Breve análisis del portátil PC Specialist Proteus V (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full-HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 1152:1 (Negro: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.17 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| PC Zentrum Proteus V BOEhydis NV156FHM-N42 (BOE06C6), 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 52% | 24% | 56% | 50% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.13 | 64.3 64% | 48.21 23% | 65.8 68% | 63.5 62% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58 | 83 43% | 72.6 25% | 85.1 47% | 82 41% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.42 | 60.6 50% | 49.81 23% | 62.2 54% | 59.9 48% |
| Response Times | 13% | -2% | 18% | 34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.8 ? | 40.8 ? 23% | 28 ? 47% | 41 ? 22% | 37 ? 30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39.6 ? | 30.4 ? 23% | 23.6 ? 40% | 34 ? 14% | 25 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 21930 ? | 20490 ? -7% | 1351 ? -94% | ||
| Screen | -11% | -59% | -2% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 242 | 297 23% | 274.2 13% | 322 33% | 287 19% |
| Brightness | 235 | 276 17% | 263 12% | 297 26% | 289 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 92 8% | 86 1% | 87 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.3 -43% | 0.44 -110% | 0.31 -48% | 0.29 -38% |
| Contrast | 1152 | 990 -14% | 623 -46% | 1039 -10% | 990 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 5.25 -23% | 8 -87% | 4.73 -11% | 4.92 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.09 | 10.3 -45% | 14.6 -106% | 12.37 -74% | 11 -55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.17 | 4.64 -114% | 9.1 -319% | 2.99 -38% | 3.66 -69% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.39 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6912 94% | 6600 98% | 5020 129% | 6905 94% | 6482 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 54 46% | 45.7 24% | 56 51% | 54 46% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 83 43% | 72.1 24% | 85 47% | 82 41% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 18% /
6% | -12% /
-33% | 24% /
12% | 26% /
11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 97 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 52.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 25.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 88 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 21930 Hz | ≤ 95 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 21930 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 95 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 21930 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8719 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4916 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3904 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| PC Zentrum Proteus V Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 20% | 26% | -68% | ||
| Seq Read | 2541 | 2678 5% | 2719 7% | 514 -80% | |
| Seq Write | 1180 | 1172 -1% | 1550 31% | 328.1 -72% | |
| 4K Read | 51 | 46.56 -9% | 48.01 -6% | 23.34 -54% | |
| 4K Write | 136.4 | 142.9 5% | 127.6 -6% | 48.47 -64% | |
| Score Read | 1472 | 1639 11% | 1549 5% | 393 -73% | |
| Score Write | 677 | 1323 95% | 1468 117% | 248 -63% | |
| Score Total | 2842 | 3728 31% | 3756 32% | 840 -70% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12205 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 143270 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26044 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10010 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72.2 | 39.9 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 68 | 52 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 43.4 | 41.8 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 68.1 | 51.9 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 94.1 | 78.4 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 77.4 | 70.7 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 57 | 47 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 93.8 | 70.4 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 77.8 | 73.7 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 80.6 | 62.3 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 37 / 38 / 39 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 47 / 52 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | 10% | 11% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 31 | 29 6% | 28.8 7% | 30.4 2% | 30 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 37 | 31 16% | 33.1 11% | 30.9 16% | 33 11% |
| Idle Average * | 38 | 32 16% | 33.1 13% | 30.9 19% | 34 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 39 | 34 13% | 34 13% | 31.5 19% | 35 10% |
| Load Average * | 47 | 41 13% | 37.2 21% | 40.7 13% | 39 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 39 9% | 46.1 -7% | 45.5 -6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 47 10% | 47.1 9% | 43.9 16% | 50 4% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -23% | 0% | -6% | 8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 53 -20% | 51.9 -18% | 49.6 -13% | |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 61 -15% | 54.6 -3% | 47.7 10% | |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 35 -21% | 28.4 2% | 29.1 -0% | 23.6 19% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 39 -34% | 29.6 -2% | 29.3 -1% | 24.6 15% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PC Zentrum Proteus V audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 28 / 32 / 38 Watt |
| Carga |
91 / 152 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 28% | 35% | 41% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 18 36% | 14.5 48% | 7.2 74% | 8 71% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 22 31% | 17.3 46% | 10.5 67% | 13 59% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 26 32% | 17.4 54% | 16 58% | 18 53% |
| Load Average * | 91 | 93 -2% | 93 -2% | 82 10% | 76 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 124 | 119 4% | 128.8 -4% | 124 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 152 | 175 -15% | 155 -2% | 143 6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 82 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 69 Wh | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 22% | 26% | 90% | 115% | |
| Reader / Idle | 221 | 300 36% | 386 75% | 501 127% | 789 257% |
| H.264 | 200 | 234 17% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 196 | 282 44% | 232 18% | 357 82% | 346 77% |
| Load | 89 | 80 -10% | 75 -16% | 144 62% | 98 10% |
Pro
Contra
Si el aguante de la batería no es importante y tampoco lo son los altavoces internos para escuchar música, ver películas o jugar juegos, entonces el Proteus V de PC Specialist puede ser una alternativa viable a un precio justo. Además de la elegante carcasa hecha de aluminio, también nos gustaron los dispositivos de entrada.
Su rendimiento general es más que decente. Equipado con 16 GB de RAM DDR4 y un SSD, el Proteus V puede mantenerse al día con los gustos de Acer, Asus o MSI. Los juegos modernos funcionan sin problemas en la resolución FHD nativa del dispositivo de 1920 x 1080 gracias al procesador Core i7-7700HQ y la tarjeta gráfica GTX 1060.
Desafortunadamente, la pantalla FHD resultó ser bastante pobre. A pesar de su alto índice de contraste y bajo nivel de negro, simplemente no se ilumina lo suficiente como para dejar una impresión positiva duradera, y tiene una cobertura de espacio de color inferior. Los controles de velocidad de los ventiladores necesitan una renovación masiva tan pronto como sea posible. Las bajas temperaturas del dispositivo son una señal de que los ventiladores giran demasiado fuerte; ventiladores con el potencial de molestar a los usuarios del portátil con bastante rapidez. Con suerte, el Especialista en PC mejorará esto con una futura actualización de BIOS.
Por lo tanto, a fecha de redacción, preferiríamos recomendar el Schenker XMG Core 15, algo más cálido pero significativamente más silencioso, a pesar de la falta de superficies metálicas brillantes. Pueden encontrar otros competidores de 15" en nuestra top 10 (ligeros) y en página de pruebas de la GTX 1060.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
PC Zentrum Proteus V
- 12/16/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
