Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del portátil HP Omen 17 (GTX 1060)

Equilibrado. Con un precio de compra de casi 1300 euros, el Omen 17 w100ng es es dispositivo más barato de su linea. Aunque el rendimiento es ligeramente inferior, ejecuta juegos con fluidez en su panel Full HD mate. El Omen ofrece muy buena duración de batería para tratarse de un portátil de juegos.
HP Omen 17-w100ng (Omen 15-ce Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i5-6300HQ 4 x 2.3 - 3.2 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Samsung), interfaz de 192 bit, ForceWare 376.33, no Optimus, iGPU deaktiviert
Memoría
8 GB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel, dos ranuras de memoría (las dos ocupadas)
pantalla
17.30 pulgadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 75 Hz, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB 
, m.2-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
3 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: salida de auriculares, entrada de micrófono, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerometro, TPM 2.0
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 33 x 416 x 279
Battería
95.8 Wh, 0 mAh Litio-Ion, 6 celdas
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: cuatro altavoces, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, PSU: 230 Watt, McAfee LiveSafe (versión de prueba), MS Office 365 (versión de prueba), varias herramientas del fabricante, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
3.23 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 811 g
Precio
1300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
76.4 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
76 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
 
73 MB/s
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
72.6 MB/s -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
89.9 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
87 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
 
87 MB/s
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
84.6 MB/s -3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s -68%
326
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
LG Philips LGD046E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 364 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 331 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 342 cd/m²
Contraste: 1069:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080
Display
-3%
27%
1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
67.2
65.1
-3%
90
34%
68
1%
66.6
-1%
sRGB Coverage
86.6
83.5
-4%
99.9
15%
87.5
1%
84.1
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.3
61.1
-3%
83.6
32%
64
1%
61.5
-3%
Response Times
-1%
41%
1%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35 ?(14, 21)
38 ?(12, 26)
-9%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
20%
33.6 ?(14, 19.6)
4%
37 ?(13, 24)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
25 ?(4, 21)
23 ?(5, 18)
8%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
62%
25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)
-2%
24 ?(4, 20)
4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-28%
15%
-10%
2%
Brightness middle
342
326
-5%
337.2
-1%
329.2
-4%
362
6%
Brightness
331
312
-6%
315
-5%
321
-3%
342
3%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
86
2%
93
11%
87
4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.5
-56%
0.308
4%
0.267
17%
0.31
3%
Contrast
1069
652
-39%
1095
2%
1233
15%
1168
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.35
6.3
-45%
2.96
32%
5.93
-36%
4.5
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.24
11.69
-27%
5.45
41%
11.07
-20%
9.31
-1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.73
7.37
-98%
2.57
31%
6.72
-80%
3.48
7%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.37 93%
2.25 98%
2.12 104%
2.23 99%
CCT
6801 96%
7116 91%
7114 91%
7611 85%
6144 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
55
-4%
74.3
30%
57
0%
55
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
83
-3%
100
16%
87
1%
84
-2%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-11% / -19%
28% / 21%
-3% / -6%
-0% / 1%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8719 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB (86%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)
HP Omen 17 vs. AdobeRGB (57%)

