Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo Ideapad 120s (11")
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR |
|
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 266.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 397:1 (Negro: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 14.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.33% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.03% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP AU Optronics AUO-B116XTN02.5 , TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP Chi Mei N140BGA-EA3, TN LED, 14", 1366x768 | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR Chi Mei CMN1132, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E AU Optronics B116HAN05.0, IPS, 11.6", 1920x1080 | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 SDC8353, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS Chi Mei CMN1130, N116BGE-EB2, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Chi Mei CMN0001, IPS, 10.1", 1280x800 | Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q Chi Mei N116BGE-EA2, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 6% | 10% | 26% | 71% | 12% | 10% | 8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.03 | 41.32 6% | 42.77 10% | 49.67 27% | 68 74% | 43.73 12% | 43.01 10% | 42.04 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.7 | 62 6% | 64.2 9% | 72.6 24% | 98.4 68% | 65.1 11% | 63.9 9% | 62.9 7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.33 | 42.7 6% | 44.2 10% | 51.4 27% | 69.5 72% | 45.23 12% | 44.53 10% | 43.46 8% |
Response Times | 39% | 3% | 23% | -1% | 30% | 20% | 6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 72.8 ? | 35.2 ? 52% | 46 ? 37% | 36 ? 51% | 48.4 ? 34% | 45 ? 38% | 27 ? 63% | 38 ? 48% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22.8 ? | 17.2 ? 25% | 30 ? -32% | 24 ? -5% | 30.8 ? -35% | 18 ? 21% | 28 ? -23% | 31 ? -36% |
PWM Frequency | 495 ? | 25770 ? | 24750 ? | 50 ? | ||||
Screen | 4% | 14% | 50% | 76% | 31% | 42% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 266.2 | 257.4 -3% | 243 -9% | 251 -6% | 224 -16% | 267 0% | 341 28% | 218 -18% |
Brightness | 251 | 239 -5% | 230 -8% | 247 -2% | 219 -13% | 265 6% | 339 35% | 215 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 81 -10% | 85 -6% | 90 0% | 85 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.54 19% | 0.4 40% | 0.21 69% | 0.13 81% | 0.35 48% | 0.28 58% | 0.38 43% |
Contrast | 397 | 477 20% | 608 53% | 1195 201% | 1723 334% | 763 92% | 1218 207% | 574 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.4 | 11.8 5% | 11.24 9% | 4.27 66% | 2.4 81% | 6.67 46% | 9.53 23% | 10.29 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 24.5 | 28 -14% | 19.82 19% | 11 55% | 3.7 85% | 10.32 58% | 15.9 35% | 17.68 28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.4 | 13.3 8% | 12.78 11% | 3.77 74% | 2.5 83% | 7.84 46% | 10.74 25% | 11.71 19% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.3 96% | 2.71 81% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 19436 33% | 16811 39% | 15436 42% | 6524 100% | 6869 95% | 8076 80% | 10206 64% | 14164 46% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 39 5% | 41 11% | 47 27% | 63.4 71% | 42 14% | 41 11% | 40 8% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 62 5% | 64 8% | 72 22% | 98.3 67% | 65 10% | 60 2% | 63 7% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 16% /
9% | 9% /
11% | 33% /
42% | 49% /
65% | 24% /
27% | 24% /
33% | 9% /
11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
22.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16.4 ms subida | |
↘ 6.4 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 47 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms). | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
72.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 30.4 ms subida | |
↘ 42.4 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 99 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Asus PU551LA-XO359G |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1810 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1859 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2634 puntos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 1150 puntos | |
ayuda |
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR SanDisk DF4032 | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 64 GB eMMC Flash | HP 15-bw075ax WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | Dell Latitude 13 7380 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 6% | 13% | -46% | -71% | 1424% | 1451% | |
Write 4K | 12.19 | 12.44 2% | 13.87 14% | 3.23 -74% | 0.76 -94% | 139.8 1047% | 170.9 1302% |
Read 4K | 6.61 | 9.59 45% | 12.23 85% | 5.37 -19% | 0.29 -96% | 44.89 579% | 46.43 602% |
Write Seq | 108.2 | 104.9 -3% | 101.7 -6% | 49.49 -54% | 64.8 -40% | 1224 1031% | 996 821% |
Read Seq | 167.1 | 169.9 2% | 165.1 -1% | 153.3 -8% | 65.9 -61% | 1571 840% | 942 464% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 15.38 | 15.3 -1% | 13.63 -11% | 3.6 -77% | 0.84 -95% | 627 3977% | 469.1 2950% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 31.28 | 32.1 3% | 36.23 16% | 17.4 -44% | 0.7 -98% | 504 1511% | 540 1626% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 96.2 | 98.1 2% | 94.8 -1% | 24 -75% | 65.6 -32% | 1231 1180% | 1582 1544% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 134.1 | 134.9 1% | 147.5 10% | 113.2 -16% | 65.7 -51% | 1779 1227% | 3218 2300% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 3506 puntos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 530 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2031 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 301 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 18 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (23.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(-) | highs are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.26 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.8 / 4.2 / 5.1 Watt |
Carga |
11.8 / 12.1 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), SanDisk DF4032, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6" | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Liteonit CV3-8D256, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | -64% | -37% | -82% | -21% | -33% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 2.7 4% | 7 -150% | 4.6 -64% | 5.9 -111% | 4.3 -54% | 3.9 -39% | 6.2 -121% |
Idle Average * | 4.2 | 5.3 -26% | 8.2 -95% | 6.6 -57% | 7.7 -83% | 6 -43% | 7.4 -76% | 8 -90% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.1 | 5.7 -12% | 8.5 -67% | 7.1 -39% | 8.6 -69% | 6.3 -24% | 7.8 -53% | 8.6 -69% |
Load Average * | 11.8 | 12.9 -9% | 12.5 -6% | 13.8 -17% | 18.2 -54% | 11.4 3% | 11.6 2% | 13.5 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 12.1 | 13.1 -8% | 12.3 -2% | 13.1 -8% | 23.6 -95% | 10.8 11% | 11.7 3% | 13.8 -14% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 32 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 32 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 39.1 Wh | Acer Spin 1 SP111-31-C79E Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 48.9 Wh | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 36.48 Wh | Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 38 Wh | Acer One 10 S1002-17HU Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 31 Wh | Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 49 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -16% | -12% | 30% | -9% | 23% | 6% | 35% | |
Reader / Idle | 919 | 957 4% | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 434 | 419 -3% | 384 -12% | 564 30% | 395 -9% | 534 23% | 459 6% | 584 35% |
Load | 230 | 118 -49% |
Pro
Contra
El Lenovo Ideapad 120s de 11.6" tiene muchas cosas similares a su hermano mayor y viene con muchos de los mismos compromisos. La mayor diferencia, quitando el tamaño, es la limitada RAM de 2 GB que se encuentra en la máquina pequeña. En el uso en el mundo real, esto dificulta en gran medida la multitarea y tareas de alto contenido, como la navegación web. Sin embargo, aparte de estos puntos, ambos dispositivos son increíblemente similares.
Al final es cuestión de gustos. La variante más pequeña es más ligera, más portátil y tiende a funcionar un poco más fría. El modelo de 14" tiene una pantalla más grande, más memoria y pruebas un poco mejores. El teclado en el 120 14" también es un poco mejor, principalmente debido a las teclas más grandes, pero la pantalla es posiblemente peor que su contraparte de 11,6".
Hay dos consideraciones principales al decidir entre estos dos dispositivos. Si desea un portátil pequeño por debajo de 200$, el Ideapad 120s de 11,6" es su mejor opción. Implica algunos sacrificios pero ofrece el mismo paquete que el 120 14" (en su mayor parte). Si desea una experiencia de escritura más cómoda, el de 14" debe ser su elección. El otro factor es el precio; el modelo de 11,6" es aproximadamente 50$ más barato, lo que podría hacerlo más atractivo para los consumidores preocupados por los precios. De cualquier manera, ambas opciones ofrecen una buena, pero limitada, experiencia en este punto de precio.
Los compradores con bajo presupuesto que busquen ahorrar 70$ o un dispositivo más pequeño deberían considerar el Ideapad 120s de 11.6". Como su hermano mayor, el Ideapad 120s es difícil de batir en este punto de precio.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
- 12/10/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley