Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del portátil HP Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD)

¿Alguien, una actualización?Ha tardado un poco, pero ahora HP ha actualizado sus portátiles de 15" de la saga Omen en cuanto al rendimiento. Una CPU Kaby Lake y una gráfica Nvidia de la generación Pascal protagonizan esta mejora -pero ¿ha valido la pena la espera?
HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Omen 15-ce Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 382.05, Optimus
Memoría
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 2 de 2 ranuras usadas, Canal doble, max. 16 GB
pantalla
15.60 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, Full HD, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM175
Disco duro
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 SSD Type 2280 + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm, 2.5"
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm combo de audio , Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleración
Equipamento de red
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 24.5 x 382 x 253
Battería
63.3 Wh Litio-Ion, 4 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, Adaptador de corriente: 150 vatios, accesorios: guía de inicio rápido, otro material informativo, Programas: Microsoft Office 365 (demo), varias herramientas del fabricante, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
2.253 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 449 g
Precio
1510 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t

Size Comparison

389 mm 266 mm 29 mm 2.5 kg390 mm 266 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg385 mm 275 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg382 mm 253 mm 25 mm 2.2 kg382 mm 253 mm 24.5 mm 2.3 kg380 mm 267 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s +23%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s -43%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
282 MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
686 MBit/s
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s -21%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
307 MBit/s -55%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s -64%
240
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
AU Optronics AUO41ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 240 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 227.7 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 230 cd/m²
Contraste: 1095:1 (Negro: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.18 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.59% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
AU Optronics AUO41ED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
LGD0519, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
LP156WF6-SPK3, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
29%
1%
-6%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
38.59
59.9
55%

40.34
5%

38.88
1%
36.42
-6%
38.28
-1%
sRGB Coverage
58
85.9
48%

60.3
4%

58.2
0%
54.9
-5%
56.9
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.87
61.6
55%

41.73
5%

40.2
1%
37.62
-6%
39.47
-1%
Response Times
-21%
33%
-8%
-35%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(20.4, 21.6)
55 ?(22, 33)
-31%
22 ?(10, 12)
48%
36 ?(17, 19)
14%
58.8 ?(33.6, 25.2)
-40%
28.4 ?(11.2, 17.2)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
28 ?(16.4, 11.6)
31 ?(8, 23)
-11%
23 ?(13, 10)
18%
36 ?(19, 17)
-29%
36 ?(23.6, 12.4)
-29%
22.4 ?(6, 16.4)
20%
PWM Frequency
21550 ?(99)
Screen
-29%
-14%
-84%
-48%
-46%
Brightness middle
230
214
-7%
281
22%
246
7%
239
4%
209.5
-9%
Brightness
228
203
-11%
257
13%
235
3%
244
7%
205
-10%
Brightness Distribution
88
79
-10%
85
-3%
75
-15%
88
0%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.21
0.28
-33%
0.32
-52%
0.55
-162%
0.35
-67%
0.69
-229%
Contrast
1095
764
-30%
878
-20%
447
-59%
683
-38%
304
-72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.01
6.04
-51%
5.16
-29%
10.97
-174%
7.3
-82%
4.7
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.26
12
-65%
9.09
-25%
24.7
-240%
19.7
-171%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.18
5.91
-86%
4.57
-44%
14.25
-348%
4.9
-54%
1.8
43%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.44 90%
2.59 85%
1.83 120%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
CCT
6814 95%
7362 88%
6931 94%
11200 58%
7332 89%
6975 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
38
3%
37
0%
35
-5%
35
-5%
36.2
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
60
3%
58
0%
55
-5%
55
-5%
56.6
-2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-7% / -9%
7% / -5%
-33% / -56%
-42% / -46%
-7% / -28%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 16.4 ms subida
↘ 11.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 20.4 ms subida
↘ 21.6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z (Render test)
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (benchmark)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points -9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points -2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
652 Points -11%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points -5%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points -8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.12 Points -13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.9 Points
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.3 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
261.3 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
257.1 Points -4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
218.5 Points -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
39851 Points +10%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38128 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
36293 Points
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
33799 Points -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1069 ms * -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
994 ms * -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
965 ms * -2%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
947 ms * -0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
945 ms *

