Breve análisis del convertible HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (i7-8550U, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 338.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1210:1 (Negro: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 LG Philips (Dell 156WF7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng LG Philips, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 AU Optronics B139HAN03.0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx LG Philips LGD054D, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -32% | 2% | -36% | 0% | 9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 41.74 -37% | 65 -2% | 39.45 -41% | 62.5 -6% | 69.4 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 62.8 -28% | 90.8 4% | 59.2 -32% | 91.7 6% | 96.8 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 43.13 -32% | 65.8 4% | 40.76 -36% | 64.1 1% | 71.1 12% |
| Response Times | -1% | 830% | -39% | -10% | -5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.2 ? | 55 ? -33% | 29.6 ? 28% | 55 ? -33% | 46 ? -12% | 42 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 20 ? 32% | 26.4 ? 11% | 26 ? 12% | 31.6 ? -7% | 32 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 | 25510 ? 2451% | 50 ? -95% | |||
| Screen | -10% | -5% | -34% | -18% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 338.7 | 244 -28% | 300.9 -11% | 205 -39% | 297.9 -12% | 302.6 -11% |
| Brightness | 325 | 242 -26% | 285 -12% | 191 -41% | 278 -14% | 282 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 92 1% | 74 -19% | 81 -11% | 83 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.25 11% | 0.24 14% | 0.3 -7% | 0.44 -57% | 0.25 11% |
| Contrast | 1210 | 976 -19% | 1254 4% | 683 -44% | 677 -44% | 1210 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 4.94 -1% | 5 -2% | 7.2 -47% | 5.1 -4% | 2.4 51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.7 | 7.3 16% | 10.2 -17% | 12.7 -46% | 11 -26% | 4.9 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4.93 10% | 7 -27% | 6.86 -25% | 6.7 -22% | 2.8 49% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.7 81% | 2.34 94% | 2.27 97% | 2.9 76% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7498 87% | 7401 88% | 6578 99% | 6983 93% | 6839 95% | 6333 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.5 | 40 -37% | 59 -7% | 38 -40% | 64.1 1% | 65.5 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.92 | 63 -28% | 90 4% | 59 -32% | 91.7 5% | 97.1 12% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -14% /
-13% | 276% /
153% | -36% /
-35% | -9% /
-13% | 6% /
10% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 77 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 41.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 23.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 63 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 1000 Hz |  | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 1000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) . La frecuencia de 1000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3457 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5083 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4217 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3673 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -96% | -1505% | -27% | -649% | -20% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1134 | 150 -87% | 319.2 -72% | 727 -36% | 1123 -1% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 534 | 77.3 -86% | 463.3 -13% | 475.1 -11% | 466.7 -13% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1936 | 325.7 -83% | 1341 -31% | 1126 -42% | 1672 -14% | |
| Score Total | 3781 | 920 -76% | 942 -75% | 2536 -33% | 426 -89% | 2219 -41% |
| Score Write | 1556 | 241 -85% | 48 -97% | 608 -61% | 20 -99% | 832 -47% |
| Score Read | 1493 | 443 -70% | 646 -57% | 1316 -12% | 307 -79% | 945 -37% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.026 | 0.083 -219% | 4.15 -15862% | 0.028 -8% | 2.179 -8281% | 0.031 -19% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.128 -220% | 0.08 -100% | 0.044 -10% | 0.044 -10% | 0.036 10% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1262 | 144.6 -89% | 15.3 -99% | 391.3 -69% | 2.08 -100% | 566 -55% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1206 | 371.1 -69% | 371.6 -69% | 1039 -14% | 113.7 -91% | 641 -47% |
| 4K Write | 141.1 | 50.4 -64% | 1.2 -99% | 128.1 -9% | 1.91 -99% | 118.5 -16% |
| 4K Read | 51.9 | 27.09 -48% | 47.1 -9% | 48.46 -7% | 35 -33% | 48.18 -7% |
| Seq Write | 1530 | 460.3 -70% | 311.7 -80% | 885 -42% | 160.4 -90% | 1476 -4% |
| Seq Read | 2342 | 451 -81% | 2277 -3% | 2282 -3% | 1599 -32% | 2556 9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4825 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13664 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3217 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (ordenar por valor) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 201 | 112.9 | 94.3 | 34.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68.3 | 39.5 | 22.8 | 12.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 72.3 | 40.8 | 23.1 | 17.6 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 41.6 / 41.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -0% | 5% | -6% | -3% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 30.6 -8% | 28.2 1% | 28 1% | 28.5 -0% | 28.7 -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.2 1% | 28 1% | 28.5 -0% | 31.7 -12% | 28.7 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.2 1% | 28.8 -1% | 28.5 -0% | 31.7 -12% | 34.2 -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.2 1% | 30.3 -7% | 36.3 -28% | 31.7 -12% | 35.8 -26% |
| Load Average * | 41.6 | 32.3 22% | 39 6% | 34.5 17% | 42.7 -3% | 38.8 7% | 35.8 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.1 | ||||||
| Load Maximum * | 41.6 | 35.2 15% | 46.3 -11% | 34.3 18% | 42.7 -3% | 36.8 12% | 39.6 5% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.4 °C / -9.8 F).
