Breve análisis del portátil Acer Aspire 7 A715 (7300HQ, GTX 1050)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 |
|
iluminación: 82 %
Brillo con batería: 267 cd/m²
Contraste: 861:1 (Negro: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.65 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU BOE NV156FHM-N42 , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 BOE NV156FHM-N48, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng AU Optronics AUO41ED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T BOE, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 AU Optronics, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L LG Display, LP173WF4-SPF5, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -4% | -6% | 50% | 51% | 54% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.53 | 39.86 -2% | 38.59 -5% | 37.98 -6% | 63.1 56% | 66.3 64% | 66.5 64% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.9 | 58.7 -2% | 58 -3% | 57.1 -5% | 86.5 44% | 84.2 41% | 86.9 45% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.87 | 41.18 -2% | 39.87 -5% | 39.24 -6% | 63.3 51% | 61.6 47% | 63.5 52% |
Response Times | 10% | 18% | 41% | 24% | 180% | 6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49 ? | 42 ? 14% | 42 ? 14% | 43 ? 12% | 38 ? 22% | 41 ? 16% | 47.9 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 32 ? 11% | 28 ? 22% | 11 ? 69% | 27 ? 25% | 31 ? 14% | 33.7 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 21000 ? 5% | 122000 ? 510% | 21800 ? 9% | |||
Screen | -2% | 4% | -9% | 14% | 25% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 267 | 248 -7% | 230 -14% | 225 -16% | 301 13% | 397 49% | 296 11% |
Brightness | 250 | 237 -5% | 228 -9% | 215 -14% | 270 8% | 364 46% | 288 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 79 -4% | 88 7% | 91 11% | 79 -4% | 84 2% | 89 9% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.21 32% | 0.21 32% | 0.46 -48% | 0.38 -23% | 0.29 6% | 0.32 -3% |
Contrast | 861 | 1181 37% | 1095 27% | 489 -43% | 792 -8% | 1369 59% | 925 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.65 | 4.98 -7% | 4.01 14% | 3.94 15% | 3.49 25% | 3.88 17% | 4.3 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 8.41 -3% | 7.26 11% | 6.83 17% | 7.49 9% | 8.22 -0% | 8.7 -6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.65 | 4.26 -61% | 3.18 -20% | 2.68 -1% | 1.88 29% | 3.1 -17% | 3 -13% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.37 93% | 2.52 87% | 2.35 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.59 85% | 2.1 105% |
CCT | 6820 95% | 7149 91% | 6814 95% | 6709 97% | 6587 99% | 6570 99% | 7100 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 38 0% | 37 -3% | 36 -5% | 56 47% | 55 45% | 56.83 50% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 58 -2% | 58 -2% | 57 -3% | 86 46% | 84 42% | 86.86 47% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 2% /
0% | 6% /
4% | 9% /
-2% | 29% /
23% | 85% /
59% | 24% /
19% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida | |
↘ 16 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 93 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
49 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 25 ms subida | |
↘ 24 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 83 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 20000 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 20000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
HP Omen 15-ax213ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
Asus FX553VD-DM249T |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4055 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4890 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4908 puntos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4092 puntos | |
ayuda |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Hynix HFS128G39TND | HP Omen 15-ax213ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX553VD-DM249T Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -3% | 236% | -2% | -80% | 25% | 217% | |
Read Seq | 456 | 481.5 6% | 1657 263% | 504 11% | 117.6 -74% | 480.1 5% | 1260 176% |
Write Seq | 245 | 131.5 -46% | 1208 393% | 136.2 -44% | 109.1 -55% | 385.6 57% | 1241 407% |
Read 512 | 328.4 | 324.8 -1% | 806 145% | 340.9 4% | 39.93 -88% | 295.6 -10% | 1039 216% |
Write 512 | 146.3 | 130.6 -11% | 807 452% | 136.9 -6% | 98.6 -33% | 302.5 107% | 827 465% |
Read 4k | 31.72 | 30.81 -3% | 62.6 97% | 29.74 -6% | 0.435 -99% | 27.58 -13% | 60 89% |
Write 4k | 69.3 | 84.8 22% | 176.9 155% | 76.8 11% | 3.152 -95% | 81.4 17% | 154 122% |
Read 4k QD32 | 263.7 | 345 31% | 650 146% | 348.2 32% | 1.008 -100% | 247.4 -6% | 526 99% |
Write 4k QD32 | 165.7 | 131.6 -21% | 557 236% | 136.4 -18% | 4.705 -97% | 237.7 43% | 435 163% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7466 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 123908 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14777 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5346 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2639 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 230.2 | 172.6 | 156.9 | 64.3 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 195.5 | 167.4 | 131.4 | 52.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 124.8 | 69.4 | 38.5 | 31.2 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 33.6 / 43.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -15% | -11% | 1% | 5% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 30 1% | 30.8 -1% | 29.7 2% | 29.4 3% | 31 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 32 -5% | 32.9 -8% | 30.2 1% | 30.1 1% | 31 -2% |
Idle Average * | 30.8 | 30.5 1% | 34 -10% | 32.9 -7% | 30.2 2% | 30.1 2% | 31 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.8 | 30.9 -0% | 36 -17% | 33.5 -9% | 30.6 1% | 29.7 4% | 32.6 -6% |
Load Average * | 33.6 | 35.7 -6% | 48 -43% | 43.7 -30% | 33.8 -1% | 34.4 -2% | 41.6 -24% |
Load Maximum * | 43.4 | 35.6 18% | 51 -18% | 47 -8% | 42.6 2% | 34.4 21% | 44.7 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 46.2 | 39.5 | 41.6 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.6 °C / 6.4 F).
