Breve análisis del portátil Acer Swift 3 SF315 (i5-7200U, GeForce MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 69 %
Brillo con batería: 252 cd/m²
Contraste: 1378:1 (Negro: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.02% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T BOE, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 0% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.02 | 37.98 -3% | 38.88 0% | 38.65 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.7 | 57.1 -1% | 58.2 1% | 58 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.31 | 39.24 -3% | 40.2 0% | 39.94 -1% |
| Response Times | 32% | 38% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 43 ? -2% | 22 ? 48% | 44.8 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 11 ? 66% | 23 ? 28% | 25.6 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 1087 ? | |||
| Screen | -14% | -10% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 248 | 225 -9% | 281 13% | 242 -2% |
| Brightness | 239 | 215 -10% | 257 8% | 243 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 69 | 91 32% | 85 23% | 75 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.46 -156% | 0.32 -78% | 0.24 -33% |
| Contrast | 1378 | 489 -65% | 878 -36% | 1008 -27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.85 | 3.94 19% | 5.16 -6% | 4.65 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.34 | 6.83 18% | 9.09 -9% | 9.64 -16% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 2.68 30% | 4.57 -19% | 3.39 12% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.59 85% | 2.7 81% |
| CCT | 6790 96% | 6709 97% | 6931 94% | 6246 104% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 36 -3% | 37 0% | 36.69 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 57 0% | 58 2% | 57.66 1% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 5% /
-6% | 9% /
-2% | 1% /
-3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 1087 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 1087 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 1087 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8702 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3719 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4577 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Asus FX553VD-DM249T Hynix HFS128G39TND | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -11% | -91% | 81% | |
| Read Seq | 462.2 | 504 9% | 101.5 -78% | 1140 147% |
| Write Seq | 409.9 | 136.2 -67% | 100.6 -75% | 468.1 14% |
| Read 512 | 310.3 | 340.9 10% | 28.33 -91% | 759 145% |
| Write 512 | 216.6 | 136.9 -37% | 28.31 -87% | 414 91% |
| Read 4k | 31.89 | 29.74 -7% | 0.327 -99% | 34.3 8% |
| Write 4k | 73.2 | 76.8 5% | 0.846 -99% | 123.4 69% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 287.9 | 348.2 21% | 0.718 -100% | 530 84% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 170.6 | 136.4 -20% | 0.893 -99% | 319.2 87% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4507 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9757 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3104 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 42.3 | 21.8 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 68.8 | 43.2 | ||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 71.4 | 27.2 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 36.9 / 36 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.7 / 6.2 / 8.4 Watt |
| Carga |
50 / 65.2 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | -74% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 4 -8% | 7 -89% | 2.8 24% |
| Idle Average * | 6.2 | 6.7 -8% | 10.2 -65% | 6.3 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 9.6 -14% | 14 -67% | 6.9 18% |
| Load Average * | 50 | 81 -62% | 78 -56% | 51.6 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 65.2 | 107 -64% | 127 -95% | 69.7 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh | Asus FX553VD-DM249T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -42% | -50% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 916 | 587 -36% | 322 -65% | 883 -4% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 509 | 360 -29% | 302 -41% | 462 -9% |
| Load | 146 | 56 -62% | 81 -45% | 129 -12% |
Pro
Contra
Si consideras el alto precio actual alrededor de 950 euros del nuevo Acer Aspire Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9, sólo la pantalla sub-óptima - que no es terrible - y en particular el sonido bastante malo del recién llegado están por debajo del precio. Visualmente, todo sería genial, si no fuera por esas huellas dactilares molestas y difíciles de limpiar. Pero tal vez el dispositivo se ve bien de nuevo después de haberlo tocado por todas partes.
Si ignoramos las superficies, la carcasa consigue puntos con las dimensiones relativamente pequeñas y un peso limitado, diferenciándose así de una buena parte de la competencia. No hay nada quejarse de la mano de obra. Gracias a los buenos dispositivos de entrada, TPM, lector de huellas, y una resistencia decente, el ligero, compacto, silencioso y fresco Swift 3 es muy adecuado para el uso de un portátil de oficina. Y no menos importante con la nueva Nvidia GeForce MX150, finalmente hay un sucesor utilizable de la vieja tarjeta de 940MX sobrante a bordo, por lo que el juego casual es posible con imágenes buenas o al menos aceptables.
Con el nuevo Swift 3, Acer trae un conjunto multiuso exitoso con ambiciones de juego al mercado, que seguramente encontrará algunos compradores con la combinación de una carcasa compacta y ligera y características de seguridad, aunque no se libra de las debilidades.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9
- 10/04/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
