Y54, QHD+)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
|
iluminación: 78 %
Brillo con batería: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1740:1 (Negro: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.47 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -25% | 7% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 47.32 -27% | 69.4 8% | 62.2 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.9 | 71.1 -23% | 96.8 4% | 90.1 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.1 | 48.83 -26% | 71.1 8% | 63.5 -4% |
Response Times | -9% | -1% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 48 ? -0% | 42 ? 12% | 46 ? 4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 32.8 ? -17% | 32 ? -14% | 24 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | 1042 ? | |||
Screen | -44% | -1% | -51% | |
Brightness middle | 348 | 322.6 -7% | 302.6 -13% | 348 0% |
Brightness | 306 | 306 0% | 282 -8% | 310 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 78 | 91 17% | 83 6% | 80 3% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.19 5% | 0.25 -25% | 0.25 -25% |
Contrast | 1740 | 1698 -2% | 1210 -30% | 1392 -20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.79 | 7.7 -176% | 2.4 14% | 7.86 -182% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.53 | 11.1 -101% | 4.9 11% | 13.43 -143% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.47 | 7.9 -128% | 2.8 19% | 8.25 -138% |
Gamma | 2.54 87% | 2.88 76% | 2.2 100% | 2.05 107% |
CCT | 6564 99% | 7044 92% | 6333 103% | 6834 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 44.1 -26% | 65.5 9% | 58 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 69.9 -25% | 97.1 4% | 90 -3% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -26% /
-36% | 2% /
0% | -15% /
-33% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida | |
↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
48 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 26 ms subida | |
↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 81 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2706 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 31% | 114% | 58% | |
Read Seq | 1159 | 1206 4% | 2065 78% | 1412 22% |
Write Seq | 324.1 | 629 94% | 1550 378% | 578 78% |
Read 512 | 528 | 966 83% | 865 64% | 701 33% |
Write 512 | 373.7 | 410.7 10% | 1229 229% | 580 55% |
Read 4k | 29.26 | 32.93 13% | 54.7 87% | 43.5 49% |
Write 4k | 108.3 | 121.2 12% | 139.4 29% | 159.7 47% |
Read 4k QD32 | 335.9 | 411 22% | 518 54% | 570 70% |
Write 4k QD32 | 234.1 | 250.2 7% | 225.6 -4% | 488.7 109% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1272 puntos | |
ayuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diablo III (2012) | 55.8 | 36.3 | 30.1 | 17.8 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 99.9 | 57.3 | 39.5 | 21.9 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 31.4 | 20.4 | 19.3 | 6.1 |
GRID: Autosport (2014) | 74.9 | 24.6 | ||
F1 2014 (2014) | 55 | 34 | ||
GTA V (2015) | 19.9 | 16.7 | ||
World of Warships (2015) | 49.9 | 30.2 | ||
Anno 2205 (2015) | 15.9 | 10.2 | ||
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 24.6 | 16.2 | ||
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 12 | 5 | ||
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 15.5 | 9 | ||
Civilization VI (2016) | 20.6 | 9.2 | ||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 70.2 | 45.1 | ||
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 19.9 | 15.9 | ||
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 22.2 | 9.5 | ||
For Honor (2017) | 16.8 | 6.2 | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 9.8 | 4 | ||
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 11.6 | 4 | ||
Prey (2017) | 14.3 | 6.6 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.3 °C / 2.4 F).
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 1.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 8.2 / 10.8 / 12.7 Watt |
Carga |
22.6 / 24.6 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
Pro
Contra
El Dell XPS 13 que estamos probando tiene un procesador Core i5-7Y54. No es de ninguna manera inferior al nominalmente superior Core i7 incluido en su modelo gemelo probado con anterioridad. Como ambas CPUs apenas alcanzan la máxima velocidad posible debido a la refrigeración pasiva, los resultados en los tests de CPU son bastante similares. Apenas puede apreciarse una ligera ventaja en el modelo con Core i7 en las tareas cotidianas. El coste extra del procesador Core i7 no merece realmente la pena.
Al no haber ventilador, el dispositivo se mantiene silencioso. Además no se calienta demasiado. Un SSD NVMe asegura un sistema rápido. Cambiar el SSD debería ser posible. Para hacerlo necesitarías extraer la parte inferior de la carcasa. El teclado nos ha dejado una impresión positiva.
La pantalla IPS tiene buenos ángulos de visualización y ofrece muy buen contraste. El brillo es también muy bueno, a pesar de que podría ser mayor y que el dispositivo está pensado para ser usado bajo condiciones de luz muy variadas.
La pantalla QHD+ super nítida tiene un efecto negativo en la duración de batería.
En nuestro test WLAN la duración de batería descendió alrededor de 5 horas en comparación con el modelo Full HD del XPS 13. Los usuarios que necesiten una duración de batería lo más extensa posible deberían elegir el modelo Full HD.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
- 05/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck