Breve análisis del portátil Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
Connectivity
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 80 %
Brillo con batería: 270 cd/m²
Contraste: 474:1 (Negro: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 12.73 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Medion Akoya S4219 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE TN, 1366x768, 13.3" | HP Stream 13-c102ng TN, 1366x768, 13.3" | HP Chromebook 14 G1 TN, 1366x768, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 45% | 20% | -1% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.97 | 40.68 -1% | 61.7 51% | 49.25 20% | 40.68 -1% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.5 | 60.6 -1% | 84.8 38% | 73.5 20% | 59.8 -3% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.35 | 42.08 -1% | 62 46% | 50.9 20% | 42.32 0% | |
| Response Times | -9% | -12% | -2% | -8% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 49.6 ? -55% | 33 ? -3% | 44.4 ? -39% | 45 ? -41% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 21.6 ? 28% | 17 ? 43% | 20.4 ? 32% | 25 ? 17% | |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? 0% | 50 ? -75% | 200 ? 0% | 201 ? 1% | |
| Screen | -31% | 28% | -36% | -22% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 270 | 231 -14% | 216 -20% | 206 -24% | 190 -30% | 226 -16% |
| Brightness | 247 | 213 -14% | 211 -15% | 200 -19% | 179 -28% | 227 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 87 9% | 65 -19% | 84 5% | 85 6% | 86 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.47 18% | 0.2 65% | 0.6 -5% | 0.33 42% | 0.4 30% |
| Contrast | 474 | 491 4% | 1080 128% | 343 -28% | 576 22% | 565 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.01 | 9.1 -202% | 3.7 -23% | 9.2 -206% | 9.84 -227% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.33 | 14.88 -135% | 5.88 7% | 14.8 -134% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.73 | 9.55 25% | 2.67 79% | 10.94 14% | 10.32 19% | |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.65 83% | 2.76 80% | 2.48 89% | |
| CCT | 14629 44% | 11384 57% | 6418 101% | 13282 49% | 11884 55% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 38.84 0% | 55 41% | 46.92 20% | 38 -3% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 60.59 -2% | 85 37% | 73.36 18% | 60 -3% | |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -14% /
-21% | 20% /
24% | -6% /
-19% | -10% /
-15% | 7% /
7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |   |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 200 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 200 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 39 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2114 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2302 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 1595 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 128 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM 32 GB eMMC Flash | Medion Akoya S4219 128 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | HP Stream 13-c102ng 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -11% | -3% | -53% | 1% | |
| Read Seq | 166.5 | 173.5 4% | 151.2 -9% | 116.4 -30% | 152.8 -8% |
| Write Seq | 85 | 77.9 -8% | 55.7 -34% | 120.7 42% | 76.9 -10% |
| Read 512 | 153.8 | 154.8 1% | 156.6 2% | 37.01 -76% | 167 9% |
| Write 512 | 75.6 | 64.1 -15% | 46.9 -38% | 73.1 -3% | 22.79 -70% |
| Read 4k | 13.2 | 15.88 20% | 16.29 23% | 0.507 -96% | 18.28 38% |
| Write 4k | 13.04 | 8.583 -34% | 16.5 27% | 4.156 -68% | 16.78 29% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 35.12 | 25.73 -27% | 20.62 -41% | 0.967 -97% | 31.59 -10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 12.66 | 8.656 -32% | 18.86 49% | 0.652 -95% | 16.08 27% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 565 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 21.8 | 10.4 | 6.5 | |
| Dead Space 3 (2013) | 43.2 | 19.6 | 14.3 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 23.2 | 11.8 | 10 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 16.5 | 12.5 | 8.3 | |
| Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014) | 14 | 9.1 | ||
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 18.9 | 13.6 | ||
| Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 12.1 | 7.6 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 35.2 | 22.8 | ||
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 10.8 | 6.9 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 15.3 | 8.9 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 7.1 | 4.2 | ||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 10.5 | 6.1 | ||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 12.2 | 5.2 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 31.3 | 21.3 | ||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 14.4 | 10.5 | ||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 13.5 | 11 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.16 / 0.36 Watt |
| Ocioso |  4.1 / 8.3 / 8.6 Watt |
| Carga |
13.5 / 14.5 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6 | |
| Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
| HP Chromebook 14 G1 | |
| HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
| Medion Akoya S4219 | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Pro
Contra
El Swift 1 es el modelo más barato y de menor rendimiento de la gama Swift de Acer. Sin embargo no tiene nada de lo que avergonzarse. A pesar de que la carcasa está fabricada sobre todo en plástico, el Swift 1 tiene cierto estilo. Esto se debe también a su fina carcasa. El Swift 1 no puede competir con los procesadores Core i o Core m de dispositivos más caros. El procesador Pentium N3710 que se incluye es adecuado para aplicaciones básicas de oficina e Internet.
Con este dispositivo Acer ha conseguido un equipo duradero para escritores o navegantes de la web. El precio de poco más de 400 euros lo convierte en un dispositivo asequible para estudiantes.
El portátil funciona siempre en silencio y no se calienta en exceso. La unidad de almacenamiento tiene una capacidad de 128 GB de los que casi 96 quedan a disposición del usuario. Esto debería ser suficiente para la mayoría de los usuarios. El portátil no tiene teclado retroiluminado, pero es muy cómodo de usar y adecuado para escritores frecuentes. A todo esto hay que añadir la soberbia duración de batería. El relativamente bajo precio se nota en la pantalla, Acer ha instalado un panel oscuro, con escaso contraste y malos ángulos de visualización. Sin embargo la pantalla es aceptable a la vista del bajo precio.
Finalmente, una lista de deseos de cara a un posible sucesor: Querido Acer, además de un SoC Apollo, nos gustaría un teclado retroiluminado y al menos un USB Type-C. Una pantalla IPS sería la guinda perfecta, pero esto posiblemente sea imposible visto el precio del Swift 1.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Swift 1 SF114-31-P6F6
- 02/09/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
