Breve análisis del portátil Dell XPS 13 (i7-8550U, QHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 386.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1170:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, IGZO IPS, 13.3", 3200x1800 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 13.3", 2160x1440 | Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 AUO B133HAN04.2, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02), , 12.5", 2560x1440 | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Sharp SHP144A, IPS, 13.3", 3200x1800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 3% | -1% | 6% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.6 | 63.4 0% | 65.8 3% | 64 1% | 68.7 8% | 62.8 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93 | 88.6 -5% | 96.2 3% | 90 -3% | 95.8 3% | 89.4 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.4 | 64 -2% | 66.8 2% | 64.9 -1% | 69.9 7% | 64.6 -1% |
| Response Times | -47% | 10% | -16% | -42% | -15% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.6 ? | 41.6 ? -17% | 33 ? 7% | 44 ? -24% | 37 ? -4% | 43.6 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 34 ? -25% | 24 ? 12% | 29 ? -7% | 33.4 ? -23% | 29.2 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 19690 ? | 210.1 ? -99% | 200 ? -99% | |||
| Screen | 4% | 17% | 7% | 1% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 386.1 | 510.7 32% | 408 6% | 334 -13% | 402 4% | 396.2 3% |
| Brightness | 357 | 481 35% | 395 11% | 321 -10% | 382 7% | 357 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 90 8% | 88 6% | 86 4% | 88 6% | 84 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.66 -100% | 0.45 -36% | 0.25 24% | 0.45 -36% | 0.266 19% |
| Contrast | 1170 | 774 -34% | 907 -22% | 1336 14% | 893 -24% | 1489 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.4 43% | 1.55 63% | 4.24 -1% | 3.6 14% | 3.9 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.6 | 7.3 4% | 2.19 71% | 6.03 21% | 7.5 1% | 7.58 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 2.4 58% | 1.91 66% | 3.92 31% | 4.3 25% | 4.16 27% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.34 94% | 2.68 82% | 2.1 105% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7336 89% | 6747 96% | 6491 100% | 6758 96% | 6572 99% | 6514 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 57 -3% | 61 3% | 58 -2% | 62.3 6% | 57.5 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.2 | 88.1 -4% | 96 4% | 90 -2% | 95.7 4% | 88.7 -4% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -15% /
-7% | 10% /
13% | -3% /
2% | -12% /
-6% | -3% /
3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 11.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 66 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 35.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 45 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 19690 Hz | ≤ 100 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 19690 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 100 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 19690 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell XPS 13-9343 Non-Touch | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360-4764 | |
| Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U | |
| MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3432 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4604 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4436 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 23% | 52% | 16% | 86% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 285.3 | 457.8 60% | 726 154% | 390 37% | 618 117% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 172 | 264.7 54% | 263.8 53% | 188 9% | 333.8 94% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 329.7 | 714 117% | 950 188% | 283.3 -14% | 830 152% |
| Score Total | 1284 | 1388 8% | 1495 16% | 1607 25% | 1992 55% |
| Score Write | 452 | 389 -14% | 375 -17% | 327 -28% | 606 34% |
| Score Read | 580 | 681 17% | 752 30% | 870 50% | 911 57% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.051 | 0.041 20% | 0.037 27% | 0.035 31% | 0.031 39% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.102 | 0.169 -66% | 0.045 56% | 0.055 46% | 0.048 53% |
| 4K-64 Write | 325.1 | 249.4 -23% | 204.7 -37% | 197.7 -39% | 363.4 12% |
| 4K-64 Read | 423.6 | 512 21% | 586 38% | 723 71% | 722 70% |
| 4K Write | 101.7 | 85.8 -16% | 96.9 -5% | 92 -10% | 107.4 6% |
| 4K Read | 28.17 | 34.77 23% | 37.69 34% | 29.52 5% | 46.9 66% |
| Seq Write | 249.2 | 543 118% | 735 195% | 372.8 50% | 1348 441% |
