Breve análisis del portátil Schenker XMG U507 (Clevo P751DM2-G)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 573:1 (Negro: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.41 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | Eurocom Tornado F5 1920x1080 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | -6% | 0% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 64.5 -3% | 63.9 -4% | 66 -1% | 66.4 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.2 | 83 -7% | 83.1 -7% | 90.5 1% | 88.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 60.7 -7% | 60.8 -7% | 66.2 1% | 65.1 0% |
| Response Times | -188% | -150% | -34% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26 ? | 33.6 ? -29% | 37 ? -42% | 25 ? 4% | 24 ? 8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 7 ? | 31.2 ? -346% | 25 ? -257% | 12 ? -71% | 12 ? -71% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 21% | 23% | 11% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 384 | 315.8 -18% | 310 -19% | 386 1% | 357 -7% |
| Brightness | 372 | 310 -17% | 311 -16% | 382 3% | 365 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 85 -3% | 93 6% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.33 51% | 0.3 55% | 0.39 42% | 0.5 25% |
| Contrast | 573 | 957 67% | 1033 80% | 990 73% | 714 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.89 | 5 49% | 4.82 51% | 10.2 -3% | 9.93 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.56 | 10.1 31% | 10.14 30% | 15.81 -9% | 14.87 -2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.41 | 4.2 60% | 3.94 62% | 11.28 -8% | 10.32 1% |
| Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.12 104% | 2.45 90% | 2.23 99% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 9919 66% | 6107 106% | 6877 95% | 11383 57% | 10096 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 54.5 -6% | 54 -7% | 59 2% | 58 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 83 -7% | 83 -7% | 90 1% | 89 0% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -58% /
-12% | -44% /
-6% | -8% /
3% | -9% /
-2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 4.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta muy rápidos en nuestros tests y debería ser adecuada para juegos frenéticos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 17 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 26 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 32 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 7892 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5478 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5629 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Alienware 15 R3 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 3% | -61% | -4% | ||
| Seq Read | 2634 | 2819 7% | 510 -81% | 2604 -1% | |
| Seq Write | 1621 | 2046 26% | 288.2 -82% | 1678 4% | |
| 4K Read | 49.18 | 51 4% | 37.2 -24% | 49.2 0% | |
| 4K Write | 180.9 | 150.5 -17% | 104 -43% | 160.3 -11% | |
| Score Total | 4122 | 3943 -4% | 1019 -75% | 3629 -12% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18882 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 189309 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32726 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15106 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Watch Dogs 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Mass Effect Andromeda | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| For Honor | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Dishonored 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TX | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Alienware 15 R3 | |
| FIFA 17 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| XCOM 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Maximum Preset (8xMSAA instead of FXAA) AA:8xMS AF:16x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 112 | 63 | ||
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 87.7 | 42.6 | ||
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 370 | 365 | ||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 104 | 85 | ||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 92.3 | 67 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 148 | 111 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 94 | 53.9 | ||
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 83.5 | 75.6 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 35 / 38 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 33 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 45 / 49 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 3% | -2% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29.4 2% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 33.3 -4% | 34 -6% | 31 3% | 33 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 33.5 4% | 35 -0% | 32 9% | 34 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 33.5 12% | 36 5% | 42 -11% | 44 -16% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 44.2 2% | 40 11% | 49 -9% | 46 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 52.5 -7% | 46 6% | 50 -2% | 52 -6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.6 °C / 99.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.7 °C / -15.7 F).
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 16% | 9% | -14% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47.8 | 37.4 22% | 40.6 15% | 46 4% | 49.2 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.1 | 44.8 12% | 48.4 5% | 51.8 -1% | 62 -21% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.5 | 25.4 17% | 26.8 12% | 36.5 -20% | 32.4 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 24.8 11% | 26.4 5% | 38.2 -37% | 33 -19% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Eurocom Tornado F5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 1.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 28 / 34 / 44 Watt |
| Carga |
125 / 270 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 31% | 32% | 40% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 21.2 24% | 20 29% | 19 32% | 14 50% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 25.1 26% | 24 29% | 23 32% | 18 47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 44 | 26.3 40% | 29 34% | 29 34% | 24 45% |
| Load Average * | 125 | 169.4 -36% | 82 34% | 85 32% | 87 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 178 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 270 | 202.4 25% | 193 29% | 192 29% | 201 26% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| SCHENKER XMG U507 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 82 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 17% | 49% | 55% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 194 | 291 50% | 377 94% | 382 97% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 170 | 216 27% | 246 45% | 264 55% | 195 15% |
| Load | 90 | 67 -26% | 98 9% | 102 13% | |
| H.264 | 252 | 266 | 213 |
Pro
Contra
Rendimiento de primera a precio de lujo: Ese podría ser el resumen del XMG U507 de Schenker Technologies. La configuración base no es excesivamente cara por 1749 Euros, pero cuando se seleccionan los componentes (GeForce GTX 1070, Core i7 con Hyperthreading, al menos 16 GB de RAM, unidad SSD basada en PCIe) el precio sube con facilidad hasta 2500 o 3000 euros. Los jugones más exigentes que quieran muchas interfaces, buenas características de mantenimiento, una configuración personalizada y máximos detalles en Full HD deberían estar satisfechos con el XMG U507.
Seleccionar el panel IPS o el TN a 120Hz depende principalmente del punto de vista del comprador. Los usuarios que valoran cada frame y ven cualquier fallo en la sincronización vertical deberían ignorar el panel de la 120Hz (negros poco profundos, bajo contraste y un ligero tinte azulado). Los paneles IPS son la mejor opción para la mayoría ya que tienen mayor contraste y mejores ángulos de visualización. Schenker debería realizar mejoras también en el adaptador de corriente, ya que es un poco escaso para la combinación de GeForce GTX 1070 con el Core i7-7700K - al menos cuando funciona a pleno rendimiento. Aparte de esto, solo habría que añadir a la lista de defectos una batería de escasa duración y la tapa muy inestable que provoca distorsiones en la imagen cuando se realiza presión sobre ella.
En el resto de aspectos se sitúa por encima de la media que ofrece la competencia. La conectividad, el rendimiento y el sonido son mejores que en modelos de la competencia. Sin embargo, el MSI GT62VR 7RE, el Alienware 15 R3 y el Acer Predator 15 (aún no probado en la configuración con Kaby Lake) consiguen puntuaciones comparables. Puede merecer la pena considerar el Schenker si estas buscando un portátil para juegos ligero y delgado.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
SCHENKER XMG U507 2017
- 03/26/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
