Breve análisis del smartphone Xiaomi Mi Max 2
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Phab 2 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Lenovo Phab 2 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| LG X power2 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 92 %
Brillo con batería: 530 cd/m²
Contraste: 1262:1 (Negro: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 6.4" | Nokia 5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | LG X power2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | Lenovo Phab 2 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 6.4" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | -5% | -7% | -5% | -21% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 530 | 630 19% | 482 -9% | 237 -55% | 507 -4% | 472.4 -11% | 696 31% |
| Brightness | 523 | 635 21% | 448 -14% | 237 -55% | 474 -9% | 479 -8% | 680 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 79 -14% | 92 0% | 85 -8% | 93 1% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.57 -36% | 0.64 -52% | 0.13 69% | 0.53 -26% | 0.482 -15% | 0.42 -0% |
| Contrast | 1262 | 1105 -12% | 753 -40% | 1823 44% | 957 -24% | 980 -22% | 1657 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 5 15% | 4 32% | 5.5 7% | 4.7 20% | 7 -19% | 4.3 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.6 | 8.7 18% | 6.5 39% | 12.7 -20% | 7.2 32% | 11 -4% | 9.4 11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 6.9 -68% | 3.4 17% | 6.1 -49% | 4.8 -17% | 7.9 -93% | 4.8 -17% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.13 103% | 2.07 106% | 2.25 98% | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7129 91% | 8736 74% | 6774 96% | 7943 82% | 6441 101% | 7826 83% | 7255 90% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 2232 Hz | ≤ 17 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 2232 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 17 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 2232 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 9.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 22.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 30 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | |
| Nokia 5 | |
| ZTE Blade V8 | |
| LG X power2 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55) | |
| LG X power2 (Chrome 59) | |
| ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
| Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 | Nokia 5 | ZTE Blade V8 | LG X power2 | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | Huawei Mate 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | 4% | -24% | -43% | 27% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 265.7 | 255.6 -4% | 278.1 5% | 243.8 -8% | 174.2 -34% | 594 124% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 139.6 | 74.9 -46% | 77.7 -44% | 41.7 -70% | 65.2 -53% | 142.9 2% |
| Random Read 4KB | 37.1 | 40.54 9% | 39.89 8% | 25.3 -32% | 20.9 -44% | 94.7 155% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.81 | 8.39 -35% | 12.69 -1% | 10.7 -16% | 9.1 -29% | 8.77 -32% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.6 ? | 83.9 0% | 96.5 ? 15% | 76.6 ? -8% | 47.67 ? -43% | 54 ? -35% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.5 ? | 62 -1% | 87.1 ? 39% | 58.1 ? -7% | 29.59 ? -53% | 29.53 ? -53% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG X power2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 42.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.09 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.6 / 1.75 / 1.87 Watt |
| Carga |
2.76 / 4.51 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 5300 mAh | Nokia 5 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | LG X power2 4500 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -18% | -30% | -41% | -48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.52 13% | 0.98 -63% | 0.63 -5% | 0.74 -23% | 0.78 -30% |
| Idle Average * | 1.75 | 1.78 -2% | 1.76 -1% | 1.42 19% | 2.04 -17% | 2.13 -22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.87 | 1.96 -5% | 1.79 4% | 1.47 21% | 2.22 -19% | 2.17 -16% |
| Load Average * | 2.76 | 3.23 -17% | 2.89 -5% | 5.89 -113% | 5.57 -102% | 6.32 -129% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.51 | 4.88 -8% | 5.62 -25% | 7.85 -74% | 6.59 -46% | 6.49 -44% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Xiaomi Mi Max 2 5300 mAh | Nokia 5 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | LG X power2 4500 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1091 | 713 -35% | 700 -36% | 982 -10% | 814 -25% | 758 -31% |
Pro
Contra
Xiaomi ha puesto un smartphone interesante en el mercado. Si usted acepta el enorme tamaño de 6,44" del Mi Max 2, conseguirña un paquete decente por alrededor de $ 360. Teniendo en cuenta su precio, el dispositivo de gama media no tiene debilidades dignas de mención.
Chapeau, Xiaomi. Definitivamente podemos recomendar el Mi Max 2 a cualquiera que aprecie los smartphones de pantalla grande y puede aceptar las restricciones de un dispositivo importado.
Desafortunadamente, el fabricante chino ha desperdiciado la actualización de la segunda generación de la serie Mi Max con un SoC más actualizado y un diseño moderno (sin bordes).
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2
- 09/04/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
