Breve análisis del portátil HP 14-bs007ng (i5-7200U, FHD)
Port Selection
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14-bs007ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| HP 14-bs007ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 251 cd/m²
Contraste: 1673:1 (Negro: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.09 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| HP 14-bs007ng IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 14% | 12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 36.53 | 41.65 14% | 40.96 12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 54.9 | 61.8 13% | 61.4 12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.74 | 43.03 14% | 42.34 12% |
| Response Times | -12% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 42 ? -8% | 43 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 31 ? -15% | 28 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 352 ? | 200 ? | |
| Screen | -17% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle | 251 | 274 9% | 281 12% |
| Brightness | 229 | 253 10% | 259 13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 81 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.15 | 0.31 -107% | 0.45 -200% |
| Contrast | 1673 | 884 -47% | 624 -63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.67 | 5.74 -23% | 4.19 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.4 | 8.26 12% | 10.64 -13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.09 | 4.61 -49% | 2.55 17% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7050 92% | 7281 89% | 6555 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 39 11% | 39 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55 | 61 11% | 61 11% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -5% /
-10% | -5% /
-12% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP 14-bs007ng (Edge 41) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE (Edge 40) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 (Edge 40) | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3542 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| HP 14-bs007ng SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006 | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 26% | 72% | |
| Read Seq | 456.1 | 991 117% | 1137 149% |
| Write Seq | 457.3 | 792 73% | 606 33% |
| Read 512 | 347 | 482.2 39% | 800 131% |
| Write 512 | 277.3 | 138.5 -50% | 564 103% |
| Read 4k | 28.47 | 28.11 -1% | 31.6 11% |
| Write 4k | 55.4 | 79 43% | 108.3 95% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 304.3 | 320.9 5% | 290.1 -5% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 158.2 | 124.8 -21% | 251 59% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1548 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.2 | 24.5 | 20.5 | 6.9 |
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 51.3 | 29 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 16 | 8 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 9.9 | 5.4 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 11 | 5.3 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 12.6 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 32 / 32.4 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 35.7 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 37 / 39.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
HP 14-bs007ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.45 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.1 / 5.5 / 6 Watt |
| Carga |
29 / 33.7 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| HP 14-bs007ng | |
Pro
Contra
El 14" de HP está equipado con suficiente potencia para las tareas de oficina y las aplicaciones. Está entre los muy pocos portátiles que quedan con su factor de forma, que siguen llevando un quemador de DVD.
El portátil puede funcionar entre silencioso e inaudible, si la opción de "ventilador siempre encendido" no está seleccionada en la BIOS. El HP 14 apenas se recalienta. Un SSD ayuda a acelerar la experiencia completa del usuario y es posible reemplazarla más adelante.
El HP 14 es una máquina portátil restringida a oficina y navegación por Internet.
El teclado deja una buena impresión y es muy adecuado para los que les encanta escribir. Consideramos que la falta de retroiluminación es decepcionante teniendo en cuenta el PVR. El aguante de la batería es bueno.
La pantalla IPS mate es una alegría para mirar en interiores. El contraste es muy bueno y los ángulos de visión son estables. El brillo máximo es bastante tenue y hace que sea muy difícil ver el contenido de la pantalla al aire libre durante el día. Una computadora portátil con un PVR de ~ $820 debería ofrecer una pantalla más brillante. En Alemania, el HP 14 solo viene con una garantía de un año, lo cual también es decepcionante.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP 14-bs007ng
- 11/01/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
