Breve análisis del portátil Gigabyte P55W v7

Name: Gigabyte P55W v7
Brand: Gigabyte

v7 por excelencia. La nueva máquina para juegos de Gigabyte está enfocado a jugones que busquen el mejor ratio potencia/precio y a los que no importe hacer alguna concesión para conseguirlo. Comparado con su predecesor, el P55W v7 proporciona mayor rendimiento y un sistema de refrigeración más silencioso y eficaz.

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traducido por Fernando Alvarez Ude), Published 03/05/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Dispositivo de pruebas cortesía de Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P55W v7 (P55 Serie)

Procesador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Adaptador gráfico

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.49, Nvidia Optimus

Memoría

16 GB

, SO-DIMM DDR4, 2400 MHz, single-channel, 1 of 2 memory banks filled, max. 32 GB

pantalla

15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full HD, lustroso: no

Placa base

Intel HM175

Disco duro

Liteonit CV3-8D256, 256 GB

, SATA-3-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 (optional PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5 inch

Tarjeta de sonido

Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Conexiones

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: headphone (audio out) + microphone (audio in), both 3.5-mm jacks, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Equipamento de red

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Unidad óptica

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Tamaño

Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 34 x 380 x 269

Battería

63 Wh Litio-Polimero, 6 cells

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionales

Altavoces: stereo, 2 x 2 watts, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 180-watt power supply, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office 365 trial, diverse manufacturer tools, 24 Meses Garantía

Peso

2.628 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 646 g

Precio

1700 EUR

Enlaces

Gigabyte Pagina de inicio

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

todas las especificaciónes

Size Comparison

Gigabyte P55W v7 Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Gigabyte P55W v6 MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US SCHENKER XMG P507 DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0

Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P507	77 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7	76 MB/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T	75 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte P55W v6	73 MB/s -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US	23.4 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P55W v7	88 MB/s
Gigabyte P55W v6	87 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG P507	86 MB/s -2%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T	85 MB/s -3%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US	23.5 MB/s -73%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s +8%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	492 MBit/s +5%
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	470 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	677 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	663 MBit/s
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	660 MBit/s 0%


270 cd/m²	271 cd/m²	283 cd/m²
280 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	299 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	309 cd/m²

Temperatura del cuarto

LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 288.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 990:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download Archivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG P507 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte P55W v6 LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		2%	3%	2%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	63.5	64.5 2%	65.6 3%	64.5 2%	63.2 0%
sRGB Coverage	82	83.4 2%	84.3 3%	83.4 2%	80.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	59.9	60.9 2%	61.7 3%	61 2%	59 -2%
Response Times		-4%	-3%	6%	-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(15, 22)	40 ?(15, 25) -8%	36.8 ?(16.4, 20.4) 1%	36 ?(12, 24) 3%	56 ?(23, 33) -51%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(5, 20)	25 ?(5, 20) -0%	26.4 ?(5.2, 21.2) -6%	23 ?(5, 18) 8%	31 ?(8, 23) -24%
PWM Frequency
Screen		3%	16%	-1%	-6%
Brightness middle	287	321 12%	302 5%	288 0%	280 -2%
Brightness	289	296 2%	303 5%	292 1%	294 2%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	87 0%	87 0%	82 -6%
Black Level *	0.29	0.33 -14%	0.169 42%	0.3 -3%	0.46 -59%
Contrast	990	973 -2%	1787 81%	960 -3%	609 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.92	4.42 10%	4.61 6%	5.1 -4%	4.48 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11	9.78 11%	9.98 9%	9.44 14%	10.16 8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.66	3.34 9%	3.32 9%	4.43 -21%	2.69 27%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.46 ^89%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6482 ^100%	6213 ^105%	6358 ^102%	6687 ^97%	6455 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	55 2%	55.4 3%	55 2%	53 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82	83 1%	84.4 3%	83 1%	80 -2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)		0% / 2%	5% / 11%	2% / 0%	-15% / -9%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

ℹ

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.

↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 5 ms subida
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 20 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
37 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↗ 15 ms subida
37 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada	↘ 22 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	143 Points -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	138 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	682 Points -7%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points -7%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	658 Points -10%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

156 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

733 Points

ayuda

... comparado con

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4741 Points +18%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4059 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	4014 Points 0%
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	4013 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	5317 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	5109 Points -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5046 Points -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	4784 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4013 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5317 puntos
ayuda

	Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	SCHENKER XMG P507 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Gigabyte P55W v6 Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		28%	249%	227%	-6%
Read Seq	466.2	462.5 -1%	1696 264%	1857 298%	511 10%
Write Seq	261.9	462.7 77%	1584 505%	1240 373%	161.1 -38%
Read 512	252.5	335 33%	1044 313%	971 285%	338 34%
Write 512	254.8	407.1 60%	1562 513%	1239 386%	160.8 -37%
Read 4k	25.4	25.61 1%	50.8 100%	54.1 113%	26.2 3%
Write 4k	55	86.3 57%	139.2 153%	167.4 204%	76.7 39%
Read 4k QD32	358.5	246.7 -31%	591 65%	695 94%	264.7 -26%
Write 4k QD32	240.1	301.5 26%	422.8 76%	386.8 61%	160.3 -33%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Liteonit CV3-8D256

Sequential Read: 466.2 MB/s

Sequential Write: 261.9 MB/s

512K Read: 252.5 MB/s

512K Write: 254.8 MB/s

4K Read: 25.4 MB/s

4K Write: 55 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 358.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 240.1 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11872 Points +4%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11622 Points +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11426 Points
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11422 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11045 Points -3%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15466 Points +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15387 Points +5%
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14792 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14693 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14222 Points -3%

3DMark 11 Performance		11778 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21839 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9669 puntos
ayuda

... comparado con

	medio	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)		70.4	38.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		72.6	61.8
Battlefield 1 (2016)		77.6	73.6
Dishonored 2 (2016)	80.2	60.2	46.5
Resident Evil 7 (2017)		98.5	83

Ruido

Ocioso		33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD		34 dB(A)
DVD		37 / dB(A)
Carga		39 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Carga Máx.

Inactivo


49.6 °C	43.6 °C	31.1 °C
49 °C	45.4 °C	31.8 °C
45.1 °C	44.3 °C	28.3 °C

Máximo: 49.6 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C


26.3 °C	38.7 °C	47.7 °C
29.7 °C	44.7 °C	47.1 °C
28.5 °C	44.5 °C	46.3 °C

Máximo: 47.7 °C
Médio: 39.3 °C

Conector de corriente 40.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.2 °C / -29.2 F).

Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG P507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	8 / 13 / 18 Watt
Carga	76 / 143 Watt


Clave: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Power Consumption		-35%	-97%	-21%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	8	16 -100%	25.4 -218%	11 -38%	8 -0%
Idle Average *	13	19 -46%	30.3 -133%	16 -23%	13 -0%
Idle Maximum *	18	23 -28%	31.5 -75%	21 -17%	17 6%
Load Average *	76	68 11%	111.8 -47%	80 -5%	71 7%
Load Maximum *	143	157 -10%	163.2 -14%	174 -22%	165 -15%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería

Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)		13h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 46min
Carga (máximo brillo)		1h 38min

	Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh	Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh
Duración de Batería		-36%	-73%	-14%	-8%
Reader / Idle	789	315 -60%	137 -83%	409 -48%	610 -23%
WiFi v1.3	346	220 -36%	101 -71%	274 -21%	352 2%
Load	98	87 -11%	35 -64%	123 26%	95 -3%
H.264		235			338

Pro

+ impeccably built, solid-looking casing

+ relatively long battery life

+ a lot of (gaming) bang for the buck

+ good input devices

+ USB 3.1 Gen.2 Type-C

+ IPS panel

+ no PWM

Contra

- occasional fan whistling/coil whining at higher speeds

- plastic casing with sensitive surfaces

- unfavorable interface positioning

- comparatively slow SSD

- response times not ideal

- no Thunderbolt 3

Gigabyte P55W v7. Modelo de prueba cedido por Gigabyte Alemania.

Gigabyte ha recortado en los lugares adecuados y nos ofrece un portátil para juegos más que aceptable. La carencia de algunas características como el puerto Thunderbolt 3 o G-Sync hace posible ahorrar unos pocos cientos de Euros sin comprometer el rendimiento.

Considerando el bajo precio, nos han gustado los dispositivos de entrada y, con algunas puntualizaciones, el panel IPS. Ocurre lo mismo con la sólida carcasa de plástico con su base fácilmente extraíble. La situación de los puertos, la lenta respuesta de la pantalla y el SSD no son puntos tan favorables. Los ruidos que se escuchan cuando el sistema está bajo carga intensa son el punto débil del P55W v7. Sin embargo, no es algo realmente importante, por tanto el portátil obtiene una clara recomendación de compra.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Gigabyte P55W v7 - 02/28/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabado

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

81%

Ratón

78%

Conectividad

60 / 81 → 74%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 87%