Breve análisis del portátil HP Envy 15 as133cl
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
HP 17-y044ng | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
HP 17-y044ng |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
HP 15-ba077ng |
|
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 262.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1093:1 (Negro: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.95% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
HP Envy 15-as133cl Chi Mei CMN15D8, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP 15-ba077ng BOE, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) BOE0693, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB BOE NT156FHM-N31, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 58% | -7% | -8% | 1% | -11% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42.95 | 68.9 60% | 39.98 -7% | 39.72 -8% | 43.27 1% | 38.07 -11% |
sRGB Coverage | 64.3 | 98.9 54% | 60.2 -6% | 59.2 -8% | 64.9 1% | 57.3 -11% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.41 | 70.9 60% | 41.31 -7% | 41.07 -8% | 44.71 1% | 39.34 -11% |
Response Times | -49% | -21% | 943% | -29% | 17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.4 ? | 54 ? -22% | 42 ? 5% | 42.4 ? 5% | 42 ? 5% | 43 ? 3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 52.4 ? -75% | 22 ? 27% | 14.6 ? 51% | 33.6 ? -12% | 21 ? 30% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 50 ? -95% | 28740 2774% | 198.4 -80% | ||
Screen | 19% | -71% | -54% | -10% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 262.3 | 400 52% | 209 -20% | 224 -15% | 186.5 -29% | 185 -29% |
Brightness | 240 | 392 63% | 200 -17% | 201 -16% | 174 -27% | 184 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 89 7% | 88 6% | 75 -10% | 69 -17% | 95 14% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.26 -8% | 0.56 -133% | 0.46 -92% | 0.18 25% | 0.28 -17% |
Contrast | 1093 | 1538 41% | 373 -66% | 487 -55% | 1036 -5% | 661 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 4.9 2% | 12.21 -144% | 10.5 -110% | 5.7 -14% | 8.07 -61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.6 | 11 47% | 20.66 -0% | 16.8 18% | 22.5 -9% | 14.83 28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 7.2 -125% | 13.48 -321% | 11.23 -251% | 4.4 -38% | 8.83 -176% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.11 104% | 2.34 94% | 2.12 104% | 2.35 94% | 2.47 89% |
CCT | 6817 95% | 6911 94% | 15364 42% | 11096 59% | 6963 93% | 10628 61% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.5 | 64.2 59% | 38 -6% | 38 -6% | 44.71 10% | 36.2 -11% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63.5 | 98.9 56% | 60 -6% | 59 -7% | 64.95 2% | 57 -10% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 9% /
18% | -33% /
-49% | 294% /
141% | -13% /
-12% | -9% /
-22% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6.4 ms subida | |
↘ 23.6 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
44.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida | |
↘ 28.4 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 73 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % de brillo | |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 1000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 1000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo Y40-59423035 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook A557 PL | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Lenovo Y40-59423035 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook A557 PL | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3809 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4361 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4594 puntos | |
ayuda |
HP Envy 15-as133cl HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | HP 15-ba077ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Liteonit CV3-8D128 | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 1425% | 5547% | 5871% | 1% | |
Read Seq | 103.2 | 123 19% | 447.4 334% | 348.6 238% | 109.5 6% |
Write Seq | 102.6 | 74.2 -28% | 243.3 137% | 311.8 204% | 105.2 3% |
Read 512 | 31.46 | 101.7 223% | 333.4 960% | 295.9 841% | 34.08 8% |
Write 512 | 46.3 | 42.51 -8% | 283.1 511% | 185.8 301% | 40.02 -14% |
Read 4k | 0.366 | 10.84 2862% | 20.99 5635% | 23.76 6392% | 0.429 17% |
Write 4k | 1.008 | 1.021 1% | 62.7 6120% | 44.94 4358% | 1.008 0% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.828 | 69.8 8330% | 143.1 17183% | 171.6 20625% | 0.81 -2% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.015 | 1.057 4% | 138 13496% | 143.2 14008% | 0.893 -12% |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Fujitsu LifeBook A557 PL | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Fujitsu LifeBook A557 PL |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE | |
Fujitsu LifeBook A557 PL | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE | |
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Fujitsu LifeBook A557 PL | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1780 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 72759 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6756 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 929 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 427 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52.7 | 30.7 | 26.4 | 8.3 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.2 | 12.1 | ||
Overwatch (2016) | 49.5 | 35.1 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 32.5 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 33.8 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 38.7 / 32.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
HP Envy 15-as133cl HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | HP 15-ba077ng Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | 4% | 3% | -7% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30.3 -1% | 30.6 -2% | 30.5 -2% | 29 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 32.5 | 31.6 3% | 31.5 3% | 31.4 3% | 32.2 1% | 30.6 6% |
Idle Average * | 32.5 | 31.6 3% | 31.8 2% | 31.4 3% | 32.2 1% | 30.6 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.5 | 33.4 -3% | 31.8 2% | 31.9 2% | 33.7 -4% | 30.6 6% |
Load Average * | 38.7 | 47.8 -24% | 31.4 19% | 33.7 13% | 39.4 -2% | 36.8 5% |
Load Maximum * | 32.5 | 47.8 -47% | 33.4 -3% | 33.8 -4% | 42.2 -30% | 38.2 -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.6 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.2 °C / 7.5 F).
HP Envy 15-as133cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.24 / 0.54 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.6 / 7.7 / 7.8 Watt |
Carga |
30.5 / 22.7 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy 15-as133cl | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | HP 15-ba077ng | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -145% | -7% | -76% | -56% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.6 | 6.6 -43% | 4.4 4% | 7.2 -57% | 6.16 -34% | 3.5 24% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 9 -17% | 6.8 12% | 10.3 -34% | 8.48 -10% | 6.1 21% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 10.7 -37% | 8.9 -14% | 11.9 -53% | 9.62 -23% | 7 10% |
Load Average * | 30.5 | 77.5 -154% | 30.9 -1% | 48.2 -58% | 41.63 -36% | 31.2 -2% |
Load Maximum * | 22.7 | 130 -473% | 31 -37% | 63 -178% | 63.22 -179% | 42.9 -89% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.8 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
HP Envy 15-as133cl i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | HP 15-ba077ng A12-9700P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 41 Wh | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 40 Wh | HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -1% | 15% | -33% | -8% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 573 | 565 -1% | 742 29% | 358 -38% | 438 -24% | 612 7% |
WiFi v1.3 | 408 | 334 -18% | 296 -27% | 257 -37% | 220 -46% | 230 -44% |
Load | 72 | 84 17% | 103 43% | 55 -24% | 106 47% | 81 13% |
Pro
Contra
Nada destaca particularmente en el Envy 15. Su chasis y su diseño lo hacen más atractivo que los competidores de Acer o Lenovo en precios por debajo de los 900 euros y la batería es muy buena, pero el rendimiento general es un poco decepcionante. El ventilador del sistema está en funcionamiento constante, las teclas del teclado y el clickpad son muy blandas, la cobertura sRGB es limitada, todas las configuraciones incluyen pantalla táctil y la tapa podría ser más firme y moverse menos. Recomendamos evitar configuraciones con HDD e invertir en uno con SSD para obtener un mayor rendimiento ya que instalarlo después es complicado.
Si el usuario puede optar a otros dispositivos de la competencia, el usuario encontrará un dispositivo mejor en el Dell XPS 15 9550. La configuración del Envy 15 con 256 GB de SSD sube el precio hasta casi los cuatro dígitos donde las configuraciones más modestas del XPS 15 9550, Spectre 15 x360, o la gama Asus Zenbook son inalcanzables.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP Envy 15-as133cl
- 02/13/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo