Breve análisis del portátil Gigabyte P55W v7
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG P507 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte P55W v6 LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 3% | 2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 64.5 2% | 65.6 3% | 64.5 2% | 63.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82 | 83.4 2% | 84.3 3% | 83.4 2% | 80.6 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 59.9 | 60.9 2% | 61.7 3% | 61 2% | 59 -2% |
| Response Times | -4% | -3% | 6% | -38% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 40 ? -8% | 36.8 ? 1% | 36 ? 3% | 56 ? -51% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 25 ? -0% | 26.4 ? -6% | 23 ? 8% | 31 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 3% | 16% | -1% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 287 | 321 12% | 302 5% | 288 0% | 280 -2% |
| Brightness | 289 | 296 2% | 303 5% | 292 1% | 294 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 87 0% | 87 0% | 82 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.169 42% | 0.3 -3% | 0.46 -59% |
| Contrast | 990 | 973 -2% | 1787 81% | 960 -3% | 609 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.92 | 4.42 10% | 4.61 6% | 5.1 -4% | 4.48 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11 | 9.78 11% | 9.98 9% | 9.44 14% | 10.16 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.66 | 3.34 9% | 3.32 9% | 4.43 -21% | 2.69 27% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.46 89% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6482 100% | 6213 105% | 6358 102% | 6687 97% | 6455 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 55 2% | 55.4 3% | 55 2% | 53 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 83 1% | 84.4 3% | 83 1% | 80 -2% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 0% /
2% | 5% /
11% | 2% /
0% | -15% /
-9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 37 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4013 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5317 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256 | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG P507 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte P55W v6 Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 249% | 227% | -6% | |
| Read Seq | 466.2 | 462.5 -1% | 1696 264% | 1857 298% | 511 10% |
| Write Seq | 261.9 | 462.7 77% | 1584 505% | 1240 373% | 161.1 -38% |
| Read 512 | 252.5 | 335 33% | 1044 313% | 971 285% | 338 34% |
| Write 512 | 254.8 | 407.1 60% | 1562 513% | 1239 386% | 160.8 -37% |
| Read 4k | 25.4 | 25.61 1% | 50.8 100% | 54.1 113% | 26.2 3% |
| Write 4k | 55 | 86.3 57% | 139.2 153% | 167.4 204% | 76.7 39% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 358.5 | 246.7 -31% | 591 65% | 695 94% | 264.7 -26% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 240.1 | 301.5 26% | 422.8 76% | 386.8 61% | 160.3 -33% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11778 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21839 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9669 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 70.4 | 38.4 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 72.6 | 61.8 | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 77.6 | 73.6 | ||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 80.2 | 60.2 | 46.5 | |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 98.5 | 83 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 35 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 37 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 39 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.2 °C / -29.2 F).
Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG P507 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8 / 13 / 18 Watt |
| Carga |
76 / 143 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -35% | -97% | -21% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 16 -100% | 25.4 -218% | 11 -38% | 8 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 19 -46% | 30.3 -133% | 16 -23% | 13 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 18 | 23 -28% | 31.5 -75% | 21 -17% | 17 6% |
| Load Average * | 76 | 68 11% | 111.8 -47% | 80 -5% | 71 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 143 | 157 -10% | 163.2 -14% | 174 -22% | 165 -15% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -36% | -73% | -14% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 789 | 315 -60% | 137 -83% | 409 -48% | 610 -23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 346 | 220 -36% | 101 -71% | 274 -21% | 352 2% |
| Load | 98 | 87 -11% | 35 -64% | 123 26% | 95 -3% |
| H.264 | 235 | 338 |
Pro
Contra
Gigabyte ha recortado en los lugares adecuados y nos ofrece un portátil para juegos más que aceptable. La carencia de algunas características como el puerto Thunderbolt 3 o G-Sync hace posible ahorrar unos pocos cientos de Euros sin comprometer el rendimiento.
Considerando el bajo precio, nos han gustado los dispositivos de entrada y, con algunas puntualizaciones, el panel IPS. Ocurre lo mismo con la sólida carcasa de plástico con su base fácilmente extraíble. La situación de los puertos, la lenta respuesta de la pantalla y el SSD no son puntos tan favorables. Los ruidos que se escuchan cuando el sistema está bajo carga intensa son el punto débil del P55W v7. Sin embargo, no es algo realmente importante, por tanto el portátil obtiene una clara recomendación de compra.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Gigabyte P55W v7
- 02/28/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