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.49 / 0.78 Watt |
| Ocioso | 11.6 / 13.8 / 14.2 Watt |
| Carga |
67.9 / 76.9 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 51% | -6% | 20% | 44% | 56% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11.6 | 4.3 63% | 8.3 28% | 8.14 30% | 5.9 49% | 3.1 73% |
| Idle Average * | 13.8 | 7.6 45% | 10.2 26% | 10.91 21% | 9.2 33% | 6.6 52% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.2 | 9.8 31% | 10.4 27% | 12.26 14% | 9.3 35% | 7 51% |
| Load Average * | 67.9 | 32.6 52% | 67.5 1% | 45.67 33% | 35.6 48% | 35.2 48% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 59 | 96.5 -64% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 76.9 | 28.4 63% | 117.2 -52% | 74.94 3% | 32.9 57% | 34.6 55% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -23% | -7% | 38% | 2% | -32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 934 | 1066 14% | 1655 77% | 866 -7% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 511 | 394 -23% | 484 -5% | 685 34% | 535 5% | 348 -32% |
| Load | 136 | 96 -29% | 140 3% | 148 9% |
Pro
Contra
El Specter x360 15 de 15.6" es un excelente 2-en-1 con suficiente capacidad de procesamiento para manejar incluso las aplicaciones más exigentes. HP dejó intacta la carcasa, pero actualizó el hardware con una CPU Kaby Lake-R más potente y una nueva gráficá básica GeForce. Las grandes noticias son, por supuesto, las mejoras en el rendimiento de CPU y GPU, y aquí el nuevo Spectre supera al predecesor por un amplio margen, al menos cuando la aplicación puede aprovechar los dos núcleos adicionales. Como tal, el convertible con su vívida pantalla 4K, 16 GB de RAM y un SSD PCIe PCIe aún más rápida de 512 GB podría ser muy atractiva para los usuarios que buscan una máquina de productividad que también pueda cumplir con los deberes de los juegos ligeros.
El tiempo de aguante de la batería ha sufrido un poco, pero con un uso juicioso, el Spectre aún durará todo un día de trabajo. De lo contrario, los pros y los contras de nuestro análisis anterior aún se aplican: las bisagras no son lo suficientemente rígidas como para sostener la pantalla de forma segura en todas las posiciones, el panel 4K puede ser excesivo para algunos, especialmente a la luz de los problemas ocasionales de escalado, y un convertible de 15.6" es bastante grande y pesado, lo que podría limitar su utilidad en modo tableta.
Después de la actualización solo de hardware, el HP Spectre x360 15t sigue siendo un sólido 2 en 1 y se mantiene como una de las mejores opciones cuando se considera un convertible grande.
Los usuarios que no requieran la GPU dedicada y prefieran un mayor aguante de la batería en su lugar también deberían echar un vistazo al Lenovo Yoga 920, que es un poco más pequeño.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner
Price comparison