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
25 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 4 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
35 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 14 ms subida
↘ 21 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 44 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8258
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
16456
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4815
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
59.6 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.49 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
464 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points +3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
118 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points +46%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points +45%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
468 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
461 Points -1%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points +23%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points +22%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points +22%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16609 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16456 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16161 Points -2%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points +6%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5026 Points +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4815 Points
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4759 Points -1%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3301 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3168 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points -8%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points +28%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9520 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
9307 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
3933 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
10421 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.2 Points +22%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
252 Points +14%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.4 Points +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.8 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
220.4 Points
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
196.1 Points -11%
PCMark 7 Score
5990 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4711 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6858 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5252 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points -11%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points -5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points -9%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Sequential Read: 495 MB/s
Sequential Write: 180.2 MB/s
512K Read: 315.5 MB/s
512K Write: 172.4 MB/s
4K Read: 20.25 MB/s
4K Write: 76.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 141.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 170.8 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-80%
13%
43%
122%
Read Seq
495
134.6
-73%
334.3
-32%
481.7
-3%
1156
134%
Write Seq
180.2
130.6
-28%
319
77%
315.4
75%
294.9
64%
Read 512
315.5
44.85
-86%
242.3
-23%
303.1
-4%
616
95%
Write 512
172.4
63.3
-63%
254.4
48%
314.4
82%
294.7
71%
Read 4k
20.25
0.602
-97%
20.3
0%
25.93
28%
42.7
111%
Write 4k
76.1
1.146
-98%
42.51
-44%
84.6
11%
153.3
101%
Read 4k QD32
141.6
1.106
-99%
251.6
78%
273.9
93%
600
324%
Write 4k QD32
170.8
1.186
-99%
167.1
-2%
274.9
61%
295.3
73%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
24318 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
10805 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
111645 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15394 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8654 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4806 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3339 puntos
ayuda
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
86780 Points +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
79578 Points +6%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
79107 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
74982 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
67791 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15806 Points +40%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11506 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11326 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11311 Points 0%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23356 Points +60%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
20656 Points +41%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14904 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14642 Points
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14317 Points -2%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
123.8 fps +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
103.8 (19.8min - 180.2max) fps +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
100 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
99.1 fps
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
98.9 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
98.1 fps -1%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
94 fps -5%
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
101.5 fps
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
99.1 fps -2%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
94 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
92.9 fps -8%
Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
110.1 fps +40%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
79 fps +1%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
78.5 fps
Anno 2205 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x
SCHENKER XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
81.1 fps +25%
Razer Blade (2016) FHD
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
79.2 fps +22%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6300HQ
64.7 fps
bajomedioaltoultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 290.5 289.2 274.9 140
BioShock Infinite (2013) 197.8 176.2 164.8 99.1
Battlefield 4 (2013) 188.8 172.8 155.7 101.5
Anno 2205 (2015) 81.9 75 64.7 30.2
Just Cause 3 (2015) 94.6 83 76.7 70.4
Far Cry Primal (2016) 94 82 73 59
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 97.1 93 56.5 29.2
FIFA 17 (2016) 276.7 270.8 222.5 227.3
Battlefield 1 (2016) 136.4 117.5 86.6 78.5
Civilization VI (2016) 58.1 47.1 43 42.8
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.5 143.5 89.7 80

Ruido

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
Carga
44 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise
10%
6%
4%
4%
off / environment *
31
30.5
2%
28.4
8%
29.7
4%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
35
31.4
10%
31.9
9%
33.2
5%
33
6%
Idle Average *
36
31.4
13%
32
11%
33.2
8%
34
6%
Idle Maximum *
37
31.5
15%
34
8%
33.2
10%
35
5%
Load Average *
44
40.9
7%
47
-7%
47.5
-8%
45
-2%
Load Maximum *
54
46.2
14%
49.4
9%
52.5
3%
52
4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 41.5 °C39.1 °C39.3 °C 
 37.1 °C37.4 °C33.4 °C 
 32.5 °C33.5 °C29.9 °C 
Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 36 °C
44.9 °C42.4 °C45.5 °C
30.2 °C35.3 °C37.7 °C
23.3 °C27.7 °C24.5 °C
Máximo: 45.5 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C
Conector de corriente  38.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat
-11%
-9%
-24%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.5
53.1
-28%
50.8
-22%
59
-42%
45
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
45.5
44.9
1%
60
-32%
66
-45%
54.3
-19%
Idle Upper Side *
31.8
32.9
-3%
27.4
14%
33.2
-4%
29.6
7%
Idle Bottom *
29.6
33.4
-13%
28.8
3%
30.6
-3%
28.6
3%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.937.82539.544.63133.238.44028.830.75025.227.16326.126.98025.328.710024.829.21252430.216025.140.920021.655.125022.26431521.167.540019.968.150019.567.66301971.780020.474.1100018.770.9125019.468.8160019.674.2200018.172.9250017.871315017.875400017.976.3500017.975.5630017.977.480001876.11000017.981.41250017.8791600017.769.6SPL30.887N1.572.4median 19median 71.7Delta1.26.239.334.639.341.739.641.742.839.942.837.235.237.237.532.337.541.828.241.830.32630.340.72640.748.325.448.349.623.349.647.623.847.65222.75258.221.658.263.920.263.95719.65756.618.656.657.218.657.256.51856.554.817.454.857.117.957.158.117.558.158.217.858.26017.96066.21866.259.818.359.853.418.453.448.518.448.548.918.448.948.718.248.743.418.443.471.330.571.328.31.428.3median 56.5median 18.4median 56.55.11.15.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 17-w100ngAsus GL702VM-GC102D
HP Omen 17-w100ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17 / 22 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 72 / 141 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC940
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption
3%
-35%
-40%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
17
15.6
8%
22.6
-33%
18.4
-8%
19
-12%
Idle Average *
22
20.2
8%
32.7
-49%
22.8
-4%
25
-14%
Idle Maximum *
29
21.4
26%
32.8
-13%
24
17%
31
-7%
Load Average *
72
90
-25%
114.7
-59%
175.5
-144%
90
-25%
Load Maximum *
141
147
-4%
167.9
-19%
229.5
-63%
193
-37%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
9h 03min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
6h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 13min
Carga (máximo brillo)
2h 25min
HP Omen 17-w100ng
6300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 95.8 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh
Duración de Batería
-31%
-43%
-32%
-25%
Reader / Idle
543
353
-35%
353
-35%
418
-23%
432
-20%
H.264
313
262
-16%
233
-26%
WiFi v1.3
363
250
-31%
213
-41%
201
-45%
247
-32%
Load
145
87
-40%
66
-54%
103
-29%
115
-21%

Pro

+ Buen ratio precio-rendimiento
+ Ranura M.2 con soporte NVMe
+ Soporte G-Sync
+ Panel IPS mate
+ SSD+HDD

Contra

- El touchpad no transmite buenas sensaciones
- No tiene USB 3.1 Type-C Gen2
Análisis: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Modelo de prueba cedido por Nvidia
Análisis: HP Omen 17-w100ng. Modelo de prueba cedido por Nvidia

El modelo básico de la gama Omen no tiene CPU Core i7 sino que ofrece "solo" un Core i5-6300HQ. Por tanto el comprador "solo" tiene que desembolsar 1300 euros. Sin embargo el procesador instalado tiene potencia más que suficiente para los escenarios comunes. El 6300HQ junto a la unidad gráfica GeForce GTX 1060 renderiza casi todos los juegos actuales en resolución Full HD en ajustes altos e, incluso, a veces máximos. La tecnología G-Sync asegura una reproducción de imagen fluida en la pantalla de 75 Hz.

Con el Omen 17 w100ng, HP lanza un equlibrado modelo de gama de entrada en el mundo de los portátiles para juegos.

El Omen tiene no obstante puntos de mejora: HP debería, por ejemplo, mejorar el ruido generado. El portátil genera más ruido del necesario. El sistema de refrigeración parece haber sido diseñado para la combinación de Core i7-6700 y GeForce GTX 1070. Una actualización de la BIOS podría mejorar las cosas. El portátil tampoco ofrece puertos USB 3.1 Gen2 o Thunderbolt 3, que es lo que se esperaría en un portátil actual de este precio.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

HP Omen 17-w100ng - 01/18/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
77%
Ratón
72%
Conectividad
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
55 / 10-66 → 80%
Battería
85%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
91%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
90%
Temperatura
89 / 95 → 94%
Ruido
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
70%
Cámara
69 / 85 → 81%
Médio
76%
82%
Gaming - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del portátil HP Omen 17 (GTX 1060)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-02-10 (Update: 2017-02-10)