Breve análisis del portátil Dell Latitude 5280 (7200U, HD)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5289 |
|
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 251.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 336:1 (Negro: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.34% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
Dell Latitude 5280 TN LED, 12.5", 1366x768 | Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, IPS LED, 12.5", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Innolux N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 12.5", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 725 G4 AU Optronics, IPS, 12.5", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 BOE05F4, TN, 12.5", 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 9% | 12% | 24% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.34 | 42.79 9% | 44.6 13% 44.6 13% | 49.16 25% | 39.06 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.2 | 64.3 9% | 65.9 11% 65.9 11% | 72.3 22% | 58.7 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.67 | 44.21 9% | 46.11 13% 46.11 13% | 50.8 25% | 40.36 -1% |
Response Times | -17% | -14% | -8% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 42 ? -0% | 40.8 ? 3% | 47 ? -12% | 45.2 ? -8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23.2 ? | 31 ? -34% | 30.4 ? -31% | 24 ? -3% | 24 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | 531 ? | 26040 ? | 1000 ? | ||
Screen | 55% | 49% | 81% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 251.8 | 336 33% | 283 12% | 329 31% | 161 -36% |
Brightness | 246 | 320 30% | 281 14% | 310 26% | 152 -38% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 90 0% | 94 4% | 88 -2% | 90 0% |
Black Level * | 0.75 | 0.34 55% | 0.25 67% | 0.19 75% | 0.29 61% |
Contrast | 336 | 988 194% | 1132 237% | 1732 415% | 555 65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.3 | 3.45 69% | 6.1 46% | 2.69 76% | 10.31 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.1 | 7.95 66% | 15.4 33% | 4.47 81% | 18.58 20% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.2 | 1.68 87% | 6 55% | 4.23 68% | 11.3 14% |
Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.49 88% | 2.05 107% | 2.21 100% | 2.57 86% |
CCT | 14912 44% | 6782 96% | 6832 95% | 6011 108% | 13574 48% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.6 | 41 9% | 42.26 12% | 46 22% | 37.32 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.2 | 64 8% | 65.43 11% | 72 22% | 58.82 -1% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 16% /
36% | 16% /
30% | 32% /
58% | 1% /
5% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
23.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17.2 ms subida | |
↘ 6 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21.2 ms subida | |
↘ 20.8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 7280 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Dell Latitude E7470 N001LE747014EMEA | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Dell Latitude 7280 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Dell Latitude E7470 N001LE747014EMEA | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 7280 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Dell Latitude 7280 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Dell Latitude E7470 N001LE747014EMEA | |
Dell Latitude 7280 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Latitude 5289 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3409 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3928 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4365 puntos | |
ayuda |
Dell Latitude 5280 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP EliteBook 725 G4 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 9086% | 18752% | 6641% | -1% | |
Read Seq | 107.5 | 423.7 294% | 1190 1007% | 1963 1726% | 113.8 6% |
Write Seq | 95.3 | 406.4 326% | 985 934% | 1409 1378% | 108.5 14% |
Read 512 | 31.13 | 260.8 738% | 858 2656% | 949 2949% | 24.9 -20% |
Write 512 | 45.49 | 255.6 462% | 528 1061% | 890 1856% | 51.9 14% |
Read 4k | 0.357 | 22.73 6267% | 35.27 9780% | 29.75 8233% | 0.398 11% |
Write 4k | 0.827 | 27.92 3276% | 124.5 14954% | 47.35 5626% | 0.654 -21% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.737 | 306.2 41447% | 495.3 67105% | 139.7 18855% | 0.798 8% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.795 | 158.8 19875% | 418.3 52516% | 100.2 12504% | 0.636 -20% |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-51-731X | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Dell Latitude 5280 | |
Dell Latitude 5580 | |
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1378 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49846 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5281 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 633 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.9 | 20.9 | 18 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 14 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 32.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 33 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 33.4 / 37 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 27.6 dB(A) |
Dell Latitude 5280 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Dell Latitude 5289 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP EliteBook 725 G4 Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 3% | 4% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 27.6 | 30.5 -11% | 29 -5% | 30.4 -10% | 29.2 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 32.6 | 30.5 6% | 29 11% | 30.4 7% | 32.9 -1% |
Idle Average * | 32.7 | 30.5 7% | 29 11% | 30.4 7% | 32.9 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.7 | 30.5 7% | 30.4 7% | 30.4 7% | 32.9 -1% |
Load Average * | 33.4 | 36 -8% | 34.1 -2% | 31.7 5% | 33.7 -1% |
Load Maximum * | 37 | 34.6 6% | 37.6 -2% | 34.4 7% | 34.9 6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Dell Latitude 5280 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.31 / 0.47 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.7 / 6.9 / 7.1 Watt |
Carga |
28.3 / 30.2 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 5280 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 12.5" | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP EliteBook 725 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15, TN, 1366x768, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | -1% | 0% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.7 | 2.7 53% | 3.5 39% | 4.5 21% | 3.9 32% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 5.1 26% | 5.8 16% | 6.3 9% | 6 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.1 | 7.6 -7% | 7.6 -7% | 8.3 -17% | 6.6 7% |
Load Average * | 28.3 | 33 -17% | 33.2 -17% | 27.6 2% | 28.9 -2% |
Load Maximum * | 30.2 | 29 4% | 40.4 -34% | 34.5 -14% | 41.7 -38% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Dell Latitude 5280 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | HP EliteBook 725 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 49 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 E5270 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 47 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 35% | -21% | -22% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 1112 | 1728 55% | 1023 -8% | 700 -37% | 772 -31% |
WiFi v1.3 | 470 | 708 51% | 324 -31% | 380 -19% | 398 -15% |
Load | 138 | 136 -1% | 104 -25% | 123 -11% | 128 -7% |
Pro
Contra
El gancho comercial de muchos portátiles de negocios es la posibilidad de conectar fácilmente bases de expansión o módulos de batería secundarios. Ahora que la gama Latitude 5280/5480/5580 ha prescindido del puerto E-Port, el Thunderbolt 3 se ha vuelto más importante para proporcionar características adicionales. Desafortunadamente el Latitude 5280 carece de ambos y por tanto es menos versátil que el 5480 y el 5580 a pesar de ser más pequeño y más transportable. Además el ventilador del sistema no deja de funcionar en ningún momento, lo que nos parece innecesario para un portátil que incluye un procesador de la gama U.
Si las desventajas anteriores no son decisivas, el 5280 destaca en todos los demás aspectos. Su puerto USB Type-C permite conectar monitores exteriores DisplayPort, y el nuevo chasis es mucho más ligero que el E5270 sin ser más frágil. La duración de batería resulta excelente y mantener las salidas VGA y HDMI resulta útil en entornos académicos y profesionales. El rendimiento de la CPU es muy destacable y el procesador mantiene la velocidad máxima con Turbo Boost en todo momento.
Recomendamos evitar la mediocre pantalla 768p y optar por la opción 1080p que resulta más brillante y seleccionar también disco duro SSD. El aumento en resolución y brillo hace que el portátil sea mas cómodo de usar y merecen realmente la pena si el sistema se va a usar sin monitor externo.
Puede llevar algo de tiempo acostumbrarse al teclado debido a su tacto esponjoso, y los usuarios con manos grandes quizá deberían optar por evitar este tamaño si van a teclear con frecuencia. El 5280 es más adecuado para usuarios que requieran movilidad en lugar de hacer uso del portátil en casa o en la oficina.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Dell Latitude 5280
- 05/27/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo