Breve análisis del portátil Acer Aspire VX 15 VX5-591G (7300HQ, GTX 1050, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 1065:1 (Negro: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax007ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -5% | -9% | 24% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.56 | 38.88 -4% | 37.98 -6% | 36.42 -10% | 59.9 48% 40.34 -1% | 38.03 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.4 | 58.2 -2% | 57.1 -4% | 54.9 -8% | 85.9 45% 60.3 2% | 56.5 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.9 | 40.2 -4% | 39.24 -6% | 37.62 -10% | 61.6 47% 41.73 0% | 39.29 -6% |
| Response Times | 42% | 38% | 8% | -6% | 12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 22 ? 52% | 43 ? 7% | 36 ? 22% | 55 ? -20% | 44.4 ? 3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 23 ? 32% | 11 ? 68% | 36 ? -6% | 31 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -11% | -12% | -80% | -25% | -41% | |
| Brightness middle | 277 | 281 1% | 225 -19% | 246 -11% | 214 -23% | 209.7 -24% |
| Brightness | 268 | 257 -4% | 215 -20% | 235 -12% | 203 -24% | 193 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 85 -7% | 91 0% | 75 -18% | 79 -13% | 75 -18% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.46 -77% | 0.55 -112% | 0.28 -8% | 0.19 27% |
| Contrast | 1065 | 878 -18% | 489 -54% | 447 -58% | 764 -28% | 1104 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.05 | 5.16 -2% | 3.94 22% | 10.97 -117% | 6.04 -20% | 7.8 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.93 | 9.09 -2% | 6.83 24% | 12 -34% | 24.1 -170% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.97 | 4.57 -54% | 2.68 10% | 14.25 -380% | 5.91 -99% | 7.3 -146% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.59 85% | 2.35 94% | 1.83 120% | 2.44 90% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 6466 101% | 6931 94% | 6709 97% | 11200 58% | 7362 88% | 5771 113% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37 -3% | 36 -5% | 35 -8% | 38 0% | 39.3 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 58 -2% | 57 -3% | 55 -7% | 60 2% | 56.5 -4% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 9% /
-3% | 7% /
-4% | -27% /
-53% | -2% /
-7% | -12% /
-27% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 20000 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 20000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 20000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 90 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 46 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 25 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 77 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3661 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Asus FX553VD-DM249T Hynix HFS128G39TND | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -84% | -7% | 42% | -0% | 35% | |
| Read Seq | 510 | 101.5 -80% | 504 -1% | 485.8 -5% | 475.7 -7% | 522 2% |
| Write Seq | 137.6 | 100.6 -27% | 136.2 -1% | 422.8 207% | 169.2 23% | 476.6 246% |
| Read 512 | 362.1 | 28.33 -92% | 340.9 -6% | 338.9 -6% | 327.6 -10% | 399.7 10% |
| Write 512 | 137.2 | 28.31 -79% | 136.9 0% | 304 122% | 169.6 24% | 185.4 35% |
| Read 4k | 35.18 | 0.327 -99% | 29.74 -15% | 27.11 -23% | 33.14 -6% | 33.12 -6% |
| Write 4k | 104.8 | 0.846 -99% | 76.8 -27% | 85.4 -19% | 81.4 -22% | 89.8 -14% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 375.8 | 0.718 -100% | 348.2 -7% | 279.6 -26% | 276.8 -26% | 400.9 7% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 138.1 | 0.893 -99% | 136.4 -1% | 255.1 85% | 168 22% | 140.2 2% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7226 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 206.5 | 160 | 147.5 | 63.6 |
| Mad Max (2015) | 140.4 | 70.1 | 64.3 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 185.2 | 139.7 | 76.4 | 63.6 |
| Just Cause 3 (2015) | 78.6 | 67.1 | 48.3 | 32.2 |
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 78.9 | 42.6 | 28.9 | 13.8 |
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 90 | 49 | 43 | 31 |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 216.5 | 100.3 | 56.6 | 21.4 |
| For Honor (2017) | 146.8 | 60.1 | 57 | 40.6 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 81.8 | 36 | 34.4 | 18.5 |
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 75.7 | 41.5 | 26.4 | 24 |
| Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 81 | 36.5 | 23.2 | 20.2 |
| Prey (2017) | 125.2 | 82.5 | 68.1 | 53 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 31.1 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.2 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 31.3 / 38.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8.4 / 13.1 / 14.2 Watt |
| Carga |
50 / 111 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Pro
Contra
El portátil de gama de entrada de Acer tiene un precio de £799.99. A cambio, obtienes un portátil de 15.6 pulgadas con un potente procesador Kaby Lake de cuatro núcleos y una gráfica GeForce GTX 1050. El hardware permite ejecutar los títulos más recientes con fluidez en alta resolución y ajustes medios. En algunos (pocos) casos es necesario reducir la resolución o la calidad. El dispositivo se mantiene silencioso en reposo y no se calienta demasiado. Incluso bajo carga, las emisiones se mantienen en un nivel bajo.
El Aspire no tiene ningún defecto grave. Por £800, obtienes un dispositivo de gama de entrada bien equipado, una buena introducción al mundo de portátiles para juegos.
Una unidad de estado solido asegura un sistema rápido. El dispositivo proporciona un espacio de almacenamiento extra necesario para un portátil de juegos gracias a un disco duro de 2.5 pulgadas. Ambas unidades son reemplazables, lo que implicaría extraer la cubierta inferior completamente - operación no demasiado complicada. La pantalla IPS mate tiene buenos ángulos de visualización y un buen contraste. El brillo de la pantalla es bueno, pero podría ser mejor.
La unidad alemana vino sin sistema operativo Windows preinstalado. Una forma barata de obtener una licencia de Windows 10 es a traves de Windows 7/8.1. Si instalas una de las versiones anteriores de Windows con una licencia usada (de £5 a £10), puedes obtener una actualización gratuita a Windows 10 con la ayuda de la herramienta Microsoft Media Creation.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S
- 05/22/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