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6842 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
28665 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7432 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.16 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
90.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points +14%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4165 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points -1%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
3946 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points -8%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5268 Points +68%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points +61%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5003 Points +59%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points +41%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3141 Points
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points -13%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
7220 Points +34%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5402 Points
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5318 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
4992 Points -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4165 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5402 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3141 puntos
PCMark 10 Score
4653 puntos
ayuda
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (SSD)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (SSD)
ATTO
ATTO
CrystalDiskInfo (SSD)
CrystalDiskInfo (SSD)
HD Tune
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (HDD)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (HDD)
CrystalDiskInfo (HDD)
CrystalDiskInfo (HDD)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-65%
-97%
-60%
-6%
-67%
10%
Read Seq
1657
475.7
-71%
101.5
-94%
485.8
-71%
2170
31%
503
-70%
2141
29%
Write Seq
1208
169.2
-86%
100.6
-92%
422.8
-65%
1202
0%
138.2
-89%
1621
34%
Read 512
806
327.6
-59%
28.33
-96%
338.9
-58%
786
-2%
343.5
-57%
499.7
-38%
Write 512
807
169.6
-79%
28.31
-96%
304
-62%
822
2%
137.8
-83%
1531
90%
Read 4k
62.6
33.14
-47%
0.327
-99%
27.11
-57%
58.9
-6%
29.36
-53%
54.2
-13%
Write 4k
176.9
81.4
-54%
0.846
-100%
85.4
-52%
146.4
-17%
70.9
-60%
158.2
-11%
Read 4k QD32
650
276.8
-57%
0.718
-100%
279.6
-57%
457.7
-30%
369.9
-43%
632
-3%
Write 4k QD32
557
168
-70%
0.893
-100%
255.1
-54%
392.9
-29%
99.7
-82%
527
-5%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1657 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1208 MB/s
512K Read: 806 MB/s
512K Write: 807 MB/s
4K Read: 62.6 MB/s
4K Write: 176.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 650 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 557 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver (Stress test)
3DMark Sky Diver (Stress test)
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy (Stress test)
3DMark Time Spy (Stress test)
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
80496 Points +70%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
50981 Points +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
49539 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
47250 Points
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
46362 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
36659 Points -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11633 Points +49%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7821 Points
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7791 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7682 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7646 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
5904 Points -25%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14732 Points +49%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9909 Points
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9768 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9725 Points -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
7919 Points -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
9045 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85236 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22010 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6720 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3550 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
2455 puntos
ayuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
bajomedioaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 216 176.8 163.4 70.7
Battlefield 4 (2013) 180.2 176.4 146 71.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 128.1 86.2 48.3 26.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 115.4 68.2 38.9 32.5

Ruido

Ocioso
32 / 34 / 36 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
Carga
48 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Noise
3%
11%
6%
13%
6%
7%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30.4
-1%
30.3
-1%
27.7
8%
28.7
4%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
32
32
-0%
31.4
2%
30.9
3%
30.5
5%
30.6
4%
33.1
-3%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
31.4
8%
30.9
9%
30.5
10%
30.6
10%
33.1
3%
Idle Maximum *
36
36
-0%
31.4
13%
31
14%
30.6
15%
31
14%
34
6%
Load Average *
48
43
10%
36.8
23%
46.5
3%
40
17%
46.2
4%
37.2
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
40
18%
46.1
6%
Load Maximum *
51
49
4%
41.3
19%
46.8
8%
42.6
16%
52.3
-3%
47.1
8%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Heat
3%
9%
21%
4%
-3%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
52.4
48.5
7%
47
10%
43.4
17%
46.8
11%
53.2
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
54.2
59
-9%
47
13%
37.7
30%
55.8
-3%
56.8
-5%
Idle Upper Side *
30.5
28.7
6%
28.4
7%
24.3
20%
27.6
10%
28.8
6%
28.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
28.2
25.7
9%
27.1
4%
23.6
16%
28.4
-1%
31.4
-11%
29.6
-5%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

