Brevé análisis del portátil HP 15-ay116ng
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA (jseb) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (jseb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA (jseb) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (jseb) |
|
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 241 cd/m²
Contraste: 566:1 (Negro: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13.13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.34% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
HP 15-ay116ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15-3570 TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 9% | 0% | 9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.34 | 36.51 -2% | 40.71 9% | 37.24 0% | 40.61 9% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.2 | 55 -2% | 61.1 9% | 56 0% | 61.1 9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.58 | 37.72 -2% | 42.07 9% | 38.48 0% | 41.96 9% |
Response Times | 2% | -33% | -31% | -27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 40 ? -0% | 52 ? -30% | 58 ? -45% | 37 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 22 ? 4% | 31 ? -35% | 27 ? -17% | 37 ? -61% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 | ||||
Screen | -4% | -0% | -7% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 249 | 219 -12% | 211 -15% | 204 -18% | 202 -19% |
Brightness | 234 | 222 -5% | 200 -15% | 198 -15% | 211 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 83 -7% | 85 -4% | 88 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.39 11% | 0.43 2% | 0.48 -9% | 0.62 -41% |
Contrast | 566 | 562 -1% | 491 -13% | 425 -25% | 326 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.71 | 12.67 -8% | 10.53 10% | 11.62 1% | 12.35 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.51 | 20.99 -8% | 17.79 9% | 19.97 -2% | 19.9 -2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.13 | 13.82 -5% | 11.85 10% | 12.3 6% | 13.46 -3% |
Gamma | 2.57 86% | 2.63 84% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 15273 43% | 15633 42% | 13758 47% | 13244 49% | 15217 43% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 35 -3% | 39 8% | 36 0% | 39 8% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 55 -2% | 61 9% | 56 0% | 61 9% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -1% /
-3% | -8% /
-3% | -13% /
-9% | -10% /
-9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida | |
↘ 16 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 47 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms). | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida | |
↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 57 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
HP 15-ay116ng |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 7 Score | 4977 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3315 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4338 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4587 puntos | |
ayuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
HP 15-ay116ng Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -21% | -92% | -92% | -56% | |
Read Seq | 501 | 509 2% | 104.7 -79% | 102.5 -80% | 453.2 -10% |
Write Seq | 483.9 | 322.1 -33% | 95.7 -80% | 90.7 -81% | 137.7 -72% |
Read 512 | 413.8 | 321.2 -22% | 33 -92% | 32.58 -92% | 308.5 -25% |
Write 512 | 294.9 | 289.4 -2% | 38.3 -87% | 35.65 -88% | 134.1 -55% |
Read 4k | 34.91 | 20.99 -40% | 0.375 -99% | 0.426 -99% | 19.06 -45% |
Write 4k | 95.7 | 88 -8% | 0.782 -99% | 0.64 -99% | 21.31 -78% |
Read 4k QD32 | 370.9 | 141.3 -62% | 0.675 -100% | 0.987 -100% | 93.5 -75% |
Write 4k QD32 | 243.6 | 228.5 -6% | 0.769 -100% | 0.645 -100% | 23.3 -90% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8012 puntos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1511 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49743 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5542 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 744 puntos | |
ayuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng | |
HP ProBook 470 G3 | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng | |
HP ProBook 470 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP ProBook 470 G3 | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 67.6 | 33.9 | 19.5 | 9.6 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 45.3 | 25.3 | 20.9 | 6.5 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31.1 | 24.9 | 16.4 | 5 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 38.4 / dB(A) |
Carga |
| 35.6 / 36.15 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -1% | -1% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 30.5 | 31.6 -4% | 31.2 -2% | 31.2 -2% | 31 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 34.5 -10% | 31.5 -1% | 32.5 -4% | 31 1% |
Idle Average * | 31.3 | 34.5 -10% | 31.9 -2% | 32.5 -4% | 31 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 34.5 -10% | 31.9 -2% | 32.7 -4% | 31 1% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 39 -10% | 34.2 4% | 34.2 4% | 34.2 4% |
Load Maximum * | 36.15 | 38.3 -6% | 36.8 -2% | 34.6 4% | 34.3 5% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.2 °C / -7.5 F).
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | -14% | -5% | -27% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 33.8 | 31.1 8% | 33.2 2% | 34.6 -2% | 36.1 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.6 | 31.8 13% | 37.3 -2% | 35.6 3% | 47 -28% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.6 | 22.9 3% | 28.7 -22% | 26.7 -13% | 31.7 -34% |
Idle Bottom * | 23.8 | 22.6 5% | 32 -34% | 26 -9% | 32.9 -38% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
HP 15-ay116ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.35 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.2 / 6.3 / 7.4 Watt |
Carga |
24 / 29 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | -54% | -20% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 3.6 -13% | 5.8 -81% | 5.5 -72% | 4.9 -53% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 6 5% | 12.6 -100% | 7.6 -21% | 7.2 -14% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 6.4 14% | 12.8 -73% | 8.5 -15% | 7.5 -1% |
Load Average * | 24 | 26 -8% | 27.6 -15% | 24.5 -2% | 25.4 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 29 | 28.1 3% | 30 -3% | 25.4 12% | 28 3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -11% | -24% | -28% | 43% | |
Reader / Idle | 869 | 634 -27% | 1024 18% | ||
H.264 | 430 | 313 -27% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 412 | 347 -16% | 315 -24% | 295 -28% | 542 32% |
Load | 87 | 109 25% | 157 80% |
Pro
Contra
El portátil de 15.6 pulgadas de HP deja una impresión global positiva. Gracias al procesador Kaby Lake, el portátil es adecuado para la mayoría de posibles usos -actualmente y en los próximos años. El portátil se mantiene relativamente frío a pesar de la potente CPU. Un rápido SSD mantiene el buen funcionamiento del sistema. Reemplazar el SSD es posible, pero requeriría abrir la carcasa. El teclado instalado es adecuado para su uso doméstico. Puede decirse lo mismo de la duración de la batería. De la pantalla mate nos ha gustado la resolución Full HD, pero es muy oscura y tiene poco contraste. Además, los ángulos de visión no son amplios. Sin embargo, la pantalla es aceptable si se tiene en cuenta el precio del portátil.
Con el 15-ay116ng, HP añade a su catálogo un todoterreno con una muy buena relación precio - rendimiento.
Este portátil cuesta 500 euros. Bastante de los cuales se van al procesador, la pantalla y el SSD. Esto signigica que ha habido que recortar en otros aspectos: el portátil solo tiene un año de garantía. Incluso en el segmento más económico dos años son ya estándar. Además, el portátil solo tiene Fast Ethernet. Si necesitas Ethernet Gigabit, deberás buscar una alternativa. El portátil carece también de un modulo WiFi con soporte para el estándar AC.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP 15-ay116ng
- 11/25/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck