Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del portátil Asus VivoBook X751BP (AMD A9-9420, HD+)
Connectivity
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-y044ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-x066ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| HP 17-y044ng (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| HP 17-y044ng (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 591:1 (Negro: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T AU Optronics AUO B173RTN01.1, 1600x900, 17.3" | Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE AU Optronics B173RTN02.1, 1600x900, 17.3" | Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP 17-y044ng AU Optronics, 1600x900, 17.3" | HP 17-x066ng AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | 10% | -9% | 10% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 55.5 | 50.5 -9% | 66.5 20% | 50.9 -8% | 63.6 15% |
| sRGB Coverage | 81.9 | 73.3 -11% | 84.5 3% | 73.8 -10% | 86.5 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 57.4 | 52.1 -9% | 61.8 8% | 52.6 -8% | 63.3 10% |
| Response Times | -9% | 19789% | -22% | -27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 40 ? 15% | 35 ? 26% | 43 ? 9% | 38 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15 ? | 20 ? -33% | 24 ? -60% | 23 ? -53% | 26 ? -73% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 119000 ? 59400% | |||
| Screen | -60% | 17% | -53% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 266 | 205 -23% | 412 55% | 264 -1% | 331 24% |
| Brightness | 259 | 209 -19% | 377 46% | 232 -10% | 310 20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 81 -2% | 83 0% | 80 -4% | 87 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.55 -22% | 0.39 13% | 0.59 -31% | 0.33 27% |
| Contrast | 591 | 373 -37% | 1056 79% | 447 -24% | 1003 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.53 | 11.26 -149% | 5.04 -11% | 10.58 -134% | 4.58 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 19.86 -176% | 8.84 -23% | 18.96 -163% | 7.83 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.48 | 13.85 -153% | 5.28 4% | 13.13 -140% | 6.18 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% | 2.49 88% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 7726 84% | 15307 42% | 6900 94% | 14044 46% | 6076 107% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 53 | 47 -11% | 55 4% | 48 -9% | 56 6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 73 -11% | 84 2% | 74 -10% | 86 5% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -26% /
-43% | 6605% /
3723% | -28% /
-40% | -1% /
7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 9 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 32 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 26 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 79 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 200 Hz | ≤ 40 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 200 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 40 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 200 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2745 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2879 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3046 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND | HP 17-y044ng WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0 | HP 17-x066ng WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 444% | 116318% | 1433% | 1368% | |
| Read Seq | 48.63 | 98.6 103% | 473.7 874% | 105.5 117% | 98.6 103% |
| Write Seq | 55.8 | 87 56% | 260.8 367% | 102 83% | 98.2 76% |
| Read 512 | 22.3 | 30.3 36% | 337 1411% | 19.17 -14% | 33.8 52% |
| Write 512 | 91.9 | 92.2 0% | 263.3 187% | 28.27 -69% | 45.98 -50% |
| Read 4k | 0.461 | 0.448 -3% | 29.41 6280% | 0.328 -29% | 0.395 -14% |
| Write 4k | 0.009 | 0.316 3411% | 73.3 814344% | 1.013 11156% | 0.96 10567% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.074 | 1.088 1% | 298.3 27675% | 0.891 -17% | 1.039 -3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.305 | 0.154 -50% | 242.5 79408% | 1.03 238% | 0.959 214% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1387 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.4 | 0 () | 0 () | 0 () |
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 12.2 | |||
| Prey (2017) | 21.5 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 41.4 | 25.6 | 16.3 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 32.8 | |||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 12.1 | |||
| F1 2017 (2017) | 18 | 13 | 10 | |
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 15 | 6.2 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 42.6 | 19.4 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 8 | |||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 6 | |||
| ELEX (2017) | 6 | |||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 10 |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND | HP 17-y044ng Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), A10-9600P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0 | HP 17-x066ng HD Graphics 520, 6006U, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 0% | -3% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 31.1 | 30.6 2% | 30 4% | 30.2 3% | 30.6 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.1 | 31 -0% | 30.5 2% | 32 -3% | 32.7 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 31.1 | 31 -0% | 30.5 2% | 32 -3% | 32.7 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.1 | 31 -0% | 30.5 2% | 32 -3% | 32.7 -5% |
| Load Average * | 32.4 | 22.6 30% | 35 -8% | 35.6 -10% | 33 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.1 | 32.2 8% | 35.8 -2% | 34.8 1% | 32.7 7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.1 / 31.1 / 31.1 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.4 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 33.7 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 32.4 / 35.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.1 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND | HP 17-y044ng Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), A10-9600P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0 | HP 17-x066ng HD Graphics 520, 6006U, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -10% | -8% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 31.2 | 29.6 5% | 37.3 -20% | 33.9 -9% | 36.5 -17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 34.6 | 33.4 3% | 37 -7% | 40.1 -16% | 37.2 -8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.2 | 27.1 4% | 28.7 -2% | 27.8 1% | 26 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 29.7 -8% | 30.1 -9% | 30.2 -9% | 27.1 2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.9 / 9.6 / 10.5 Watt |
| Carga |
51.1 / 54.7 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND | HP 17-y044ng Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), A10-9600P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-75JC3T0 | HP 17-x066ng HD Graphics 520, 6006U, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 34% | 18% | 20% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 4.7 4% | 3.8 22% | 4.7 4% | 5.5 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 9.6 | 7.8 19% | 9.6 -0% | 7.7 20% | 9.9 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 8 24% | 10.4 1% | 9 14% | 14.6 -39% |
| Load Average * | 51.1 | 19.7 61% | 35.4 31% | 35.3 31% | 28 45% |
| Load Maximum * | 54.7 | 19.6 64% | 34 38% | 38.3 30% | 24.6 55% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T A9-9420, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), 37 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE E2-9000, Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), 30 Wh | Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 35 Wh | HP 17-y044ng A10-9600P, Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), 41 Wh | HP 17-x066ng 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 41.5 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 163 | 224 37% | 302 85% | 263 61% | 375 130% |
Pro
Contra
Aunque que el Asus VivoBook X751BP se comercializa como un portátil business de 17", no tuvo problemas con el contenido multimedia. Mientras hablamos, el modelo equipado con el procesador de doble núcleo A9-9420 de AMD, 8 GB de memoria RAM DDR4 y una unidad de disco duro espaciosa pero lenta de 1 TB se vende por 489 euros en Europa. Desafortunadamente, la pantalla de 17" solo ofrece resolución HD +. La carcasa está bien hecha con una base sólida y rígida, y su aspecto es bastante discreto gracias a sus superficies negras.
El Asus VivoBook X751BP es un portátil business asequible de 17". Resultó no desarrollar su potencial en lo que respecta al rendimiento bruto, y dadas sus muchas desventajas no es interesante en general.
La impresión que dejó el X751BP fue bastante mixta. Si bien el rendimiento fue suficiente en general, simplemente ya no estaba actualizado. La falta de almacenamiento SSD rápido resultó en mucho tiempo de inactividad innecesario debido a la unidad de disco duro irremediablemente empantanada.También es un misterio para nosotros el por qué el portátil carecía de un panel FHD. Teniendo en cuenta el bajo rendimiento del portátil, el consumo de energía era demasiado alto y, como resultado, la duración de la batería era muy baja. Los dispositivos de entrada reflejan la apariencia del dispositivo.Tuvieron un rendimiento inferior y con su respuesta y el ruido al escribir el teclado, el portátil se sentía muy barato.Los escritores prolíficos no disfrutarán con su uso.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T
- 10/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