 38.3 °C52.4 °C47.9 °C 
 31.4 °C48.6 °C48.5 °C 
 27.3 °C42.8 °C45.4 °C 
Máximo: 52.4 °C
Médio: 42.5 °C
51 °C54.2 °C35.7 °C
41.8 °C38 °C28.7 °C
44.8 °C37.5 °C27 °C
Máximo: 54.2 °C
Médio: 39.9 °C
Conector de corriente  48.6 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.4 °C / 113.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-16.6 °C / -29.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.742.52534.236.93130314043.844.55033.834.76326.828.38024.927.710025.930.712524.636.116023.343.32002448.225022.853.831521.859.740020.161.650019.563.563018.967.180018.269.4100018.369.7125017.971.1160017.569.2200017.467.3250017.568.5315017.766.7400017.767.7500017.568.6630017.664.2800017.660.8100001854.91250018.752.81600017.548.7SPL30.379.6N1.445.9median 18.2median 63.5Delta1.58.537.839.434.837.433.634.533.832.43331.634.436.232.732.130.53130.43228.530.22834.427.345.826.255.125.858.124.959.324.963.227.262.325.263.424.969.623.770.423.866.123.774.123.374.623.17523.170.92372.42369.623.163.722.963.723.256.136.3832.751.8median 24.9median 63.41.99.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-ax213ngMSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
HP Omen 15-ax213ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 6 / 11 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 81 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Power Consumption
-1%
6%
26%
5%
-40%
-51%
Idle Minimum *
6
7
-17%
7
-17%
4.4
27%
8.5
-42%
14.9
-148%
14.5
-142%
Idle Average *
11
11
-0%
10.2
7%
6.8
38%
9.1
17%
15.1
-37%
17.3
-57%
Idle Maximum *
18
19
-6%
14
22%
8.3
54%
9.7
46%
15.2
16%
17.4
3%
Load Average *
81
79
2%
78
4%
81
-0%
79.9
1%
105.8
-31%
93
-15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90
97.7
-9%
128.8
-43%
Load Maximum *
146
119
18%
127
13%
127
13%
121.5
17%
148.8
-2%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

maximum battery runtime
maximum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
charging time
charging time
Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
12h 45min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
7h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 16min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 37min
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 63.3 Wh
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 74 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh
Duración de Batería
-14%
-34%
54%
-43%
-41%
-40%
Reader / Idle
765
467
-39%
322
-58%
1174
53%
509
-33%
363
-53%
386
-50%
H.264
196
244
24%
455
132%
WiFi v1.3
428
272
-36%
302
-29%
622
45%
240
-44%
277
-35%
232
-46%
Load
97
93
-4%
81
-16%
81
-16%
46
-53%
64
-34%
75
-23%

Pro

+ buen rendimiento del sistema
+ almacenamiento SSD rápido
+ mucho almacenamiento (SSD + HDD)
+ 16 GB RAM
+ larga duración de la batería
+ buen rendimiento en 3D (para FHD)
+ posicionamiento de puertos inteligente
+ compacto
+ teclado retroiluminado
+ Conmutación de gráficos
+ ligero
+ diseño liso

Contra

- muy audible bajo carga
- escasa elección de puerto (no USB 3.1 Gen2, no DisplayPort, ...)
- display FHD mediocre (brillo, espacio de color, ...)
- la carcasa cruje en algunas partes
- el mantenimiento debería ser más fácil
- sonido de poca calidad
HP Omen 15 2017, modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de
HP Omen 15 2017, modelo de pruebas cortesía de notebooksbilliger.de

Al HP Omen 15t (2017) no le será fácil, especialmente con la competencia que ya ha ofrecido varios dispositivos con la nueva arquitectura Pascal. El dispositivo de 15" tiene buen diseño, aunque la construcción podría haber sido mejor para un dispositivo de $1500. No podemos comprender como no tiene puertos modernos como DisplayPort o USB 3.1 Gen2. su conectividad no está preparada para el futuro. 

 

El HP Omen 15t (2017) mostró un rendimiento sólido, que jugó muy a su favor en nuestra evaluación. El dispositivo está equipado con una Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti y un Intel Core i7-7700HQ fuerte. Esta combinación, ayudada de los 1 GB de RAM permite jugar juegos actuales suavemente aun con gran cantidad de detalles.

 

Si estabas esperando el HP Omen 15t (2017), te premiará con un rendimiento gaming confiable. como sea, el fabricante ha decidido no actualizar sus puertos y quedarse con lo que conocía

 

HP tambien ha perdido varios puntos debido a la pantalla, que no es lo suficientemente brillante. La cobertura del espacio de color es igual de decepcionante. Aun así, nos ha gustado el rendimiento del sistema del HP Omen 15,  mejorada con su SSD NVMe.

 

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Omen 15-ax213ng - 07/03/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabado
75 / 98 → 77%
Teclado
77%
Ratón
72%
Conectividad
53 / 81 → 66%
Peso
61 / 20-67 → 88%
Battería
79%
Pantalla
86%
Rendimiento de juegos
90 / 85 → 100%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
90 / 92 → 98%
Temperatura
83%
Ruido
68 / 95 → 71%
Audio
65%
Médio
75%
82%
Multimedia - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil HP Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD)
Sebastian Bade, 2017-07- 9 (Update: 2017-07-10)