Breve análisis del portátil Fujitsu Lifebook E746 (i5-6200U, HD520)
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14-bs007ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 1032:1 (Negro: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.31 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 LG Philips LGD046D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14-bs007ng AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -31% | -32% | -29% | -39% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.1 | 41.04 -36% | 40.55 -37% | 42.21 -34% | 36.53 -43% |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.9 | 61.2 -27% | 61 -27% | 62.7 -25% | 54.9 -35% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.3 | 42.47 -31% | 41.89 -32% | 43.71 -29% | 37.74 -38% |
| Response Times | -4% | -9% | -38% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 39 ? -15% | 38 ? -12% | 50.4 ? -48% | 39 ? -15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 26.8 ? -12% | 30.8 ? -28% | 27 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 25000 ? 19% | 20410 ? -3% | ||
| Screen | -32% | -42% | -40% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 320 | 271 -15% | 283.9 -11% | 274 -14% | 251 -22% |
| Brightness | 315 | 256 -19% | 261 -17% | 256 -19% | 229 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 85 -1% | 85 -1% | 85 -1% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.43 -39% | 0.25 19% | 0.35 -13% | 0.15 52% |
| Contrast | 1032 | 630 -39% | 1136 10% | 783 -24% | 1673 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.44 | 5.03 -46% | 6.4 -86% | 6.1 -77% | 4.67 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.39 | 11.9 -27% | 18.7 -99% | 13.8 -47% | 9.4 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.31 | 4.02 -74% | 6.3 -173% | 5.7 -147% | 3.09 -34% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.31 95% | 2.39 92% | 2.11 104% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6496 100% | 6659 98% | 6511 100% | 6419 101% | 7050 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 39 -29% | 38 -31% | 40.2 -27% | 35 -36% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 61 -27% | 60 -29% | 62.4 -26% | 55 -35% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -22% /
-26% | -28% /
-34% | -36% /
-37% | -20% /
-15% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 42 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 21000 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 21000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 21000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8710 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3133 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4288 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | HP 14-bs007ng SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006 | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 80% | 7% | -3% | 6% | |
| Read Seq | 490.6 | 1086 121% | 495.2 1% | 456.1 -7% | 510 4% |
| Write Seq | 264.8 | 581 119% | 485.7 83% | 457.3 73% | 267.2 1% |
| Read 512 | 411.6 | 869 111% | 323.4 -21% | 347 -16% | 347.6 -16% |
| Write 512 | 262.3 | 584 123% | 291.5 11% | 277.3 6% | 267.5 2% |
| Read 4k | 24.86 | 35.89 44% | 34.2 38% | 28.47 15% | 33.12 33% |
| Write 4k | 110.1 | 122.4 11% | 74.3 -33% | 55.4 -50% | 95.9 -13% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 383.4 | 462.9 21% | 321.3 -16% | 304.3 -21% | 392.8 2% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 198.7 | 370.9 87% | 188 -5% | 158.2 -20% | 266.4 34% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1359 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5202 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 668 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.9 | 23.02 | 18.87 | 5.88 |
| Thief (2014) | 17.7 | 10.4 | 8.9 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 33.5 / 33.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.9 / 9.6 Watt |
| Carga |
30.4 / 28.2 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14-bs007ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | 4% | 7% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 4.5 -15% | 5.2 -33% | 2.6 33% | 3.1 21% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 7.1 10% | 6.9 13% | 6.3 20% | 5.5 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 10.2 -6% | 7 27% | 7 27% | 6 37% |
| Load Average * | 30.4 | 29.8 2% | 24.6 19% | 29.1 4% | 29 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.2 | 31 -10% | 30.1 -7% | 42.3 -50% | 33.7 -20% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Fujitsu Lifebook E746 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 63 Wh | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP 14-bs007ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -10% | -6% | 25% | 49% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1181 | 976 -17% | 876 -26% | 1398 18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 283 | 341 20% | 357 26% | 480 70% | 423 49% |
| Load | 152 | 104 -32% | 126 -17% | 130 -14% |
Pro
Contra
El Lifebook E746 es un sólido portátil business. Ofrece a los compradores una amplia gama de puertos y muchas opciones de expansión. Sin embargo, las configuraciones disponibles van un poco rezagadas con respecto a los desarrollos técnicos más recientes, ya que Fujitsu no ofrece ningún procesador reciente.
Fujitsu ofrece a los compradores un portátil business caro pero muy adaptable - el Lifebook E746.
La relación precio-rendimiento es otro punto en contra del Lifebook E746. Muchos fabricantes ofrecen dispositivos con mejor hardware y una gama similar de puertos a un precio significativamente más bajo.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Fujitsu Lifebook E746
- 11/13/2017 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
