Breve análisis del portátil convertible Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Porsche Design BOOK ONE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Porsche Design BOOK ONE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 89 %
Brillo con batería: 262 cd/m²
Contraste: 1008:1 (Negro: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) BOE06EC, , 2160x1440, 12.6" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T BOE BOE06AC (NV126A1M-N51), , 2880x1920, 12.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -2% | 17% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.6 | 58.8 -16% | 65.2 -6% | 81.8 18% | 66.6 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90 | 87.5 -3% | 91 1% | 98.3 9% | 96.5 7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 60.6 -8% | 66.1 0% | 82.2 25% | 67.8 3% |
| Response Times | 9% | 2% | 12% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 37 ? 10% | 45 ? -10% | 30 ? 27% | 37 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 26 ? 7% | 24 ? 14% | 29 ? -4% | 25 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 22130 ? | |||
| Screen | -26% | -7% | -2% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 262 | 369 41% | 406 55% | 316 21% | 482 84% |
| Brightness | 254 | 331 30% | 396 56% | 307 21% | 466 83% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 75 -16% | 88 -1% | 91 2% | 92 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.46 -77% | 0.3 -15% | 0.29 -12% | 0.395 -52% |
| Contrast | 1008 | 802 -20% | 1353 34% | 1090 8% | 1220 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.34 | 5.52 -65% | 5.28 -58% | 3.91 -17% | 4 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.12 | 9.29 -30% | 9.83 -38% | 7.9 -11% | 7.2 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.28 | 6.95 -112% | 6.71 -105% | 5.37 -64% | 5.7 -74% |
| Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.58 85% | 2.29 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7180 91% | 7009 93% | 6532 100% | 7812 83% | 7950 82% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 56 -5% | 59 0% | 72 22% | 62 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 88 -2% | 91 1% | 98 9% | 96 7% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -9% /
-18% | -2% /
-5% | 9% /
4% | 6% /
6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8719 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2591 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4034 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 89% | 256% | 3% | 116% | 20% | |
| Read Seq | 475.3 | 1066 124% | 2408 407% | 398.9 -16% | 1308 175% | 518 9% |
| Write Seq | 260.9 | 593 127% | 1702 552% | 402 54% | 961 268% | 267.2 2% |
| Read 512 | 289.3 | 653 126% | 1301 350% | 303.1 5% | 227.5 -21% | 562 94% |
| Write 512 | 260.7 | 535 105% | 1288 394% | 320.3 23% | 792 204% | 263.5 1% |
| Read 4k | 30.06 | 35.92 19% | 53.6 78% | 26.11 -13% | 53.6 78% | 32.88 9% |
| Write 4k | 73.5 | 128.3 75% | 162.2 121% | 57.7 -21% | 136.3 85% | 85.6 16% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 296.8 | 460.6 55% | 504 70% | 245.8 -17% | 485.6 64% | 351.3 18% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 239.8 | 425.4 77% | 420.8 75% | 253.8 6% | 421.5 76% | 265.2 11% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1552 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5878 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 316 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 24.55 | 11.32 | 9.98 | |
| Thief (2014) | 10.6 | 6.1 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 6.86 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 30.8 / 32.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-5 °C / -9 F).
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.41 / 4.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 5.7 / 7.4 Watt |
| Carga |
15 / 29.7 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.6" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 2880x1920, 12.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -27% | -66% | -71% | -53% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.86 -14% | 3.5 -3% | 6.7 -97% | 4.2 -24% | 4.8 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 5.7 | 6.4 -12% | 7.2 -26% | 10.3 -81% | 10.1 -77% | 7.9 -39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 7.17 3% | 7.9 -7% | 13.5 -82% | 14 -89% | 10.7 -45% |
| Load Average * | 15 | 30.5 -103% | 29.6 -97% | 26 -73% | 37.4 -149% | 35 -133% |
| Load Maximum * | 29.7 | 32.4 -9% | 30.8 -4% | 28.8 3% | 34 -14% | 31.6 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620) i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus Transformer 3 Pro T303UA-GN050T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -3% | 1% | -28% | 35% | 55% | |
| Reader / Idle | 842 | 711 -16% | 713 -15% | 426 -49% | 1087 29% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 280 | 355 27% | 345 23% | 223 -20% | 489 75% | 672 140% |
| Load | 118 | 95 -19% | 111 -6% | 102 -14% | 112 -5% | 115 -3% |
| H.264 | 206 | 614 | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 115 |
Pro
Contra
El Asus Transformer 4 Pro es una estafa de actualización de modelo. En realidad, el portátil convertible es de alguna manera inferior a su predecesor. La pantalla de menor resolución, la CPU estrangulada y un aguante de batería igual dejan pocas mejoras reconocibles para el Transformer 3 Pro. La única mejora realmente útil es el hecho de que el puerto USB Tipo-C ya no está ocupado por el cable de alimentación cuando el dispositivo está en modo de alimentación de CA.
Las mejoras del Transformer 4 Pro se logran a expensas de algunos de los buenos atributos del modelo anterior. En áreas cruciales, nuestra impresión de este dispositivo es peor que la de su predecesor. Los posibles compradores pueden considerar si un producto diferente les conviene más.
Los compradores de Transformer 4 Pro recibirán un portátil convertible que de hecho es un buen dispositivo, tomado de forma aislada. Comparado con la competencia, sin embargo, está claro dónde Asus reduce los costos. El rendimiento del procesador del dispositivo y el rendimiento SSD están muy por debajo del promedio. En comparación con el modelo anterior, el Transformer 3 Pro, las cosas se ven aún peor. Con la excepción de su mayor aguante de la batería, el nuevo modelo no ofrece ningún valor agregado genuino. A su precio actual, el rendimiento del Transformer 4 Pro es simplemente demasiado débil. Otros fabricantes están ofreciendo dispositivos con un rendimiento más fuerte a precios similares.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus Transformer 4 Pro (i7-7500U, HD620)
- 11/27/2017 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
