Breve análisis del portátil Asus AsusPro B9440UA (Core i5, 8 GB)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng |
|
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 321 cd/m²
Contraste: 1227:1 (Negro: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.61 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.02% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.01% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T AU Optronics AUO353D / B140HAN03.5, , 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 0% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 66.1 3% | 64.6 1% | 65.3 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 89.1 | 84.8 -5% | 88.8 0% | 82.9 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 62 -5% | 64.8 -1% | 60.6 -7% |
Response Times | 26% | -1% | 7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.8 ? | 36 ? 26% | 46 ? 6% | 45 ? 8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 23.2 ? 25% | 33 ? -7% | 29 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | 8% | 12% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 319 | 291 -9% | 404 27% | 343 8% |
Brightness | 294 | 296 1% | 382 30% | 306 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 84 -3% | 91 5% | 81 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.35 -35% | 0.3 -15% |
Contrast | 1227 | 909 -26% | 1154 -6% | 1143 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 4.3 39% | 5.37 24% | 4.73 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.7 | 7.5 45% | 9.46 31% | 9.05 34% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.61 | 4.3 55% | 6.44 33% | 3.29 66% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.31 95% | 2.52 87% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 6021 108% | 6529 100% | 6738 96% | 6437 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54.01 | 55.46 3% | 58 7% | 54 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83.02 | 84.77 2% | 89 7% | 83 0% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 11% /
9% | 4% /
8% | 5% /
8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
30.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 8 ms subida | |
↘ 22.8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 81 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
48.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida | |
↘ 30.8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 83 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3714 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4630 puntos | |
ayuda |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 15% | 112% | 149% | |
Read Seq | 462 | 504 9% | 1090 136% | 1577 241% |
Write Seq | 441.4 | 497.8 13% | 1088 146% | 1472 233% |
Read 512 | 323.2 | 396.7 23% | 753 133% | 1165 260% |
Write 512 | 398.8 | 283.4 -29% | 911 128% | 1244 212% |
Read 4k | 26.81 | 35.73 33% | 57.5 114% | 54.8 104% |
Write 4k | 87.8 | 87.8 0% | 140.2 60% | 121.5 38% |
Read 4k QD32 | 247.3 | 399.1 61% | 497.1 101% | 407.5 65% |
Write 4k QD32 | 232.1 | 249.7 8% | 416 79% | 321.4 38% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1715 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6478 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 891 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.8 | |||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 13.7 | |||
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 24.4 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 36.7 / 40.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.48 / 0.5 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.1 / 6.1 / 6.8 Watt |
Carga |
27.4 / 43.7 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | -12% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 4.11 -33% | 3.6 -16% | 3.6 -16% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 7.87 -29% | 6.4 -5% | 7.4 -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 8.74 -29% | 9.2 -35% | 8.7 -28% |
Load Average * | 27.4 | 30.2 -10% | 34 -24% | 43 -57% |
Load Maximum * | 43.7 | 32.4 26% | 34.4 21% | 42 4% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -19% | -34% | -41% | |
Reader / Idle | 1137 | 782 -31% | 718 -37% | 468 -59% |
WiFi v1.3 | 531 | 430 -19% | 394 -26% | 338 -36% |
Load | 126 | 117 -7% | 77 -39% | 89 -29% |
H.264 | 490 | 367 |
Pro
Contra
Asus ha aprovechado la oportunidad de eliminar todos los puertos que pueden encontrarse habitualmente en portátiles y muy pocos usuarios se sentirán defraudados por contar solo con dos puertos USB-C. Pero de otra manera habría sido imposible conseguir un portátil de 15mm de ancho y de solo 1.05 kg de peso.
Es lo único de lo que se ha tenido que prescindir sin embargo. La calidad premium de sus dispositivos de entrada va acorde a su elevado precio, el hub para puertos y la carcasa incluidos son más que bienvenidos y las características de seguridad reflejan el elevado compromiso con la movilidad del dispositivo. Además es uno de los portátiles más silenciosos que hemos probado en los últimos meses y la duración de más que destacable. Además de los puertos, los otros inconvenientes en nuestra lista pueden ser considerados poco importantes.
El AsusPro B9440UA es un portátil orientado a movilidad centrándose en la conectividad inalámbrica y sin debilidades obvias. A pesar de la buena impresión general, se queda a un paso de la excelencia.
Desde nuestro punto de vista el modelo europeo que probamos (GV0100T disponible por unos $1,200) es la elección más adecuada (incluso a pesar del precio inferior de solo $1,000 para el modelo básico mejor equipado del otro lado del atlántico), y sin duda lo recomendamos.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T
- 05/21/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn