Breve análisis del smartphone LG K4 (2017)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 385 cd/m²
Contraste: 1100:1 (Negro: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.08
| LG K4 2017 854x480, 5" | Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y6 II Compact IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gigaset GS160 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Sony Xperia E5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo K6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -28% | -16% | -11% | 25% | 13% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle | 385 | 465 21% | 491 28% | 489 27% | 538 40% | 470 22% | 375 -3% |
| Brightness | 372 | 443 19% | 487 31% | 479 29% | 534 44% | 461 24% | 376 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 95 3% | 96 4% | 88 -4% | 91 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.84 -140% | 0.9 -157% | 0.55 -57% | 0.33 6% | 0.38 -9% | 0.32 9% |
| Contrast | 1100 | 554 -50% | 546 -50% | 889 -19% | 1630 48% | 1237 12% | 1172 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 7.8 -26% | 6.6 -6% | 8.3 -34% | 5.7 8% | 5.2 16% | 6 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.6 | 15.7 -25% | 12.9 -2% | 14.4 -14% | 11 13% | 9.5 25% | 9.5 25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7 | 8.4 -20% | 4.9 30% | 8.7 -24% | 4.7 33% | 5.6 20% | 4.5 36% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.07 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.08 106% | 2.51 88% | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 8257 79% | 8438 77% | 7090 92% | 9034 72% | 7264 89% | 7924 82% | 6975 93% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 33 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 46 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 23.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 77 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG K4 2017 | |
| HTC Desire 530 | |
| Gigaset GS160 | |
| Huawei Y6 II Compact | |
| Sony Xperia E5 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Lenovo K6 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| LG K4 2017 | Huawei Y5 II | Huawei Y6 II Compact | Gigaset GS160 | Sony Xperia E5 | Lenovo K6 | HTC Desire 530 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -60% | -60% | -58% | -6% | 9% | -56% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.3 | 29.47 -61% | 31.57 -58% | 30.71 -59% | 65 -14% | 78.2 4% | 35.56 -53% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 44.41 | 18.03 -59% | 17.12 -61% | 19.19 -57% | 45.56 3% | 50.4 13% | 18.22 -59% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG K4 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y5 II audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigaset GS160 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia E5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo K6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC Desire 530 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.21 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.64 / 1.14 / 1.25 Watt |
| Carga |
2.26 / 2.36 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| LG K4 2017 2500 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh | Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | Lenovo K6 3000 mAh | HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -40% | -43% | -55% | -90% | -55% | -132% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.54 16% | 0.57 11% | 0.56 12% | 1.03 -61% | 0.65 -2% | 1.58 -147% |
| Idle Average * | 1.14 | 1.58 -39% | 1.53 -34% | 1.7 -49% | 2.06 -81% | 1.65 -45% | 2.59 -127% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.25 | 1.7 -36% | 1.6 -28% | 1.75 -40% | 2.12 -70% | 1.67 -34% | 2.66 -113% |
| Load Average * | 2.26 | 2.98 -32% | 2.82 -25% | 4.17 -85% | 5.01 -122% | 3.58 -58% | 5.22 -131% |
| Load Maximum * | 2.36 | 4.98 -111% | 5.69 -141% | 5.07 -115% | 5.04 -114% | 5.58 -136% | 5.67 -140% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| LG K4 2017 2500 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh | Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh | Sony Xperia E5 2300 mAh | Lenovo K6 3000 mAh | HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -17% | 3% | 1% | -30% | 18% | -30% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 606 | 503 -17% | 623 3% | 615 1% | 422 -30% | 715 18% | 425 -30% |
| Reader / Idle | 1102 | 1175 | 1326 | 1626 | 1117 | ||
| Load | 253 | 222 | 244 | 350 | 250 | ||
| H.264 | 682 | 702 | 633 | 457 |
Pro
Contra
En comparación con su predecesor, el LG K4 ha florecido: Tiene un aspecto moderno y un mejor display LCD que el modelo pasado, aunque su baja resolución todavía no está a la altura. Su débil desempeño - tanto en las pruebas como en la práctica, que se hace evidente a través de su lenta respuesta a las órdenes, implica que no recomendaríamos el LG K4 a usuarios avanzados. Si estás buscando un teléfono simple, fácil de usar, vale la pena tener en cuenta el LG K4. Las opciones para la pantalla de inicio y especialmente el cambio sencillo entre las dos tarjetas SIM (de ser necesario) son una ventaja, pero no hay que olvidar la poca capacidad de almacenamiento interno. Nadie debería tener que confiar en una tarjeta de memoria externa.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
LG K4 2017
- 07/31/2017 v6 (old)
Inge Schwabe
Price comparison
