Breve análisis del portátil Acer Swift 3 SF315 (8250U, MX150, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 79 %
Brillo con batería: 249 cd/m²
Contraste: 1181:1 (Negro: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.18% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.86% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -4% | -8% | -2% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.86 | 39.28 -1% | 37.98 -5% | 36.24 -9% | 38.81 -3% | 39.02 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.7 | 58.9 0% | 57.1 -3% | 54.6 -7% | 57.9 -1% | 57.7 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.18 | 40.59 -1% | 39.24 -5% | 37.44 -9% | 40.03 -3% | 40.31 -2% |
| Response Times | -7% | 32% | 27% | 10% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 51.6 ? -23% | 43 ? -2% | 43 ? -2% | 38.8 ? 8% | 42 ? -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 29.2 ? 9% | 11 ? 66% | 14 ? 56% | 28 ? 12% | 32 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 1087 ? -95% | ||||
| Screen | -10% | -11% | -66% | -7% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 248 | 256 3% | 225 -9% | 145 -42% | 256.6 3% | 248 0% |
| Brightness | 237 | 241 2% | 215 -9% | 144 -39% | 243 3% | 239 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 88 11% | 91 15% | 90 14% | 81 3% | 69 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.21 -0% | 0.46 -119% | 0.49 -133% | 0.19 10% | 0.18 14% |
| Contrast | 1181 | 1219 3% | 489 -59% | 296 -75% | 1351 14% | 1378 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.98 | 5.2 -4% | 3.94 21% | 9.27 -86% | 5 -0% | 4.85 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.41 | 19.3 -129% | 6.83 19% | 16.9 -101% | 20.1 -139% | 8.34 1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.26 | 3.5 18% | 2.68 37% | 12.28 -188% | 2.7 37% | 3.84 10% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.35 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.03 108% | 2.32 95% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 7149 91% | 6576 99% | 6709 97% | 10732 61% | 6599 98% | 6790 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37 -3% | 36 -5% | 35 -8% | 36.7 -3% | 37 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 59 2% | 57 -2% | 55 -5% | 57.7 -1% | 57 -2% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -6% /
-8% | 6% /
-4% | -16% /
-42% | 0% /
-4% | -10% /
-5% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 21000 Hz | ≤ 80 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 21000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 80 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 21000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 15 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
| Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3935 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5065 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4992 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3802 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Hynix HFS128G39TND | Asus FX553VD-DM249T Hynix HFS128G39TND | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 2% | 61% | -5% | 34% | |
| Read Seq | 481.5 | 504 5% | 502 4% | 491.6 2% | 462.2 -4% |
| Write Seq | 131.5 | 136.2 4% | 458.1 248% | 141.7 8% | 409.9 212% |
| Read 512 | 324.8 | 340.9 5% | 382.8 18% | 345.6 6% | 310.3 -4% |
| Write 512 | 130.6 | 136.9 5% | 385.7 195% | 142.6 9% | 216.6 66% |
| Read 4k | 30.81 | 29.74 -3% | 29.25 -5% | 18.83 -39% | 31.89 4% |
| Write 4k | 84.8 | 76.8 -9% | 55.9 -34% | 76.3 -10% | 73.2 -14% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 345 | 348.2 1% | 285.2 -17% | 348.5 1% | 287.9 -17% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 131.6 | 136.4 4% | 239.6 82% | 104.8 -20% | 170.6 30% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 22407 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4918 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 82307 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13562 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3289 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1201 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 139.6 | 108 | 89.5 | 34 |
| X-Plane 10.25 (2013) | 104.2 | 54.6 | 29.8 | 21.9 |
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 229.2 | 99.3 | 52.2 | 27 |
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 72.8 | 25.9 | 15.8 | 7.1 |
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 45.2 | 45.5 | 25.9 | 24.5 |
| Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 95.8 | 61.7 | 31.4 | 22.7 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 121.7 | 87.4 | 66.8 | 41.9 |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 81.4 | 54.5 | 39.5 | 23.4 |
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 99.7 | 70.7 | 28.5 | 22.2 |
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 101 | 94 | 80.3 | 75.1 |
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 52.7 | 13.3 | 10.2 | |
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 174.2 | 99.8 | 76.6 | 59.5 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
| HP Pavilion Power 15t-cb2000 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
| Titanfall 2 - 1366x768 Medium / Disabled AF:4x | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
| Overwatch - 1920x1080 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.9 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 35.7 / 35.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.6 °C / 2.8 F).
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.5 / 9.1 Watt |
| Carga |
53.4 / 55.6 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
La máquina multimedia multitalentantosa de 15,6" de Acer reproduce sin problemas los juegos actuales en su pantalla Full HD brillante. También da una buena impresión en todos los demás ámbitos, sin importar el tipo de aplicación. El dispositivo nunca parece particularmente cálido o ruidoso. El nuevo procesador de cuatro núcleos ULV ofrece mucha potencia.
Un SSD permite que el sistema se ejecute rápidamente. Además, Acer instaló un HDD de 1 TB y 2,5" en la carcasa del portátil. El teclado retroiluminado Swift 3 nos impresionó y es adecuado para usuarios que escriben mucho. Un excelente aguante de la batería condecora el paquete.
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G es una máquina multimedia todoterreno y multitalentosa, pero tiene algunas debilidades.
Acer cometió algunos errores en el ámbito de la pantalla. Sí, el panel IPS muestra el contenido de la pantalla con precisión desde cualquier ángulo de visión, el contraste es bueno y la representación del color es razonablemente fiel. Pero para un portátil en este rango de precios, el brillo de la pantalla es demasiado bajo. Para empeorar las cosas, Acer eligió un panel con una superficie lustrosa. Una pantalla como esta no pertenece a un dispositivo móvil.
La siguiente crítica es la elección de los altavoces. El sonido no es adecuado para un portátil multimedia. Felicitamos a Acer por equipar el ordenador con un puerto USB 3.1 de Tipo C, pero debería haber sido un puerto Gen 2. Acer eligió un puerto Gen 1 en su lugar.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5
- 10/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
