Breve análisis del convertible Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 449 cd/m²
Contraste: 1403:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1" | Google Pixel C LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.2" | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Triluminos display with X-Reality, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE IPS , 1920x1080, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -12% | 23% | -41% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 449 | 487 8% | 523 16% | 471 5% | 382 -15% |
| Brightness | 421 | 510 21% | 500 19% | 457 9% | 363 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 93 8% | 92 7% | 83 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.39 -22% | 0.52 -63% | 0.46 -44% | 0.37 -16% |
| Contrast | 1403 | 1249 -11% | 1006 -28% | 1024 -27% | 1032 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.24 -11% | 1.1 77% | 8.69 -85% | 3.61 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.1 | 1.9 83% | 7.92 29% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 7.95 -77% | 1.4 69% | 11.24 -150% | 3.77 16% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.11 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 7122 91% | 6565 99% | 6662 98% | 9508 68% | 6760 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.97 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.55 | 99 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 54 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 28 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 26 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 90 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Random Read 4KB | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Random Write 4KB | |
| Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Google Pixel C | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.12 / 0.12 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.19 / 4.3 / 4.37 Watt |
| Carga |
8.62 / 11.26 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F 8500 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet mAh | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 8500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -26% | -13% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 2.19 | 1.82 17% | 1.71 22% | 2 9% | |
| Idle Average * | 4.3 | 4.26 1% | 7.55 -76% | 4.6 -7% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.37 | 4.33 1% | 7.62 -74% | 5.7 -30% | |
| Load Average * | 8.62 | 9.82 -14% | 8.39 3% | 11.5 -33% | |
| Load Maximum * | 11.26 | 13.99 -24% | 12.08 -7% | 11.5 -2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F 8500 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet mAh | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 8500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 12% | 2% | -8% | -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1985 | 2090 5% | 1850 -7% | 2135 8% | 1153 -42% |
| H.264 | 702 | 740 5% | 708 1% | 705 0% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 602 | 638 6% | 779 29% | 525 -13% | 498 -17% |
| Load | 222 | 294 32% | 186 -16% | 166 -25% |
Pro
Contra
El Yoga Book ocupa un lugar especial en nuestro corazón y funciona bien incluso con Android. De hecho, en algunos aspectos puede batir incluso a algunos tablets con Windows. El diseño es único y es un placer observar el funcionamiento de las características bisagras. El teclado Halo retroiluminado tiene muy buen aspecto y funciona muy bien en su uso cotidiano, pero recomendamos evitar las zonas soleadas, si no tendrás que buscar un teclado físico.
El Yoga Book hace un buen trabajo digitalizando notas. Es un gran plus para profesionales que toman muchas notas sobre la marcha y quieren una tablet y una tableta digitalizadora a la vez. El iPad Pro 9.7 no puede igualarle en este aspecto. Al modelo de prueba le costó alguna vez reconocer el contenido o ejecutar alguna acción. Los usuarios profesionales deberían tomarse un tiempo para probar el dispositivo (especialmente la tableta gráfica) antes de comprarlo.
El rendimiento y la pantalla son decentes, pero no extraordinarios. Resultan suficientes para las tareas cotidianas. La pantalla no tiene fidelidad de color suficiente para su uso profesional. Afortunadamente, el dispositivo apenas se calienta y siempre rinde al máximo. Los buenos altavoces, la robusta carcasa y los dispositivos de entrada muy versátiles completan el Lenovo Yoga Book Android.
Nos gustó la buena duración de la batería. La barra de navegación de Android se ha personalizado con el fin de ser funcional y fácil de usar.
Practico, funcional, flexible y sin grandes puntos flacos: el Yoga Book con Android es sin duda un dispositivo para sectores muy específicos, pero es muy divertido trabajar con él.
Si no necesitas Windows 10, te recomendamos echar un ojo a la versión Android, ya que puede resultar más conveniente que el dispositivo con Windows en ciertos aspectos como la batería y la pantalla.
En resumen, Lenovo ofrece una herramienta única para diseñadores gráficos que quieren una tablet portátil. El Yoga Book también destaca en diseño y apariencia gracias a su fabulosa carcasa y bisagras características. El dispositivo ofrece todo esto sin grandes puntos flacos. Recomendamos a los potenciales compradores de tablets echar un ojo al Yoga Book Android.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
- 11/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
