Breve análisis del portátil Acer Aspire 3 A315-21 (A6-9220, Radeon R4)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 15-ba077ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 15-ba077ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 223 cd/m²
Contraste: 474:1 (Negro: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.81% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.48% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP 15-ba077ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 3% | -8% | -10% | 1% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.48 | 38.91 -1% | 40.6 3% | 36.51 -8% | 35.43 -10% | 39.98 1% | 35.97 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.2 | 58.6 -1% | 61.2 3% | 55 -7% | 53.3 -10% | 60.2 2% | 54.1 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.81 | 40.2 -1% | 41.95 3% | 37.72 -8% | 36.6 -10% | 41.31 1% | 37.17 -9% |
| Response Times | -9% | -53% | 9% | -10% | -29% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 39 ? 19% | 68 ? -42% | 40 ? 17% | 42.4 ? 12% | 42 ? 12% | 44 ? 8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 19 ? 14% | 26 ? -18% | 22 ? -0% | 28.8 ? -31% | 22 ? -0% | 12 ? 45% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 10000 ? -60% | 217 ? -99% | 50 ? -100% | |||
| Screen | -2% | -1% | -4% | -19% | -10% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 223 | 243 9% | 226 1% | 219 -2% | 199.8 -10% | 209 -6% | 241 8% |
| Brightness | 220 | 233 6% | 217 -1% | 222 1% | 199 -10% | 200 -9% | 229 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 75 -15% | 91 3% | 85 -3% | 85 -3% | 88 0% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.45 4% | 0.58 -23% | 0.39 17% | 0.712 -51% | 0.56 -19% | 0.46 2% |
| Contrast | 474 | 540 14% | 390 -18% | 562 19% | 281 -41% | 373 -21% | 524 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.72 | 11.69 -9% | 9.84 8% | 12.67 -18% | 13.24 -24% | 12.21 -14% | 3.4 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.7 | 20.08 -13% | 16.77 5% | 20.99 -19% | 21.52 -22% | 20.66 -17% | 7.61 57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.81 | 13.12 -11% | 11.1 6% | 13.82 -17% | 13.33 -13% | 13.48 -14% | 1.7 86% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.24 98% | 2.35 94% | 2.63 84% | 1.69 130% | 2.34 94% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 13530 48% | 16905 38% | 11979 54% | 15633 42% | 15879 41% | 15364 42% | 6750 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37 -3% | 39 3% | 35 -8% | 33.8 -11% | 38 0% | 34 -11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 59 0% | 61 3% | 55 -7% | 53.4 -9% | 60 2% | 54 -8% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -4% /
-3% | -17% /
-10% | -1% /
-3% | -13% /
-16% | -13% /
-11% | 13% /
16% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 25000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 20 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 25000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 44 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 48 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 26 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 81 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
| HP 350 G1 F7Z01EA | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
| HP 350 G1 F7Z01EA | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 3558 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2337 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2320 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3483 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 1821 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| HP 15-ba077ng | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y | |
| HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 3886 puntos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 2542 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 984 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 30989 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2458 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 545 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 273 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 215 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 47.7 | 21.9 | ||
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 25.7 | 16.5 | 11.3 | |
| Anno 2070 (2011) | 53.8 | 23.7 | 15.5 | |
| Diablo III (2012) | 44.8 | 31.9 | 27.7 | |
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 29.7 | 21.9 | 17.8 | |
| Dead Space 3 (2013) | 45.5 | 22.9 | 19.5 | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 39.4 | 19.9 | 13.2 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 34.6 | 20.8 | 17 | |
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 57 | 24.5 | ||
| Sims 4 (2014) | 90 | 28.8 | ||
| F1 2014 (2014) | 30 | 26 | ||
| Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 15.1 | 10.9 | ||
| Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 15.1 | 12 | ||
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 48.8 | 16.2 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 26 | 17.9 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 32.4 | 20.3 | ||
| World of Warships (2015) | 30 | 22.1 | ||
| Overwatch (2016) | 20.7 | 16.9 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 38 | 24.8 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 31.3 | |||
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 23 | 22.6 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 15 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 31.9 / 31.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.6 °C / 6.5 F).
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.36 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.6 / 7.3 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
20 / 21.6 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
El Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y es un portátil de oficina simple de 15.6" para usar en casa. La APU tiene suficiente potencia de rendimiento para manejar aplicaciones relacionadas con la oficina e Internet. El portátil apenas se recalienta. También podría funcionar silenciosamente bajo cada nivel de carga, pero el insatisfactorio control del ventilador lo arruina todo.
El Aspire 3 A315-21 es un portátil de oficina simple que puede manejar fácilmente las tareas cotidianas.
El SSD permite que el sistema funcione rápidamente. No hay escasez de espacio de almacenamiento, dado que el SSD viene acompañado de un disco duro de 1 TB y 2,5". El teclado es razonablemente bueno y cumple todos los requisitos para el uso doméstico. La pantalla mate de 15.6" no ganará ningún premio. Es oscura, tiene poco contraste y no proporciona ángulos de visión estables.
En nuestra opinión, el precio de Aspire es su mayor problema. A partir de la fecha de publicación de este análisis, el dispositivo aparece a la venta por poco menos de 500 euros en varios motores de búsqueda de precios. Algunos de los modelos de la serie Aspire 3 A315-51, estructuralmente idéntica, basada en Intel, tienen un precio similar. Las CPU Intel en esas máquinas son sustancialmente más poderosas que la APU AMD. Además, esos modelos ofrecen un mejor aguante de la batería.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y
- 11/02/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
