Breve análisis del portátil Schenker XMG P507 (Clevo P651HS-G)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
|
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 357 cd/m²
Contraste: 714:1 (Negro: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG P507 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -4% | 6% | -6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 64.5 -3% | 64.6 -3% | 67.8 2% | 64.5 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 88.9 | 83.4 -6% | 84.6 -5% | 97.4 10% | 83.1 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.1 | 61 -6% | 61.8 -5% | 69.7 7% | 60.8 -7% |
Response Times | -71% | -63% | -117% | -75% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24 ? | 36 ? -50% | 34 ? -42% | 38 ? -58% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 23 ? -92% | 22 ? -83% | 26 ? -117% | 23 ? -92% |
PWM Frequency | 202 ? | ||||
Screen | 17% | 21% | 22% | 18% | |
Brightness middle | 357 | 288 -19% | 273 -24% | 293 -18% | 315 -12% |
Brightness | 365 | 292 -20% | 278 -24% | 279 -24% | 290 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 88 4% | 84 -1% | 85 0% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.3 40% | 0.27 46% | 0.33 34% | 0.32 36% |
Contrast | 714 | 960 34% | 1011 42% | 888 24% | 984 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.93 | 5.1 49% | 3.67 63% | 3.59 64% | 4.88 51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.87 | 9.44 37% | 8.33 44% | 5.79 61% | 8.88 40% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.32 | 4.43 57% | 2.73 74% | 3.86 63% | 4.17 60% |
Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.46 89% | 2.49 88% | 2.53 87% | 2.53 87% |
CCT | 10096 64% | 6687 97% | 7029 92% | 7229 90% | 6683 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 55 -5% | 55 -5% | 63 9% | 55 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 97 9% | 83 -7% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -20% /
1% | -15% /
5% | -30% /
9% | -21% /
1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 4 ms subida | |
↘ 8 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 28 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida | |
↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 31 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro |
PCMark 7 Score | 6390 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4320 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5412 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5180 puntos | |
ayuda |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | SCHENKER XMG P507 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -18% | -66% | -75% | ||
Seq Read | 2604 | 1983 -24% | 502 -81% | 504 -81% | |
Seq Write | 1678 | 1200 -28% | 455.5 -73% | 309.9 -82% | |
4K Read | 49.2 | 50 2% | 20.08 -59% | 16.31 -67% | |
4K Write | 160.3 | 144.1 -10% | 89.9 -44% | 65.5 -59% | |
Score Total | 3629 | 2566 -29% | 915 -75% | 598 -84% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16383 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 91859 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24365 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13129 puntos | |
ayuda |
XCOM 2 | |
1920x1080 Maximum Preset (8xMSAA instead of FXAA) AA:8xMS AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 |
FIFA 17 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
Titanfall 2 | |
1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
1920x1080 High / Enabled AA:TS AF:8x | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare | |
1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:T2X SM | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
1920x1080 High / On AA:FX | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
Dishonored 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:TX | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
Watch Dogs 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
XCOM 2 (2016) | 71.3 | 41.7 | ||
FIFA 17 (2016) | 200 | 196 | ||
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 123 | 111 | ||
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 114 | 112 | ||
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 85.4 | 62.1 | ||
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 75.3 | 55.1 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 44 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 34 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 46 / 52 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 10% | 11% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 31 | 30 3% | 30 3% | 30 3% | 30 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 31 6% | 32 3% | 32 3% | 32 3% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 32 6% | 33 3% | 33 3% | 33 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 44 | 38 14% | 34 23% | 34 23% | 34 23% |
Load Average * | 46 | 46 -0% | 40 13% | 37 20% | 39 15% |
Load Maximum * | 52 | 49 6% | 46 12% | 46 12% | 51 2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | 13% | 12% | 8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.2 | 49.3 -0% | 44 11% | 45.3 8% | 48 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 62 | 52.7 15% | 53.1 14% | 62.6 -1% | 46.8 25% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.4 | 32.6 -1% | 28.8 11% | 25.3 22% | 33.7 -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 33 | 29.5 11% | 28.2 15% | 27.3 17% | 30.5 8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 14 / 18 / 24 Watt |
Carga |
87 / 201 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | -27% | -9% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14 | 11 21% | 20 -43% | 18 -29% | 20 -43% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 16 11% | 26 -44% | 22 -22% | 24 -33% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 21 12% | 32 -33% | 30 -25% | 29 -21% |
Load Average * | 87 | 80 8% | 100 -15% | 77 11% | 86 1% |
Load Maximum * | 201 | 174 13% | 202 -0% | 165 18% | 183 9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 60 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 60 Wh | MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, 75.24 Wh | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 65 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, 62 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | 41% | 26% | 18% | 1% | |
H.264 | 213 | 271 27% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 195 | 274 41% | 246 26% | 210 8% | 196 1% |
Pro
Contra
El XMG P507 de Schenker Technologies es una buena elección para jugones que busquen un portátil potente y relativamente compacto. Éste dispositivo de 15 pulgadas no nos decepciona en ninguno de los dos aspectos principales: componentes y rendimiento. Todas las aplicaciones funcionan con fluidez gracias al SSD NVMe y a la GeForce GTX 1070.
El fabricante también debe ser alabado por la combinación de G-Sync y 120 Hz, pero aún así la pantalla no colma nuestras exigencias. Además de los negros, la precisión de color y los ángulos de visualización, también tenemos que criticar el contraste. Otro problema es que se aprecian con facilidad las fuentes de luz, el control del ventilador en reposo, el ruido generado bajo carga, así como la mediocre duración de la batería. La calidad de sonido también podría mejorarse.
Con todo, el rendimiento es adecuado y se hace sitio en nuestro raking Gaming-Top-10.
El diseño del chasis es muy sobrio y bien construido y es bastante delgado, además puedes ampliar o actualizar los componentes. Los buenos dispositivos de entrada y la cantidad de puertos son destacables. Es una pena sin embargo que el puerto USB 3.1 de segunda generación no soporte Thunderbolt 3.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
- 01/19/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser