Breve análisis del subportátil Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 82 %
Brillo con batería: 259 cd/m²
Contraste: 785:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.92% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.61% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus X302UV-FN016T TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3" | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-d020ng IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 25% | 1% | 63% | 68% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.61 | 39.48 2% | 48.37 25% | 39.18 1% | 63.7 65% | 67.5 75% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.9 | 59.2 2% | 72.6 25% | 58.6 1% | 93 61% | 92.5 60% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.92 | 40.8 2% | 49.98 25% | 40.51 1% | 65.1 63% | 67.7 70% |
| Response Times | -20% | -28% | -24% | -1% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 33 ? 15% | 42 ? -8% | 41 ? -5% | 34 ? 13% | 31 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 23 ? 4% | 23 ? 4% | 34.4 ? -43% | 24 ? -0% | 22 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 50 ? -80% | 50 ? -80% | 208 ? -17% | 198 ? -21% | |
| Screen | 3% | -5% | -14% | 27% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 259 | 265 2% | 218 -16% | 247 -5% | 345 33% | 357 38% |
| Brightness | 253 | 261 3% | 210 -17% | 239 -6% | 335 32% | 351 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 90 10% | 88 7% | 81 -1% | 95 16% | 90 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.33 -0% | 0.5 -52% | 0.38 -15% | 0.25 24% | 0.58 -76% |
| Contrast | 785 | 803 2% | 436 -44% | 650 -17% | 1380 76% | 616 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.12 | 4.98 3% | 3.89 24% | 5.95 -16% | 4.94 4% | 3.39 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.12 | 9.75 4% | 7.11 30% | 14.2 -40% | 8.85 13% | 6.76 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 3.9 -3% | 4.9 -29% | 5.25 -38% | 5.85 -54% | 2.36 38% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.55 86% | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7405 88% | 7318 89% | 7860 83% | 6736 96% | 7105 91% | 6653 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38 3% | 46 24% | 37.28 1% | 60 62% | 60 62% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 59 2% | 73 26% | 58.37 1% | 93 60% | 93 60% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -5% /
-2% | -3% /
-4% | -12% /
-12% | 30% /
28% | 31% /
27% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 250 Hz | ≤ 80 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 250 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 80 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 250 Hz es relativamente baja, por lo que la gente sensible debería ver parpadeos y padecer fatiga visual por la pantalla (usado al brillo indicado a continuación). Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 50 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 39 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 25 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 55 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UA-FN121T | |
| Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5427 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3574 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4506 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4712 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | Asus X302UV-FN016T Hynix HFS128G3MND | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | HP Envy 13-d020ng Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -89% | -29% | 12% | 3% | 2% | |
| Read Seq | 494.5 | 108.3 -78% | 428.2 -13% | 515 4% | 478.7 -3% | 465 -6% |
| Write Seq | 494.1 | 109 -78% | 178.6 -64% | 338 -32% | 268.5 -46% | 321 -35% |
| Read 512 | 383.9 | 35.24 -91% | 282.6 -26% | 368.1 -4% | 386.6 1% | 331.4 -14% |
| Write 512 | 155.5 | 53.3 -66% | 179.1 15% | 338.6 118% | 268.8 73% | 321.2 107% |
| Read 4k | 36.08 | 0.395 -99% | 6.559 -82% | 28.88 -20% | 26.88 -25% | 21.41 -41% |
| Write 4k | 96.4 | 1.19 -99% | 71.2 -26% | 74.2 -23% | 78.7 -18% | 74.6 -23% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 403.3 | 1.139 -100% | 253 -37% | 319.9 -21% | 369.4 -8% | 325.4 -19% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 176.4 | 1.212 -99% | 174 -1% | 309.4 75% | 259.7 47% | 263 49% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8449 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1603 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 52169 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5407 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 764 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 68.5 | 34.4 | 19.7 | 9.6 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.7 | 25.3 | 21.3 | 7.1 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 33.8 | 26.1 | 16.9 | 6.3 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 31.2 / 33.3 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 40 / 39.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | 4% | 3% | 6% | 3% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 31.6 | 31.2 1% | 31.2 1% | 29.1 8% | 29.2 8% | 31.3 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.2 | 32.1 -3% | 32.9 -5% | 29.1 7% | 30.1 4% | 32.5 -4% | 31.3 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 31.2 | 32.1 -3% | 32.9 -5% | 29.1 7% | 30.1 4% | 32.5 -4% | 31.3 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.3 | 32.1 4% | 33 1% | 29.1 13% | 30.1 10% | 32.4 3% | 31.5 5% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 40 -0% | 33 17% | 41.1 -3% | 38.1 5% | 36 10% | 33.2 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.8 | 40.9 -3% | 34.6 13% | 46.4 -17% | 38.1 4% | 36.5 8% | 34.1 14% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | 3% | -17% | -12% | -16% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 33 | 38 -15% | 29.6 10% | 37.1 -12% | 38.6 -17% | 51 -55% | 38.1 -15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 35.4 | 39.1 -10% | 41 -16% | 43.2 -22% | 41.1 -16% | 46 -30% | 40.3 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 30.7 -13% | 24.8 9% | 32.1 -18% | 29.5 -8% | 25.5 6% | 25.8 5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29.3 | 31.1 -6% | 26.6 9% | 34.4 -17% | 30.8 -5% | 24.4 17% | 25.5 13% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.45 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.3 / 5.8 / 7.4 Watt |
| Carga |
29.2 / 28.6 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -3% | -27% | -14% | -25% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 5 -52% | 3.3 -0% | 3.4 -3% | 4.2 -27% | 4.2 -27% | 3.5 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 7.2 -24% | 5.1 12% | 6.5 -12% | 6.1 -5% | 7.4 -28% | 7.3 -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 8.7 -18% | 5.2 30% | 7 5% | 7.4 -0% | 10.1 -36% | 7.9 -7% |
| Load Average * | 29.2 | 32 -10% | 29.5 -1% | 44.5 -52% | 31.5 -8% | 33.4 -14% | 26.6 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.6 | 33 -15% | 44 -54% | 49.5 -73% | 37.1 -30% | 34.7 -21% | 28 2% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 35 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 35 Wh | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 51 Wh | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 35 Wh | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -9% | 15% | 52% | -25% | 12% | 20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 650 | 555 -15% | 1035 59% | ||||
| H.264 | 330 | 325 -2% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 340 | 351 3% | 392 15% | 412 21% | 254 -25% | 381 12% | 407 20% |
| Load | 118 | 94 -20% | 206 75% |
Pro
Contra
Los portátiles Lenovo de 13.3" a partir de ahora también se pueden tener con procesadores Kaby Lake. La nueva generación de CPUs de Intel ofrece bastante rendimiento para los años venideros. La mejora de rendimiento de Kaby Lake respecto a Skylake no lleva a un mayor ruido de sistema y aumento de temperatura. Un veloz SSD asegura un sistema rápido. Si bien es posible reemplazar el SSD, esto implica abrir la carcasa, ya que el ordenador no tiene escotilla de mantenimiento. El teclado iluminado parece bueno en general.
El procesador Kaby Lake no trae ninguna ventaja real. Los que quieran ahorrarse unos pocos Euros pueden elegir un modelo Skylake del IdeaPad.
El aguante de batería es bastante bueno. Aunque un portátil de 13.3" de esta gama de precios podría hacerlo mejor. Lenovo no ha considerado que un gran aguante de batería sea más importante que el máximo rendimiento posible en el segmento de 13.3". El IdeaPad se habría beneficiado de una batería con mayor capacidad que de un nuevo procesador Kaby Lake. El display Full HD IPS con amplio ángulo de visión ofrece unos resultados aceptables de su medición. Sin embargo, esperábamos más de un portátil de 880 Euros.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13IKB 80V00026GE
- 12/05/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