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | HP Omen 15-ax213ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus FX553VD-DM249T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | -13% | 7% | -3% | 12% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 43.4 -4% | 52.4 -26% | 44.2 -6% | 48 -15% | 40.4 3% | 43.8 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.5 | 38.1 10% | 54.2 -28% | 40 6% | 40.8 4% | 37 13% | 44.9 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.7 | 24.8 16% | 30.5 -3% | 25.1 15% | 29.9 -1% | 25.3 15% | 25.9 13% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.4 | 25.2 14% | 28.2 4% | 25.8 12% | 29.8 -1% | 24.7 16% | 26.3 11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.38 Watt |
Ocioso | 4 / 6.9 / 9.4 Watt |
Carga |
72.6 / 122 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, aSi TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 19% | -46% | 0% | -54% | 3% | 20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.8 5% | 6 -50% | 4 -0% | 8.7 -118% | 4.1 -3% | 3.7 7% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 6.5 6% | 11 -59% | 6.7 3% | 12.4 -80% | 9.3 -35% | 7.5 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 9.1 3% | 18 -91% | 9.6 -2% | 15.4 -64% | 9.8 -4% | 8 15% |
Load Average * | 72.6 | 53.4 26% | 81 -12% | 81 -12% | 73 -1% | 64 12% | 49 33% |
Load Maximum * | 122 | 55.6 54% | 146 -20% | 107 12% | 130 -7% | 66.4 46% | 55.2 55% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 | 90 | 98 | 50.6 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 49.7 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax213ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 52% | 6% | -11% | -17% | 2% | 72% | |
Reader / Idle | 592 | 765 29% | 587 -1% | 560 -5% | |||
H.264 | 306 | 196 -36% | 321 5% | 632 107% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 336 | 511 52% | 428 27% | 360 7% | 278 -17% | 377 12% | 597 78% |
Load | 94 | 97 3% | 56 -40% | 89 -5% | 122 30% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 83 |
Pro
Contra
El Acer Aspire 7 A715 es un portátil multimedia con un buen rendimiento del sistema para dominar las tareas diarias. Además, el dispositivo es adecuado como un portátil gaming asequible, ya que la Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 tiene suficientes reservas. La combinación de SSD y disco duro convencional también tiene sentido, ya que combina velocidad y mucho espacio de almacenamiento. Junto con los 8 GB de memoria RAM DDR4 y el panel Full HD IPS, Acer cobra 899 euros por el dispositivo.
Como un paquete todoterreno sin preocupaciones, el Acer Aspire 7 A715 debería ser capaz de convencer a uno u otro comprador, ya que puedes jugar incluso algunos de lo juegos más exigentes sin problemas con la Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050.
Puede ver a primera vista que el dispositivo es un portátil Acer. Los dispositivos de la serie Aspire son muy similares entre sí, y apenas existen características únicas. Dado que la mano de obra no está en el nivel que esperábamos, el caso de nuestra unidad de prueba no encaja en absoluto con el concepto, que es básicamente bueno. Pero los crujidos, una tapa de pantalla que se puede torcer y los bordes afilados son decisivos. Los resultados de la pantalla son igualmente desilusionantes. Los ángulos de visión del panel IPS incorporado son estables, tiene una superficie mate y las desviaciones DeltaE-2000 son muy bajas. Pero eso es todo en términos de las características positivas. La cobertura del espacio de color y el brillo de la pantalla son demasiado bajos. Las conexiones son buenas, pero no son a prueba de futuro. Es encomiable que Acer incluya una conexión USB-3.1 tipo C. Sin embargo, el fabricante debería haberlo hecho sin el puerto Gen-1 y utilizó un puerto Gen-2 en su lugar.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
- 11/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade