Breve análisis del portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N (i5-7200U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 510.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 774:1 (Negro: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, 13.9", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -20% | 35% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.4 | 64.6 2% | 48.94 -23% | 99.2 56% | 62.2 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 88.6 | 88.8 0% | 73.3 -17% | 99.9 13% | 90.1 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64 | 64.8 1% | 50.5 -21% | 87.1 36% | 63.5 -1% |
| Response Times | -4% | 12% | 6% | 9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.6 ? | 46 ? -11% | 32.8 ? 21% | 42.8 ? -3% | 46 ? -11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 33 ? 3% | 33.2 ? 2% | 28.8 ? 15% | 24 ? 29% |
| PWM Frequency | 210.1 ? | ||||
| Screen | -26% | -30% | 29% | -49% | |
| Brightness middle | 510.7 | 404 -21% | 351.2 -31% | 588 15% | 348 -32% |
| Brightness | 481 | 382 -21% | 325 -32% | 561 17% | 310 -36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 92 2% | 80 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.66 | 0.35 47% | 0.195 70% | 0.45 32% | 0.25 62% |
| Contrast | 774 | 1154 49% | 1801 133% | 1307 69% | 1392 80% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 5.37 -124% | 7.4 -208% | 1.7 29% | 7.86 -228% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 9.46 -30% | 9.08 -24% | 3.5 52% | 13.43 -84% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 6.44 -168% | 6.71 -180% | 1.9 21% | 8.25 -244% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.52 87% | 2.74 80% | 2.33 94% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6747 96% | 6738 96% | 7222 90% | 6738 96% | 6834 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 58 2% | 50.48 -11% | 77.92 37% | 58 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.1 | 89 1% | 73.31 -17% | 99.94 13% | 90 2% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -10% /
-18% | -13% /
-23% | 23% /
27% | -13% /
-31% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 90 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 41.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 210.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 210.1 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 99 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 210.1 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3728 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4577 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4786 puntos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3449 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 155% | 33% | 71% | -12% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 186.8 | 397.9 113% | 390 109% | 189.4 1% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 213 | 426 100% | 188 -12% | 204.3 -4% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 335.9 | 720 114% | 283.3 -16% | 293.5 -13% | |
| Score Total | 1057 | 3617 242% | 1607 52% | 1865 76% | 1056 0% |
| Score Write | 350 | 1115 219% | 327 -7% | 611 75% | 374 7% |
| Score Read | 463 | 1654 257% | 870 88% | 850 84% | 448 -3% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.053 | 0.026 51% | 0.035 34% | 0.028 47% | 0.11 -108% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.042 36% | 0.055 17% | 0.034 48% | 0.076 -15% |
| 4K-64 Write | 223.8 | 862 285% | 197.7 -12% | 422.2 89% | 271.4 21% |
| 4K-64 Read | 379.4 | 1465 286% | 723 91% | 671 77% | 370.3 -2% |
| 4K Write | 79.2 | 134.4 70% | 92 16% | 132.9 68% | 56.8 -28% |
| 4K Read | 31.24 | 56.4 81% | 29.52 -6% | 39.92 28% | 25.89 -17% |
| Seq Write | 466 | 1190 155% | 372.8 -20% | 560 20% | 463.4 -1% |
| Seq Read | 520 | 1325 155% | 1179 127% | 1389 167% | 514 -1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1695 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 64405 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6418 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 892 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 411 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.6 | 26 | 24.7 | 7.6 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 33.2 / 35.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -10% | 1% | -11% | -6% | -10% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 31.7 -12% | 30.2 -6% | 30.7 -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.9 -2% | 31.7 -12% | 30.2 -6% | 30.7 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.9 -2% | 31.7 -12% | 30.2 -6% | 30.7 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.9 -2% | 31.7 -12% | 30.2 -6% | 30.9 -9% |
| Load Average * | 33.2 | 40 -20% | 30.9 7% | 38.4 -16% | 32.9 1% | 38.7 -17% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.2 | 40 -14% | 33.5 5% | 34.7 1% | 39.3 -12% | 38.9 -11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+3.1 °C / 5.5 F).
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.21 / 0.55 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 11 / 11.3 Watt |
| Carga |
35.6 / 37.2 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 34% | 16% | 7% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 3.6 5% | 4.1 -8% | 4.3 -13% | 3.7 3% | 3.3 13% |
| Idle Average * | 11 | 6.4 42% | 4.2 62% | 6.3 43% | 5.2 53% | 6.2 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 9.2 19% | 5.1 55% | 9 20% | 7.6 33% | 10.4 8% |
| Load Average * | 35.6 | 34 4% | 22.1 38% | 32.7 8% | 41.6 -17% | 28 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.2 | 34.4 8% | 29.4 21% | 28.8 23% | 50.5 -36% | 25.7 31% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 24% | 130% | 125% | 87% | 46% | |
| Reader / Idle | 695 | 718 3% | 1295 86% | 1069 54% | 844 21% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 279 | 394 41% | 677 143% | 644 131% | 681 144% | 397 42% |
| Load | 60 | 77 28% | 157 162% | 174 190% | 78 30% | 105 75% |
Pro
Contra
El Notebook 9 de 13" ha sido creado con un objetivo en mente - Para ser el Ultrabook más ligero y brillante en su rango de tamaño. Samsung se ha salido en este sentido como el NP900X3N no sólo es ligeramente más ligero y brillante que el siguiente mejor, pero es significativamente así. Combine esto con el ventilador silencioso, puertos USB de tamaño completo y teclado respetable y esto es fácilmente el mejor Ultrabook de 13" para viajes y uso al aire libre.
El enfoque feroz de Samsung para crear el Ultrabook más ligero disponible ha llevado a algunos sacrificios a lo largo del camino. Con el fin de mantener el peso lo más bajo posible, el sistema carece de pantalla táctil y las opciones Gorilla Glass y tanto su sistema de refrigeración como la capacidad de la batería son muy pequeños. Esta última revelación, en particular, ha dado como resultado una duración de la batería por debajo de la media para un portátil que es excelente para su uso fuera del hogar. La rigidez del chasis, aunque no es mala, no está exactamente al mismo nivel que el XPS 13 o el MacBook Pro 13.
Esperamos que las futuras revisiones añadan Thunderbolt 3, compatibilidad SIM y una opción de panel mate para hacer que el portátil 9 sea un compañero de viaje aún mejor. Hasta entonces, los que quieren algo más ligero y más brillante que un XPS 13 sin sacrificar puertos USB o HDMI de tamaño completo como en el Zenbook 3, Matebook X, Yoga 910 o Specter 13 no quedarán decepcionados con el Samsung.
La pantalla extra luminosa y el peso superligero hacen de este portátil de 13" 9 una compra muy atractiva para cualquier usuario que esté constantemente en movimiento. Si la duración de la batería durante todo el día y las capacidades de acoplamiento Thunderbolt 3 son más importantes hay muchas opciones mejores.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
- 08/29/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
