Breve análisis del portátil Acer Aspire 7 (Core i7, GTX 1060)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 382 cd/m²
Contraste: 1005:1 (Negro: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY LG Philips LGD056D / LP173WF4-SPF5, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN AUO B173HAN01.0, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 67.2 2% | 64 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 85.2 | 93.1 9% | 90.2 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.3 | 67.4 8% | 65.4 5% |
| Response Times | -32% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 38 ? 7% | 36 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 26 ? -4% | 26 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 125000 ? | 200 ? -100% | |
| Screen | 14% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 382 | 318 -17% | 346 -9% |
| Brightness | 357 | 295 -17% | 307 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 79 -8% | 84 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.25 34% | 0.26 32% |
| Contrast | 1005 | 1272 27% | 1331 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 4.7 32% | 4.32 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.14 | 8.8 33% | 8.05 39% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.22 | 5 39% | 5.76 30% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 7580 86% | 7374 88% | 6447 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 61 9% | 59 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 93 9% | 90 6% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -4% /
4% | 8% /
11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 125000 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 125000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 125000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3687 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4636 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 24522% | 13109% | |
| Read Seq | 108.7 | 1606 1377% | 493.1 354% |
| Write Seq | 100.7 | 1176 1068% | 270.2 168% |
| Read 512 | 29.74 | 846 2745% | 325.8 995% |
| Write 512 | 28.06 | 805 2769% | 267.8 854% |
| Read 4k | 0.345 | 59.9 17262% | 28.4 8132% |
| Write 4k | 0.78 | 155.6 19849% | 76.2 9669% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.688 | 588 85365% | 344.6 49987% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.767 | 505 65741% | 267 34711% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11276 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24048 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9743 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69.9 | 38.5 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 52.5 | |||
| For Honor (2017) | 70.5 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.7 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.7 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 35.2 / 43.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w206ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.43 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 12.3 / 14.2 Watt |
| Carga |
72.6 / 153 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 11 -57% | 7.8 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 12.3 | 18 -46% | 13.3 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.2 | 24 -69% | 16.6 -17% |
| Load Average * | 72.6 | 84 -16% | 73 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 125 | 101 19% | 118 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 153 | 146 5% | 140 8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 29% | 28% | -41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 552 | 795 44% | 618 12% | 301 -45% |
| H.264 | 284 | 315 11% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 336 | 380 13% | 374 11% | 163 -51% |
| Load | 74 | 96 30% | 130 76% | 55 -26% |
Pro
Contra
Mientras que nuestra lista de contras es más larga de lo esperado cuando comenzamos a revisar este portátil, el veredicto general permanece sin cambios. El nuevo Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY puede ser visto como un portátil multimedia con ambiciones gaming serias o como un portátil gaming con capacidades multimedia viables. De cualquier manera: por su precio actual de 1400 Euros consigues la esencia de un portátil de juegos de 1700 € sin las ostentaciones extra como G-Sync, teclas macro programables, retroiluminación de teclado RGB multizona, herramientas para monitoreo, ajuste y overclocking, y una mejor selección de puertos.
El único fallo real es la ausencia de almacenamiento SSD en nuestro modelo de análisis. El funcionamiento, sin embargo, es impecable, y se le puede instalar el almacenaje del SSD. La solución de enfriamiento del portátil es muy silenciosa y eficiente, fue particularmente impresionante.
Por lo tanto, desde el punto de vista de un gamer consciente de los precios, los únicos elementos que quedan en nuestra lista de contras son la configuración de RAM, el desmontaje complejo y los tiempos de respuesta subpar de la pantalla. Si usted está buscando un portátil de oficina o un dispositivo portable para edición de fotos, busque en otra parte. De lo contrario, no vemos por qué no debemos dar una recomendación para comprar el nuevo Aspire 7, sobre todo teniendo en cuenta su bajo precio.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY
- 08/17/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
