Breve análisis del portátil Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G (i7-8550U, MX 150, Full-HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 397 cd/m²
Contraste: 1369:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.59
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 AU Optronics, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN AUO B173HAN01.0, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD AUO119B, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 37% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.3 | 63.1 -5% | 67.2 1% | 69.7 5% | 64 -3% | 87.1 31% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.2 | 86.5 3% | 93.1 11% | 91.2 8% | 90.2 7% | 99.9 19% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.6 | 63.3 3% | 67.4 9% | 66.8 8% | 65.4 6% | 99.4 61% |
| Response Times | 10% | -26% | -24% | 14% | -16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 38 ? 7% | 38 ? 7% | 43 ? -5% | 36 ? 12% | 50.8 -24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 27 ? 13% | 26 ? 16% | 21 ? 32% | 26 ? 16% | 33.2 -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 122000 ? | 200 ? -100% | 1000 ? -99% | |||
| Screen | -7% | -11% | -60% | -10% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 397 | 301 -24% | 318 -20% | 339 -15% | 346 -13% | 325.7 -18% |
| Brightness | 364 | 270 -26% | 295 -19% | 315 -13% | 307 -16% | 309 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 79 -6% | 79 -6% | 84 0% | 84 0% | 90 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.38 -31% | 0.25 14% | 0.35 -21% | 0.26 10% | 0.37 -28% |
| Contrast | 1369 | 792 -42% | 1272 -7% | 969 -29% | 1331 -3% | 880 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.88 | 3.49 10% | 4.7 -21% | 10.4 -168% | 4.32 -11% | 6.5 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.22 | 7.49 9% | 8.8 -7% | 15.96 -94% | 8.05 2% | 9.6 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.88 39% | 5 -61% | 11.67 -276% | 5.76 -86% | 5.6 -81% |
| Gamma | 2.59 85% | 2.35 94% | 2.28 96% | 2.32 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.59 85% |
| CCT | 6570 99% | 6587 99% | 7374 88% | 13081 50% | 6447 101% | 5860 111% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 56 2% | 61 11% | 60 9% | 59 7% | 87 58% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 86 2% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 90 7% | 100 19% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 1% /
-3% | -10% /
-10% | -26% /
-41% | 2% /
-4% | 1% /
-7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 82 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 122000 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 122000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 122000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3910 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5055 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5193 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3916 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -87% | 156% | -91% | 3% | 48% | |
| Read Seq | 480.1 | 117.6 -76% | 1606 235% | 107.1 -78% | 493.1 3% | 1076 124% |
| Write Seq | 385.6 | 109.1 -72% | 1176 205% | 103.1 -73% | 270.2 -30% | 263.2 -32% |
| Read 512 | 295.6 | 39.93 -86% | 846 186% | 28.89 -90% | 325.8 10% | 695 135% |
| Write 512 | 302.5 | 98.6 -67% | 805 166% | 27.34 -91% | 267.8 -11% | 472.3 56% |
| Read 4k | 27.58 | 0.435 -98% | 59.9 117% | 0.331 -99% | 28.4 3% | 20.09 -27% |
| Write 4k | 81.4 | 3.152 -96% | 155.6 91% | 0.831 -99% | 76.2 -6% | 116.2 43% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 247.4 | 1.008 -100% | 588 138% | 0.666 -100% | 344.6 39% | 282.7 14% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 237.7 | 4.705 -98% | 505 112% | 0.828 -100% | 267 12% | 405.2 70% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 17583 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4732 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 44475 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13140 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3207 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1668 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 162.1 | 93.3 | 78.9 | 31 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 121 | 88.4 | 63.6 | 28.6 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 67.1 | 37.2 | 20.6 | 17.4 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 29.7 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 29.7 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 34.2 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 34.4 / 34.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -23% | -2% | -5% | -24% | |
| off / environment * | 29.4 | 29.7 -1% | 30 -2% | 30 -2% | 30.7 -4% | 29.6 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.1 | 30.2 -0% | 34 -13% | 31.5 -5% | 30.7 -2% | 34.5 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 30.1 | 30.2 -0% | 35 -16% | 31.5 -5% | 30.7 -2% | 34.5 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.7 | 30.6 -3% | 36 -21% | 31.6 -6% | 31.4 -6% | 36.6 -23% |
| Load Average * | 34.4 | 33.8 2% | 47 -37% | 31.7 8% | 32.1 7% | 46.6 -35% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 42.6 -24% | 52 -51% | 34.5 -0% | 42.8 -24% | 52.3 -52% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.5 | 48 | 31.4 | 42.8 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.3 °C / 5.9 F).
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -17% | -33% | -22% | -11% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 48 -19% | 55.6 -38% | 41.9 -4% | 48.4 -20% | 48.8 -21% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37 | 40.8 -10% | 57.7 -56% | 55.8 -51% | 44.2 -19% | 38.4 -4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.3 | 29.9 -18% | 32.2 -27% | 33.4 -32% | 25.8 -2% | 24.2 4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.7 | 29.8 -21% | 27.2 -10% | 25.1 -2% | 25.5 -3% | 22.8 8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w206ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 9.3 / 9.8 Watt |
| Carga |
64 / 66.4 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, aSi TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -62% | -112% | -28% | -65% | -102% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 8.7 -112% | 11 -168% | 6.9 -68% | 7.8 -90% | 13.3 -224% |
| Idle Average * | 9.3 | 12.4 -33% | 18 -94% | 13.6 -46% | 13.3 -43% | 18.5 -99% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 15.4 -57% | 24 -145% | 14.8 -51% | 16.6 -69% | 19 -94% |
| Load Average * | 64 | 73 -14% | 84 -31% | 41 36% | 73 -14% | 78 -22% |
| Load Maximum * | 66.4 | 130 -96% | 146 -120% | 75 -13% | 140 -111% | 113.4 -71% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 98 | 101 | 33 | 118 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 40 Wh | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 UHD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -26% | 17% | -18% | 13% | -12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 560 | 795 42% | 429 -23% | 618 10% | 533 -5% | |
| H.264 | 321 | 315 -2% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 377 | 278 -26% | 380 1% | 268 -29% | 374 -1% | 286 -24% |
| Load | 89 | 96 8% | 87 -2% | 130 46% | 82 -8% |
Pro
Contra
El Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G es un portátil multimedia que se adapta bastante bien a las tareas diarias. Con la llegada de la 8ª generación de la serie Core de Intel, el rendimiento de la CPU se incrementó significativamente. El Intel Core i7-8550U tiene suficientes reservas de rendimiento para no convertirse en una pieza de hardware obsoleto en el futuro cercano. 8 GB de RAM son suficientes para la mayoría de los escenarios de uso, además de la actualización a 20 GB no debería presentar ningún problema. Una combinación de una SSD y una HDD lo convierte en un sistema muy receptivo. Por 1089 euros, los consumidores obtienen un elegante y elegante. (6,6 lbs).
Sobre todo, el Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G gana una vez más con muy buen rendimiento de la CPU mientras consume (relativamente) poca energía. Además, con la Nvidia GeForce MX150, la Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G ofrece una tarjeta gráfica básica, que puede ejecutar una amplia gama de juegos bastante bien.
La pantalla IPS pone la guinda en el relativamente buen paquete y gana con su alto brillo. Uno puede describir el adaptador de corriente como algo menor, porque la batería no debería descargarse a plena carga. Los dispositivos de entrada, del mismo modo, dejan una impresión bastante ambivalente. Sin embargo, el touchpad hace un gran trabajo, mientras que la comodidad de mecanografía del teclado sufre un poco.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L
- 10/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