| Seq Read | 1277 | 1342 5% | 1283 0% | 1179 -8% | 1413 11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2032 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 67042 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8459 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1071 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 490 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 72.8 | 37.6 | 31.1 | 10 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 24.9 | 14.6 | 7.4 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 49.6 | 30.7 | 14.9 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 27.9 / 27.9 / 27.9 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 30.8 / 33.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 27.9 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Huawei MateBook X HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256 | Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -8% | -8% | -3% | ||
| off / environment * | 27.9 | 28.4 -2% | 30.5 -9% | 29.9 -7% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 27.9 | 28.4 -2% | 30.5 -9% | 29.9 -7% | 28.9 -4% | |
| Idle Average * | 27.9 | 28.4 -2% | 30.5 -9% | 29.9 -7% | 28.9 -4% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.9 | 28.4 -2% | 30.5 -9% | 30.3 -9% | 28.9 -4% | |
| Load Average * | 30.8 | 33.2 -8% | 34.2 -11% | 33.9 -10% | 30.9 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 33.1 | 35.2 -6% | 32.5 2% | 34.9 -5% | 33.5 -1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.24 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 5.8 / 6 Watt |
| Carga |
42.5 / 41.4 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002, a-Si TFT-LCD, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris i7-7560U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | 14% | 7% | -5% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3.8 7% | 2.6 37% | 3.32 19% | 6.4 -56% | 3.6 12% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 11 -90% | 5.3 9% | 5.27 9% | 6.6 -14% | 6.4 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6 | 11.3 -88% | 8.5 -42% | 6.32 -5% | 6.8 -13% | 9.2 -53% |
| Load Average * | 42.5 | 35.6 16% | 29 32% | 32 25% | 27.5 35% | 34 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.4 | 37.2 10% | 27 35% | 45.9 -11% | 32.4 22% | 34.4 17% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris i7-7560U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -49% | -28% | -10% | 19% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1108 | 695 -37% | 512 -54% | 937 -15% | 1521 37% | 1295 17% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 589 | 279 -53% | 337 -43% | 483 -18% | 655 11% | 677 15% |
| Load | 143 | 60 -58% | 162 13% | 147 3% | 154 8% | 157 10% |
Pro
Contra
La intención principal de Dell con el Kaby Lake-R XPS 13 de octava generación era aumentar el rendimiento de la CPU a través de un mejor control de la temperatura. Por lo tanto, esta última iteración fue diseñada para funcionar a temperaturas de núcleo más altas que las SKU anteriores sin afectar negativamente la experiencia del usuario o elevar las temperaturas de la superficie a niveles incómodos. Nuestras pruebas reflejan más o menos estas afirmaciones, ya que las temperaturas centrales pueden sobrepasar los 90 ° C cuando están sometidas a una carga pesada sin afectar la necesidad de aumentar las velocidades máximas del ventilador. Las temperaturas de la superficie serán ligeramente más cálidas en ciertas partes del teclado, pero los reposamanos y el trackpad nunca se resultan incómodos.
Aparte del significativo salto en el rendimiento de la CPU y la menor mejora en el rendimiento de la GPU, no hay sorpresas para esta generación de XPS 13. Los mismos pros y contras de nuestras críticas anteriores. Hay un caso para el cual comprar la XPS 13 i7-7560U SKU en lugar de la SKU i7-8550U ya que los gráficos de Iris son un 18 por ciento más rápido que en la gráfica UHD 620, pero el rendimiento de la CPU es mucho más lento en un 40 por ciento. Las aplicaciones exigentes que se aprovechan del recuento de núcleos más alto amarán absolutamente a Kaby Lake-R y al nuevo XPS 13. Todavía hay margen de mejora ya que la velocidad de reloj constante de 2,5 GHz está muy lejos de los 3.7 GHz. Por lo tanto, será interesante ver cómo otros Ultrabooks que se divierten esta misma CPU se llevará a cabo en las próximas semanas.
El XPS 13 es una vez más un competidor muy fuerte en el espacio del subportátiles para esta temporada de vacaciones. El impulso de rendimiento es tal como se anunciaba a pesar de que esperábamos una mejor sostenibilidad de Turbo Boost durante periodos más largos.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
- 10/12/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
